Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Acenden Solicitors want hearing adjournment


flower2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I believe that's right. You can't be taken to court for charges. Just missed payments.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK I wrote to Acenden asking the question if they have included fees in the arrears they currently say I have and they have wrote back admitting they are included.

 

 

Can they be reported for including them, I really would like to nail these vultures.

 

 

Any help would be greatly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arrears charges are not missed contractual monthly payments and as such they should be added to the outstanding mortgage total. Are they trying to take you to court for possession ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ellen

 

 

Yes. We have a SPO from 2009 and as far as I am aware that has been paid not always on the 1st of the month. However they are adding a fee of £70 per month along with a £5 alternative payment fee plus interest which means the amount of the loan is increasing instead of decreasing. They are telling us we have arrears of nearly £6000 maybe over now as they are suppose to have applied for a warrant of repossession at the end of January 2015. Once I receive the eviction date I will put in a N244

 

 

I have previously asked for a different payment date but been refused and also a breakdown of the fees charged but the reply was we do not need to explain.

 

 

I am at the moment putting up a fight, with the help of this site, but each time I write I only seem to get part of the requested information. I a few months ago requested a SAR which when arrived was so complicated I wrote back & asked them to simplify, but then only received information from 2010. I am currently waiting for simplified information from before 2010. I suspect the arrears they say we owed in 2009 are mainly charges. whether I can challenge them I don't know.

 

 

I did apply for the charges to be refunded and got as far as the refusal & we could complain to the FOS within 6 months other wise the case would be closed. Unfortunately my Mum became very ill and needed full time care and I did not have the time to continue so the 6 months lapsed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi I recently complainted to Acenden re a SPPL loan & the excessive charges and the reply states ' Please note SPPL is in insolvent liquidation prosess and Acenden no longer deals with complaints for SPPL. All complaints and/or requests for further information regarding SPPL should now be sent to the following address: PwC LLP. Leeds'

 

This seems strange to me, I also found this on the internet;

 

 

In the recent case of Re: Southern Pacific Personal Loans Limited [2013] EWHC 2485 the High Court held that liquidators of a company in creditors’ voluntary liquidation are not data controllers of personal data held by the company under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The company had used a loan servicing company called Acenden Limited to carry out various activities in respect of that data, including holding data in relation to redeemed loans. Southern Pacific went into liquidation on 4 September 2012. The company continued to receive data subject access requests in respect of the redeemed loan data held by Acenden.

 

 

Anyone got an thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I recently complainted to Acenden re a SPPL loan & the excessive charges and the reply states ' Please note SPPL is in insolvent liquidation prosess and Acenden no longer deals with complaints for SPPL. All complaints and/or requests for further information regarding SPPL should now be sent to the following address: PwC LLP. Leeds' ... Anyone got an thoughts?

 

Acenden has been bought out of administration this year by the giant equity group Blackstone. PwC are the administrators appointed to deal with the Lehman Brothers aftermath. Send your complaint to PwC, tell them what Acenden said, and ask who should be dealing with this now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Good Morning can someone please advice me as to whether the following still applies.

 

Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.). [/i]

 

I am arguing with Acenden about there charges & they are now threatening to send a field agent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: what exactly have they said,

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think creditors are allowed to send field agents if you are refusing to communicate with them regarding any account you have with them. But you would need to study the terms of the loan to see whether this allows for such visits and for the visits to incur a fee.

 

Where are you with this Acenden account ?

 

Are you paying towards any arrears ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No paid I have paid off my arrears what they are adding are charges. I asked them for a breakdown of the charges which they ignored, so right or wrong I ignored them. I am continuing to pay my contractual amount.

 

I had a suspended possession order from 2009, but paid that back. I asked for a change of date from the 1st to the 25th but they refused.

 

I am not refusing to communicate with them just want them to communicate in writing with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest a formal written complaint by recorded delivery to Aceden saying that their conduct amounts to unwarranted harassment and is causing you distress.

 

Advise that you see no need for them to send out a field agent, as you are meeting your contractural amounts and it is them who have not complied with your request for information on charges added to the account.

 

Advise that you wish the FOS to look into this matter and if they are happy for this to happen as soon as possible, for them to issue a final letter, so a complaint with the FOS can be registered without delay.

 

Then see how they respond. Acenden have up to 60 days to respond or issue their final response letter beforehand, before you can start a complaint with the FOS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

all the field agents do is charge you £100 for nothing.

 

 

refuse it

and get that complaint running.

 

 

have you put is a reclaim for all the penalty charges to them?

and thus complained when they refuse to refund them to FSA?

 

 

re:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?296108-Hot-news-for-anyone-who-has-suffered-mortgage-arrears-charges-irresponsible-lending-or-other-unfair-lender-conduct

 

 

ive also merged your new thread with your existing one for history

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all the field agents do is charge you £100 for nothing. refuse it

 

I second this. Never accept a visit from an Acenden field agent except with your express written, prior, agreement. He (or she) is working for Acenden not you but an humungous fee will be charged to YOUR account for the visit.

 

Field agent visits are one of the 1001 ways Acenden has of keeping borrowers in arrears or putting them back into arrears when these had been cleared. Then, when the borrower's account is in arrears (again), they can charge their eye-wateringly high monthly so-called arrears management fee as well.

 

If Acenden write to say they are sending you a field agent, you must reply in writing to refuse the visit. If, for any reason, the field agent does make the visit without your prior written agreement, you will need to write to Acenden again to record the fact that you did not agree to this visit and they must remove the field agent visit charge from your account immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for your help but I am still having trouble getting a breakdown of their fees the reply I have received from the them is as follows

 

"Whist we note your request for a breakdown of our Collection/Arrears Administration Fees we must advise you that we will be unable to provide these details as it is considered commercially sensitive information. Furthermore we are not obliged to release this information"

 

Does anyone no if they can refuse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i would suggest you do, is pick up the phone to the FOS and start a complaint with them.

 

 

It sounds like they are refusing to register a complaint for FOS purposes or to even provide any information you are asking for. It is not commercially sensitive.

 

Don't waste any more time with Acedon, let the FOS contact them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help but I am still having trouble getting a breakdown of their fees the reply I have received from the them is as follows

 

"Whist we note your request for a breakdown of our Collection/Arrears Administration Fees we must advise you that we will be unable to provide these details as it is considered commercially sensitive information. Furthermore we are not obliged to release this information"

 

Does anyone no if they can refuse?

 

No, of course they cannot lawfully refuse to give you details of fees they are making you or expecting you to pay.

 

Complain to the FOS, as UncleBulgaria67 suggests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I am in dispute with Acenden as to the arrears they claim we owe,

they filed for an extension of the repossession order given in 2009 which the amount the court ordered has been paid.

 

We have already been to court & the judge adjourned for Acenden to provide the information I have been asking for and then for me to respond. 

 

We received the required info and I responded to the information, which was signed for by their solicitor on the 19th March 2019.

 

Today we have received a letter asking for us to agree & sign an agreement to an adjournment on the the first available date after 28 days.

 

My question is am 1. Being unreasonable to decline, my view is they have had sufficient time to investigate. 

                                  2. Would it go against me if I declined.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Acenden Solicitors want hearing adjournment

IMHO

no

and 

no

SAr's are free now

why not fire a new one off too.

 

hope you are going for the jugular and getting all charges reclaimed too + the interest these have gandered since 2006.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they got the extension, but one good thing came out of it.

 

They had added legal costs to my account when the judge had said costs reserved.

 

I asked the judge if I was going to get more legal costs added as I had already had one lot and he ordered that they be removed and to immediately change their procedure that the legal costs are not automatically added.

Which is what they said happens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good work.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Help. I am totally despondent.

1. How much does it cost to go to court? 

2. Would I be able to get any help in how to go about it/complete any forms

 

After fighting with Acenden re arrears they said I had I am now at a loss. Really annoyed.

 

I had a suspended possession order for a secured loan, from 1990 which was paid.

 

Then last year Acenden said I had arrears of £1496.10. All payments have been made each month, maybe not on the first but always paid that month since suspended possession order that was granted in 1090.

 

I asked Acenden to give me a break down of missed payments in writing, which they failed to produce.

 

Earlier this year they took us to court for possession. when it was brought to the judges attention he asked them to reply and set another date. In April they asked for an extension. 

 

I had claimed a PPI payment from them which I eventually asked them to apply to our arrears, (wished I hadn't & continued with the court)

 

at the end of July Acenden's solicitors wrote saying they had applied for the application to be withdrawn. (There was no arrears on the account now) and their client had confirmed no legal fees in connection to the application would be applied to our mortgage,

 

Today I find not only has £487.60 legal fees been applied in March but a further £1369.50 has been applied in August.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sar and write and complain then surely

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...