Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Audi A3 1.8 TFSI Excessive Oil Consumption - Advice/opinions required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wanted to get some opinions/advice regarding an issue I have and wanted to know what the general feeling, or even better someone who has experienced this problem and what the outcome was....

 

I purchased an Audi A3 1.8TFSI and the car has the same oil consumption issue as the 2.0 TFSI (mainly Audi A5's but A3 and other models also).

 

I went for the 1.8TFSI as I didn't think it had the same oil consumption issue but it appears it does, just less well known.

 

My local Audi dealer is doing all of the tests and in a couple of weeks they will have all of the details to put forward to Audi UK for a solution and a cost and what they expect me to contribute towards it if I have the work done.

 

Audi say that the more main dealer services you have had, the more favourable this will be looked at and and if you were to have the next service with them, this would help also.

 

Through speaking with my contact, he seems to think that the dealer that sold me the car (non Audi) could be liable for the cost of any repairs as he sold the car to me and the car clearly has a fault.

 

I countered this by saying the dealer is likely to say it's a known Audi issue therefore the issue is with Audi and they are liable.

 

Who is liable?? The dealer who sold the car or Audi?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The seller of the car would be liable for all defects.

 

You don't seem to have told us when you bought the car. Is it a secret?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't answer my question as to when you bought the car. Why are you keeping it secret?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I misread the email - I thought you said where - no secret, no conspiracy!

 

I bought it in September last year.

 

I raised the issue with the dealer within a few weeks and they had a look at it for leaks but couldn't see anything and said it may just be the case it burns more oil due to the engine is is.

 

They recommended trying a thicker Oil which would last longer however the issue has been getting steadily worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well known problem and plenty of discussions about it on Audi forums.

Unfortunately no solution either, just top up when required.

I used to have an Alfa 156 and accordingly to factory spec it would eat half kilo of oil every 2000 miles.

In any other car I owed I only ever topped up once a year in between services by 100/200ml at most.

I don't think Audi would even recognise this as a defect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter that it's a well-known problem. If the purchaser didn't know about it then he is not encumbered by it. The car was purchased in September and so you are still within six months of the purchase date.

 

This means that under the consumer rights act you are entitled to a repair and if the repair fails then you are entitled to reject the vehicle.

 

The seller is responsible and they are not entitled to pass the buck onto Audi or to anybody else.

 

You should act quickly to reserve your rights. Send the seller a letter – recorded delivery – pointing out that the vehicle is defective and that they have a single opportunity to carry out a repair and that if they do not carry out the repair or if the repair fails then you will assert your right to reject under the 2015 Act.

 

Tell them that you are not prepared to contribute to the cost of repairs. The liability is entirely theirs and you are not prepared to be passed around and to deal with Audi directly.

 

Make sure you send this letter – whatever you agree.

 

Then you need to tell us what action you want to take if anything. You need to tell us what you pay for the vehicle. In fact it would be helpful if you simply laid out the entire story because dragging it out of you bit by bit is a bit like pulling teeth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I would add to what has been said is that you bought a car knowing the 2.0 engine had an oil consumption issue. You say it’s known that the 1.8 engine has this same issue albeit not as well known. I don’t wish to sound harsh but you’ve seemingly done a little research into this, learned that the engine has a common fault yet decided to press on with the purchase and then subsequently found that the car you bought has the same issue you sought to avoid in the first place?

 

I suppose you’ll have to wait to see what Audi say and as to whether the consumption is within their tolerances. As said above there’s plenty of info out there on this subject.

 

How old is the car and how many miles and how many main dealer services has it had if you don’t mind me asking? It’s a shame about these engines, I really like the look of the Audi A3’s!

 

Out of curiosity, did the thicker oil slow down (no pun intended) the issue? How much oil is the car using?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's a fair point - and of course that means having to trust Audi!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the handbook of VAG cars iirc it says that oil consumption of 1LTR per 1,000kms is within normal limits. BMW petrols can use a LTR every 1,000 MLS or so. Some engines consume oil when in normal use, Ford/Mazda 1.8 petrol, Peugeot/Mini VTI 1.4/1.6 petrol variants etc.

 

The OP does not state how old their Audi is but increasing oil consumption is all part of running a car as it gets older. Some people think cars are like washing machines and will just run without attention for 15 years. The modern combustion engine is a miracle of human engineering with some components moving with the same intertia/speed as a bullet when it leaves the barrel of a firearm.

 

Audi dealers will perform a consumption test on these TFSI units where they top up the oil and then ask the owner to run the car to accurately measure the oil being used to see if it is within tolerance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a solution, I've stopped retailing vehicles with TFSI engines due to these issues, the repair needed is generally new piston rings, which requires removing and dismantling the engine, a labour intensive job, although on the occasions I've needed to have repairs on 1.4 TFSI and 1.8 TFSI engines on cars I've retailed, Audi and Volkswagen have covered the costs which would no doubt run into the thousands. I believe in America, there was actually a class action law suit against Audi in relation to these faults, not to mention they appeared on BBC Watchdog here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...