Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But when you perform your Stat Dec the earlier convictions will be expunged (as if they had never happened) and the sentences handed down for them are revoked. Any convictions and sentences which follow after that will occur on whatever date they are handed down and so can be appealed up to 21 days after that date.. There is simply no need for an appeal against them to be lodged at this stage. If nothing else, you do not know what you will be convicted of.   If that has what he's told you I believe he is misleading you. Magistrates are not simply waiting in court for people to turn up to make SDs. As I said earlier, most courts provide appointment dates specifically for Stat Decs and, in the areas I know about it is unusual at present to get a date shorter than three or four weeks hence. Then you really need to speak to the solicitor to find out exactly what the hearing he has arranged is for, because until you perform your stat dec your current convictions remain and the charges cannot be put to you again (so providing you with the opportunity to offer the "deal").. This is really such a straightforward matter and I don't know why the solicitor is making it appear far more complex than it is. I would never suggest you ignore his advice, but you really need to find out and understand what his advice is seeking to achieve and how it will achieve it.  
    • Thanks, FTMDave; I appreciate you looking into this. I'm going to draft an email to the new CEO, [email protected]. Looney got thrown out for not declaring "relationships in the workplace." 🍆 😉
    • Well, a letter of claim has arrived as predicted. Will be following dx100uk post and use your PAP reply form instead of the one they have sent. I have a couple of questions, do I send the CCA request to Cabot or to Mortimer Clarke? What should I state as the reason? I dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation.  
    • You pushed me to look at all our MET cases going back till June 2014.  That's 10 years so at that point I got sick & stopped! MET have never, ever taken a Cagger as far as a court hearing in all that time. As scribbled above, they have issued court papers a few times but have always bottled before the hearing. In one exceptional case the motorist didn't even have to defend - the judge chucked out the case due to rubbish Particulars of Claim. Sadly in two cases MET got a judgment because the motorist didn't file a defence to the claim.  But in one of the cases MET still didn't get their money as the person said he was elderly, didn't need credit and would rather put up with a CCJ than pay MET! So that's who you're dealing with - paper tigers.  They do court in maybe 5% of cases but even then bottle before it gets to a hearing. Anyway, let's see what writing to BP produces.
    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dutch house being auctioned - will debt collection agency come to our UK address?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

We moved back back to the UK 5 years ago, having left our Dutch house as a rental property, with the monthly rent covering the mortgage payments.

 

Apparently we were ill-advised, as we understood that this rental agreement could be long term, but apparently there was a limit of a few years.

The mortgage company have made it clear that we need to sell the property, and despite our tenant offering to buy the property, they are pressing on with the sale of the house.

 

We have received a letter detailing when the property will be auctioned and a statement that recovery of any shortfall will begin within a couple of days of the property sale.

 

So, my questions are:

 

1) Can we expect bailiffs appearing at the door in the new year, or will we be given the opportunity to come to an arrangement about repayment of the shortfall (no clue how this would work, my husband is about to lose his job, and I work part time whilst caring for our young daughter - but that’s background information).

 

2) I would imagine that the average solicitor in the UK would have limited knowledge in this area - where could we find some legal advice? And how much might this cost?

 

Thank you very much for any advice

- as you can imagine,

this is a very stressful situation,

made worse by my husband finding out only a few days ago that he will lose his job before the end of the year.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs wont become involved. It would have to go to court, go through a lenghty process before and after, plus theres the whole question about jurisdiction.

 

They cant just click their fingers and a bailiff appears.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing will happened and if the shortfall is dutch forget about it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They can't give any court date without following a lengthy procedure.

 

That procedure Includes asking you to pay or contact them.

 

Them issuing a pap letter. Then you filling it in or delaying it. Which takes a month or more. Then.issuing a court claim. Then you defending it. Being assigned a court. date.

 

This can and usually does take many months.

 

Then on top there the whole jurisdiction issue.

 

Post that letter up because it sounds like a threatogram.

 

Remember you're resident in the UK. So they'd have to file a claim here under UK and euro law.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read upload

Scan to pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, the court date is in the Netherlands, not the UK.

 

ETA: I have scanned in the letter, but the version of Acrobat we used to help translate stuff was on my husband's work PC, which he no longer has access to since losing his job (obviously).

Edited by NinjaBee1
Additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

So theyre trying to go for a court claim int he netherlands. Even though you arent resident there and cant defend yourself?

 

Sounds like the old trick DCA's have over here where they hope to get a judgement by default, despite knowing your current whereabouts, they serve on an old address.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just managed to translate the document (had to sign up for a trial of Adobe, so will need to cancel before I get charged).

 

It sounds like the court hearing is say they are ending the rental agreement with our tenants so that they can put the house up for auction without tenants in it.

Looks like they have assigned us some kind of legal contact.

 

Obviously we can't attend, as can't afford to travel and wouldn't understand what was happening anyway.

My Dutch was OK while living there, but have been back here 5 years and not spoken it since.

 

Also, to clarify further, the letter mentions our current address in the UK and the letter were sent to our UK address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to pay for translate

just pop it up an google and it does it free for you.

 

I would suspect the dutch system is the same as most of Europe etc etc

if you are not resident here

then nothing can happen as they know you are in the UK now.

if worst come to worst you simply write stating you are now domicile in the UK and therefore a UK resident.

and they cant do court in Denmark when they know you are permanently resident abroad..

 

 

be better if we saw this please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bailiffs etc wont come to your UK home.

They cant.

 

Theyd have to get a judgement in the UK and enforce it.

There may be cross jurisdiction stuff due to it being europe, but theyd still have to get permission from a court.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply write to the court stating you are now a resident of the UK and do cannot attend.

 

I hereby call upon you to appear on January 14, 2019, at 9:15 am, before the service provider

 

of this court with an overbearing address. to be heard in response to a

 

on behalf of Bank ofScotland PLC by lawyer Illr. filed petition.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...