Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty Dealership - Second Hand Car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I bought a second hand Peugeot in June from a dealership.

It was 8 years old. 80k mileage.

I paid £1500 by bacs transfer.

 

8 weeks later the car had issues starting and the battery would die here and there.

I returned to the dealer who reassured me there were no underlying issues (and the cause was likely low coolent lebels :/ ) and continued using the car.

 

Couple of weeks pass and the car is making beep noises (nothing on dashboard) and strange pipe whistle sounds seem to be coming from the exhaust.

 

I took the car back to the dealer, he checked the car and said there were no underlying issues.

 

Few weeks after in September, I brokedown and breakdown recovery said the cause was a broken car radiator.

 

At this point, I wasn’t aware of my rights and I paid £120 for this to be replaced.

I thought this may have been the cause of the beeping and (perhaps due to overheating) the issue with battery but these issues continued and I started to notice oil leaks.

 

Of course at this point to rogue dealership refused to assist and told me I had no rights.

After much back and forth he agreed to have the car checked out by a mechanic (his choice) in October.

 

The mechanics highlighted various issues, the main being a badly damaged head gasket.

The dealership refused to meet the costs of the repairs and again after lots of back and forth and letter before action quoting CRA2015 ,after speaking to trading standards he agreed to replace the gasket.

 

4 weeks later, I noticed that the leaks continued (the beeping and issue with the flat battery when starting the car persisted throughout).

 

I went to an independent mexhanic who confirmed that the leaks, issues with starting the car and noises are a result of a broken head gasket ( the one that the dealership supposedly replaced 4 weeks ago).

 

The mechanic said whatever was done was a very temporary fix.

 

I am considering further action, any advice?

Is it worth me demanding a refund since his repair failed?

 

Cheers

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

send him a copy of the report that says the head gasket has failed and it was a bodged fix.

he has had his one chance to repair it under CRA2015

hes failed

 

its within 6mts, so demand a full refund in 14 days or you'll issue a court claim without any further notice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a shame that you have allowed yourself to be led around by the nose for so long.

 

Even though it is a very cheap vehicle, you should have put a stop to it much earlier on and frankly you should have continued with your proposed legal action unless you had your money back.

 

I would suggest that you send a letter of claim and then begin the legal action against them if they don't refund you your money within the timescale what you set out - 14 days.

 

Why haven't you told us the name of the dealer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

send him a copy of the report that says the head gasket has failed and it was a bodged fix.

he has had his one chance to repair it under CRA2015

hes failed

 

its within 6mts, so demand a full refund in 14 days or you'll issue a court claim without any further notice

 

cheers, I’ll get that done today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@bankfodder. I know, I was completely ignorant of my rights. This was my first car. Trust me, really frustrated at myself as I desperately need a car to work aswell.

 

Frankly, the guys at the dealership are pretty agressive, I’m even a little worried about how to suggest arrangement of the return of the vehicle (though I’m almost certain they won’t give a refund). Would you put it to them to atrange for collection of the car. The 6 month period has past but I have been raising concerns since July and my initial letter before action was sent a couple of months ago. I’m concerned this will detriment my claim :(. Will sent the letter today and update you all. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just follow the advice given by site team member: DX but this time at the expiry of the 14 days, issue the claim.

 

Sorry but it's a bit absurd to start sending threats and then say at the end of the 14 days if you don't do anything I'll-dollar path and then I'll do nothing.

 

I asked you who the dealer is that you haven't told us. Are you trying to protect them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sorry, if I were not clear, he ‘replaced’ the gasket which is why I didn’t proceed. But it’s since transpired that he just did a temporary fix hence the problem reoccurring. Unfortunately my limited car knowledge meant I took his word that the replacement occured when it hadn’t. It’s more a case of protecting myself as they are aggressive, know where I stay and could come accross the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you are frightened of them in that way, then how are you going to deal with having issued a court claim against them?

 

You may as well name them here. It won't make any difference but it will help others and also these people do care about their reputation a little bit.

 

I understand that there was a problem – a head gasket.

 

It was replaced and the head gasket failed. Since then the car has not been repaired. There is an ongoing defect.

 

Follow the advice here, send the letter of claim and then sue them. If you feel that this is not what you want to do because you are frightened then frankly there is nothing for you to do except suck it up, learn the lesson and have that nice feeling that somebody has trampled all of you.

 

What is the name of the dealer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...