Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've spoken with a number of others who have confirmed their issues MUST be from new leaks from lyca, not the october '23 leak. That the regulator is NOT on this is shameful  
    • We dont expect a minimum in donation - Anything you can offer helps us to run the site and keep it free for others in need similar to you.  The fact that you have is amazing! ❤️ thank you so much! 
    • I absolutely will, I cannot thank you all enough for always being on hand with sound advice. I couldn't have done any of this without you, genuinely.  I cannot afford to donate much right now, so please do not think the amount I have donated is in any way reflective of what I feel is right because it isn't. I don't have a million pounds to donate right now, nor will I ever most probably, but I do promise that when I am back on my feet a bit more, I will donate again x
    • Sorry - Spoke to soon...    So great news!  - They should remove it in 28 days. Hopefully it should be enough to ward off any further issues with account closure etc  What you need to do is keep this letter and use it should any further account be closed from this further point. You can actually challenge it and provide the evidence - Should give the provider course to reconsider. May even beable to take it to your old bank etc     Also ask for confirmation from MCB that they will not be placing another CIFAS marker going forward to cover all bases.    Also one more thing,  - Please consider a donation when you get a chance Glad we could have been some help  
    • There has been a development Submitted the N225 application yesterday.   MCOL now states: A Bar has been put in place?? (Take it that means cannot enforce judgement) A defence has been filed with the court This has all happened on the 34 day, so a day late the defendant's submission.??? Options???   Please note that the defendant can still reply to your claim until the court has processed your request. If the defendant’s reply is late but arrives before or even on the same day as your request, it will have priority.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

21 year old daughter in massive debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i have been following this site for years and know you have given some great help and advice.

So here I am asking for help for my daughter.

 

Background is

she over the last 2 years she has earned around £1300 a month and in this time she has managed to get herself in a right mess.

 

She started with catalogues from

Fashion world,

Littlewoods,

very and

studio

who have all been increasing her limit until they reached around £1500 to £2000

 

then came along credit cards Barclaycard,

marbles and

capital one with about £500 limit on each

 

then a 118118 loan of around £5000

 

To be fair she was managing all these payments but then she started on Payday loans which have completely messed her up.

She has been trying to make payments but she hasn't got a penny to her name.

 

Since august she has moved into her own property so things are even tighter now plus her work place has messed up her sept and oct pay so she is still waiting for payment from them for £1200

 

She has also from Monday started a new job with a slight drop of pay she will now be bringing home around £1100 a month.

 

My daughter is very depressed and I am quite worried about her to be honest I am sick of seeing her cry over money.

No 21 year old should be going through this.

 

My question is

I want to help her and get some letters sent to her creditors offering token payments

(she has agreed a payment plan with some but at silly amounts she can't afford.)

 

Where do i need to start?

 

Her contract phone has been cut off so the phone calls have stopped but she is consistently getting emails and letters.

(letters come to my address as ive told her not to change the address yet)

 

Does the irresponsible lending work?

as I am gobsmacked on how easy she could get a payday loan in 3 minutes from lots of different companies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if her credit rating was ok [no defaults etc] and it showed she could meet the payments, then p'haps ORL is not the way to go.

 

using the prorate letter from our debt collection section of the library

send each one a copy.

see what they say.

if they will freeze int then agree and pay that creditor

if any refuse send the £1PCM letter and stick to it!

 

I would guess all of her credit is post 2007 so little point in a CCA request as debts are still owned by the original creditors?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ive found the letter she needs to send

 

Some have gone to debt collectors does she write to the original creditor or the debt collector?

 

 

 

Also one of the debts is from company called safety net credit who had constant access to her bank account and would snatch money off her when it went in then re lend it her . I got her to have her wages paid into a different account. are these a legit company when she shown be the account it was hard to understand.

Edited by worriedmum1972
Link to post
Share on other sites

Urm they are terrible lot!!

Poss needs its own thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as for the dca's are they simply collecting for their client to OC's or are the owners?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PAYDAY LOANS

Safety Net – Credit Resource Solutions ltd - £594.00 collecting on behalf

Lending Stream -

Loan one - - £288.59 £48.62 2 payments behind

Loan Two - - £273.08 £54.37 2 payments behind

--------------------

CREDIT CARDS

 

BARCLAYCARD - - £550.00 default

CAPITAL ONE – £499.49 one payment missed

------------------

CATALOGUES

 

FASHIONWORLD – balance £1769.94 had payment plan but still adding interest -last paid 24th aug

LITTLEWOODS - £961.79 last made a payment 2nd oct of £20.00 arrears £912.68 Account Limit £1025.00

VERY –£1349.06 last payment made £50.00 24th Aug - Arrears £540.00 Limit £1200.00

-------------

Loans

118118 – £7171.77 – Default

Provident - £400 = No contact for 12 months from them

 

Moorcroft tesco phone contract £799.00 paying £30.00 upto date collecting on behalf

Edited by worriedmum1972
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop paying that money to moorcroft!!

Probably unlawful full term contract payments??

Not using it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes she missed two payments on her contract and they cancelled the contract she even tried to pay the missed two payments but they wouldn't let her just passed it over. It was her second contract with tesco and had never missed a payment before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant charge her the remaining months of a contract /service she is not using..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop paying let them sell it on.

Ofcom have clearly stated charging a customer till end of unused contract (outstanding months) is unfair termination penalty.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...