Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just as the title says, if ever there was a good reason to ditch Micro$oft and move to Linux then this is it :-   Giving Windows total recall is a privacy minefield • The Register WWW.THEREGISTER.COM It's only a preview, and maybe it should stay there ... forever Help is available, most modern PC's can run a version of Linux suitable for your needs and it is not difficult to use or learn. Ubuntu is popular, new version is very modern Garuda Linux is the one I use, based on Arch, rolling release, bang up to date. I have friends and acquaintances, old and young, PC Literate and not. Most people who try it never go back to Windows Hamster
    • I've had to hide two of your posts.  Anyone clicking on your links gets sent to external sites.  On top of that your real name is showing on one screenshot.  Fellow Site Team member dx100uk has already politely asked - Anyway, jk2054 wants to see the communication you got from your local court which will have told you about the hearing date of 17 June, and will have mentioned a deadline for filing your Witness Statement.
    • I believe it is helpful to seek guidance from a range of places and decide on the validity of the sources and frequency of responses which are most helpful. A single voice can be a dangerous thing. As, of course, can groupthink. Scott, it feels like £4k on a solicitor for a £1.5k bill is overkill. Were we back in time I'd suggest small claims court as your claim sounds like it may be straightforward? By all means add that phrase on. I also suggest you contact the court and go and sit in on a couple of similar cases to get a better understanding before you shell out.
    • a card should be 16 digits...urm... note your dates above please. do not miss them no matter what happens  ......................... pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northamton, civil national business centre Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group Uk Portfolios ltd. How many defendant's  joint or self ? self Date of issue –  21 May 24 date of AOS - 07-06-2024 date for filing defence by - 21-06-2024 Particulars of Claim 1. The claimant claims the sum of £5600 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On Mar 2000 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Barclays Bank Uk PLC for a credit card under reference ( 11 digit ref ). 3. on Mar 21 the defendant defaulted on the agreement  with an outstanding balance of £5600. 4. On Aug 21 the debt £5600 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on Dec 23. 5. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property act 1925. 6. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £5600 What is the total value of the claim? £6100  Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No - just emails threatening action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? before - in 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I don't recall - I suspect post / online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? am awaiting access - but I suspect it is    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. assigned - debt purchaser has issued the claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Pretty certain - Yes   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? pretty certain - Yes   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? there's been gaps - they went very quiet  Why did you cease payments? Covid lockdowns  What was the date of your last payment? i thought it was 2020 - they say 2021 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NCP ANPR PCN - NCP Lincoln Central **CANCELLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI

I drove into the NCP in Lincoln several times over the last few weeks to collect keys from an office behind.

I park in the private car park at the back.

You have to drive through the NCP to get to it.

 

I have received a PCN for £100 as they clocked me going in and then leaving 19 mins later. I didnt park in their car park!!!

I will get several more of these over the next few days so am livid.

 

Surely they cannot charge you to drive through their car park, it is the only entrance to the private one at the back that they dont own.

 

Also, now they photograph you arriving and leaving does that mean i cant wait in there anymore for my disabled partner?

They are getting bad.

Any advice appreciated

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Before we advise, can you fill this out please

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket&p=4883055&viewfull=1#post4883055

 

Please ensure you say exactly which car park this is.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that driving through their car park is the only available access to the private land?

 

Who is the owner of the NCP car park?

 

Who is the owner of the carpark you are getting to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who owns the office that you go to? Do they have the right to use the private car park and are they entitled to grant permission to people like yourselves who visit the office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For tickets received through the post (Notice to Keeper) please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement: 15/03/2018

2 Date on the NTK: 03/04/18

3 Date received: 06/04/18

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? No

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, front of car entering and back of car leaving. No photos of car stationery

 

6 Have you appealed? Not yet

Have you had a response?

 

7 Who is the parking company? NCP

 

8. Where is the car park? NCP Lincoln Central – free school lane lincoln

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check here

 

BPA

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the dates you have given, the Notice to Keeper is Out of Time. This must be received by the keeper within 14 days as it is a camera controlled car park (ANPR)

 

Looking on Google, it seems there is only one entrance/exit to the site therefore (and if it can be proved) the private car park is a separate entity to the NCP car park and should be treated as separate land.

 

NCP are usually good with appeals and rarely take court action. Can you revisit the site and take pictures of all the signs and especially where you parked. Any signs that are different to the NCP ones should be photographed.

 

As for an appeal. Personally, I would go for it but without mentioning they are out of time. Keep that under your hat for later

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good old No Clue Parking.

 

If you can answer the questions at post #5 that'll help.

 

 

If the only access to the private car park is via the NCP, the people that own/lease the car park that you're going to must have some kind of agreement with NCP. I'd be asking them first if they can help.

 

Failing that, as silverfox has said, according to the dates that you've given, this is going absolutely nowhere anyway. They're out of time to create keeper liability, so as long as they don't find out who the driver was they've got no chance!

 

You'll get all the usual threat-o-grams of course, but this isn't going anywhere near a court.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who owns the office that you go to? Do they have the right to use the private car park and are they entitled to grant permission to people like yourselves who visit the office?

 

Good old No Clue Parking.

 

If you can answer the questions at post #5 that'll help.

 

 

I'm not sure that we have received these answers yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

no contract between you and them and anyways,

they are breaching the DPA by even recording your number plate and then processing that data!

 

they will owe you money if you wish to pursue this but what I would do is ask the company whose land you visited what they do about false claims.

 

PE have to run a whitelist in a couple of locations where there is a right of access over land their cameras stare at and they will be fined a massive sum if they get it wrong so no reason to suppose that the same is not a possibility here.

 

Once you have this info them a short letter telling them that they are wrong and will be in trouble if they continue to harass you should the end

 

the matter. If it doesnt they are still wrong but you have more options depending on how far you want to take it

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help us if we knew where you were actually visiting and the place you parked. You can do a screenshot of the car park from google earth and then put a cross where you parked and of course any signs that differ from the NCP ones.

 

Your basic appeal is one of that you didn't park on any relevant land as the parking area visited was not part of the NCP car park.

 

Also, read the NTK again. DVLA do not give out details of the driver, only the keeper so any appeal MUST NOT include the drivers name. Just say, 'The Driver' If you ever did give them your name as the driver, this would negate any action you take and make things easier for NCP to chase the driver.

 

PE have to run a whitelist in a couple of locations where there is a right of access over land their cameras stare at and they will be fined a massive sum if they get it wrong so no reason to suppose that the same is not a possibility here.

Erm! was this just an example or are you thinking this thread is a PE one?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems we have another person who seeks advice but then won't engage with this thread.

 

It makes it very difficult for all the highly motivated people who want to provide support

Link to post
Share on other sites

The office I go to has 1 space in this porivate car park, the others beking to other offices, i always use it if empty as it is private

 

Thanks, im off down tomorrow and will take photos etc so will know more then. In the m eantime do i reply to NCP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who owns the office that you go to? Do they have the right to use the private car park and are they entitled to grant permission to people like yourselves who visit the office?

 

The office I go to has 1 space in this porivate car park, the others beking to other offices, i always use it if empty as it is private

 

Thanks, im off down tomorrow and will take photos etc so will know more then. In the m eantime do i reply to NCP

 

we are trying desperately to work out if you should reply to NCP and what you should say. However, you are making it extremely difficult because you won't actually address the questions which are being put.

 

It's a bit like pulling teeth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer silverfox's question, yes I was using it as an example because these clowns should be doing the same so that way you and others dont get harassed and they dont drag people to court and lose when there is a very simple alternative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest - NCP DO NOT Own the land that the Serco car park is on. The only way to access the Serco car park is by entering the NCP car park/

. Serco have had a lot of trouble from NCP n the last few weeks andf cancelled a few tickets

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest - NCP DO NOT Own the land that the Serco car park is on. The only way to access the Serco car park is by entering the NCP car park/

. Serco have had a lot of trouble from NCP n the last few weeks andf cancelled a few tickets

In that case has SERCO got an unrestricted right of way accross that NCP carpark for vehicles accessing it? Wonder if DPD, DHL and Yodel keep getting ticketed for delivering to SERCO?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as the land is owned by a company with no financial link to NCP then this charge should be cancelled. There is no liability for crossing land to get to another site. NCP should have ensured that the vehicle actually parked on the land in question before going to the DVLA and as such, they are in breach of th KADOE contract they have with DVLA and should be reported. There is also potential for a breach of the Data Protection Act by accessing data they had no right to have in the first place.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem for NCP is that their poxy ANPR only tags vehicles in and out, it has no camera probably that logs who is going in and out of SERCO, something it needs to be able to say that the vehicle actually parked in their area. and didn't just drive through to access SERCO.

 

I think if they were silly enough to do court proof that SERCO was the destination along with a right of way to access would blow them out of the water.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry can you please post up the letter where they use the word FINE?

 

Pop all those pic into ONE multipage PDF so we can zoom them

Read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, hang on a minute. :|

 

You've got a NtK From NCP? That sign says UKCPS.

 

 

If I'm correct on both counts, even ignoring the Serco private parking area, this is going to be an easy win :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. At the entry to the site it clearly states NCP yet that sign says UKCPS. there is an NCP sign as well in the picture but further back.

 

It can't be stated more clearly than the road markings showing the SERCO so NCP have no claim on the land in question. A pretty poor show from NCP as they obviously haven't though this out properly.

 

I wouldn't even bother with an appeal, just a simple letter stating that there is no cause of action as 'The Driver' did not park in that car park I would also complain to the DVLA as NCP have obtained your private data with no grounds

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

mke sure that your letter is very firm., no mention of appeals just a plain worded you are wrong (for several reasons but the not parking bit should be the only one you need to mention) and that if they dont cease this nonsense you are minded to take action against them for the unlawful processing of your personal data as per VCS v Phillip Liverpool CC dec 2017.

 

They generally dont take any notice of threats of being sued but mention a specific case where they knwo the outcome is certain they should actually take notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...