Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Update on the future of DWP jobcentres


stu007
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Update on the future of DWP jobcentres

DWP confirms that some smaller jobcentres will merge with larger ones, and others will be co-located within local government premises.

 

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has published more details on the future of DWP jobcentres.

 

Damian Hinds, Minister for Employment (July 2016 to January 2018), said:

 

"We will always make sure that people have the support they need to get into and progress within work. These changes reflect the fact that more people access their benefits online resulting in many of our buildings being underused.

 

The changes DWP is making to its estate across the country will offer a more efficient service, and deliver good value for the taxpayer."

 

READ MORE HERE: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/update-on-the-future-of-dwp-jobcentres

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I alone in hoping that many of the staff are laid off and so have to sign on!

 

A significant number of public facing staff at the DWP will be on fixed short term contracts or from an agency. These people can be made "redundant" and the figures can be used by the spin doctors in a variety of ways.

 

As an example, one large employer I know will regularly announce having to cut 600 jobs and lay people off. The following week, the same employer is recruiting 750 people for their call centres via various employment agencies. The original 600 jobs that had been cut were from an outsourced call centre that had come to the end of contract and the new crop of 750 new jobs, were needed to service the new call centre contract.

 

As for the redundant DWP staff, quite a few would have been on flexi & part time contracts and having to sign up to Universal Credit to make ends meet. These unfortunate souls will already have had a taste of the DWP regime imposed on claimants.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope that we all understand

 

The public sector equality duty is a special duty that most public authorities (like government departments, local authorities, police forces and NHS hospitals) have to:

 

eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation

make sure people with a protected characteristic have the same opportunities as other people

https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/legal-rights/disability-discrimination/public-sector-equality-duty/

 

MIND keep changing the page! The last one had a template letter to the DWP which I modified and sent to my local CMHT with surprising effect

 

I use to be able to get to X with Y help.... now that you have closed X in order to get to Z I would require an adjustment of.....

 

GO get em :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a copy of MINDs GP letter

 

 

[Your address]

 

To the Practice Manager

[Your National Health Service number, if you know it]

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Request for reasonable adjustments

 

I am writing to ask you to make a reasonable adjustment for me under the Equality Act 2010 because of my mental health problems which make it very difficult for me to access your surgery for appointments with the nurse and my doctor.

 

[Describe your mental health problem and how this is making it more difficult for you at the moment]

 

As my GP will confirm, I have experienced long term problems with anxiety and have been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Because of my agitation I find that I am unable to remember the advice I was given at a consultation

[Explain what changes you want]

Because of this I would be grateful if the nurse and the GP and receptionists at the practice could make the following reasonable adjustment for me:

 

• The GP and the nurse to write down any key advice in a handwritten note at the time I am in the surgery so that I have an aide memoire of what has been said when I leave.

 

[Explain what the law is]

 

I am advised that the Equality Act applies to GP surgeries as they provide services. Under the Equality Act, you have a duty to make reasonable adjustments (changes) for people who have disabilities when their disability makes it difficult for them to access your services compared with someone who does not have that disability.

I hope you can confirm that you can agree to make these changes so that I can use your services.

 

Thank you.

 

Regards

[Your full name]

 

My tailored letter to my CMHT

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

I am writing to ask you to make a reasonable adjustment for me under the Equality Act 2010 because of my mental health problems which make it very difficult for me to access your location in XXXXX for appointments.

 

I am also further requesting that XXXXX who I am currently assigned to is either re-educated or replaced with somebody who understands both my condition and their duty to make said adjustments.

 

In order to understand my issues you need to understand the implications of Social Security Tribunal decision CE/1537/2013

 

Judge Gray refers to CE/4183/2012. She goes on to say –

‘... to effect treatment for a mental health condition, one may be able to summon up reserves to attend such an appointment that may not be sufficient in relation to a test which is of the ability to perform an activity reliably and repeatedly.’ (paragraph 18)

 

To put this into context for you;

the effort I’m having to put into an appointment with you at your XXXXX offices is too much for me. This then starts impacting all other areas of my life which then grind to an abrupt halt. This is further compounded by the fact that at the end of each appointment the person who I’m seeing is not only dictating extremely inappropriate future appointments, he is actively refusing to alter his decision when informed of the harm they will do to me.

 

Currently although informed that I had a NeuroPsychiatry appointment on the XX and a GP appointment on the XX XXXXX decided that the XX would be our next appointment. When I said no XXXXX went as far as suggesting that I cancel my GP appointment. This is similar to our 1st appointment (XX) when after being told of the issues I faced over the XX period, which I repeated to XX XX still enforced an appointment on the XX.

 

I have now started having panic attacks whilst out even when on Diazepam which can be directly linked to these appointments. My level of self neglect has also risen markedly to quite a concerning point as my ability to care for myself has dropped as a result.

 

Because of this I would be grateful if you could make the following reasonable adjustments for me:

 

1, the current appointment of XX cancelled with immediate effect.

2, a new appointment booked on or after XX.

3, all appointments occur between the hours of 10am and 2pm.

4, either a closer venue to myself is found or a taxi booked by yourselves to get me to your XXXXX offices. I’ll pay for it but will be unable to book it. Eliminating my current 50 minute walk from almost XX Town Hall up XX and along the length of the extremely busy XX Road would go a long way.

5, an emergency way to contact you other than via telephone.

6, a change in the person who I see.

 

I am advised that the Equality Act applies to Mental Health teams as they provide services. Under the Equality Act, you have a duty to make reasonable adjustments (changes) for people who have disabilities when their disability makes it difficult for them to access your services compared with someone who does not have that disability.

I hope you can confirm that you can agree to make these changes so that I can use your services.

 

 

I've got an appointment with the CMHT at my local 10-15 mins walk hospital on the back of that so.....

 

 

My local job centre is going so since my ESA wifi person - nice lady :-D In fact can't fault her as she's lovely :whoo:- has told me my next appointment will be at busy place down

a few busy busy High St's far far away. plus it's mangers discretion on which JCP you attend I'm intending to ask for a switch using another letter (same as above) to my preferred JCP office (there's 3) over their preferred!

 

Try it! But don't push it.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Job centre closures is down to a number of factors. Government is encouraging shared office use between DWP and local council authorities.

 

Government is also encouraging more use of internet and Job Centre work coaches are there to validate document evidence for benefits, as well as making sure claimants are searching for work. If a claimant has a problem, they phone a service centre or use an online journal.

 

I can see the UC service centres becoming much more involved with what Job Centre work coaches are currently doing. Once all documents can be uploaded to UC by claimants and most aspects are digital, most work search review checks and other current DWP requirements will be done by phone or by online discussion with claimants. The Job Centres will see claimants less often.

 

The Job Centres will not be equipped with enough staff to handle face to face interviews and enquiries from the 7 million claimants who are expected to be on UC by the end of 2022.

 

Unemployment is currently low according to official stats, but it looks like there will be lots of redundancies in the retail sector in the next few years. And with greater use of technology, I can see unemployment increasing significantly.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I alone in hoping that many of the staff are laid off and so have to sign on! :lol:

 

But if the job centres shut down, it also affects the public too. If my local one closes, I've got no idea at all where my local one will be. I know there's one some 6 miles away though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been suffering due to illness thanks, which has been made much worse by the actions taken by the DWP, JCP staff and the evil assessment process!

I would like each one of them follow a claimant through the whole process to really see how badly people are treated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been suffering due to illness thanks, which has been made much worse by the actions taken by the DWP, JCP staff and the evil assessment process!

I would like each one of them follow a claimant through the whole process to really see how badly people are treated.

 

Sorry to hear about your illness, but do you really think each and every person who works for the DWP has it in for you? You don't think that they must follow procedures that are passed down from above?

 

Thousands of worker's lives will be massively affected by this. I think you should show more compassion.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic posts removed and thread tided.....please keep this civil with no further personal posts.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are all too quick to blame the front line staff when things go wrong. Unfortunately, they are caught up in having to follow government policy, a disfunctional institution entrenched in its ways, and very restricted in what they can do. There are some good people working within the DWP, but they are buried in red tape & procedures that have to be followed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...