Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CCJ Teressa/ELS CCJ/CO - old Blackhorse Car Finance Loan


jcmate
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:???::noidea::noidea::noidea:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

what do you mean by joint account ownership.......!!!!

 

really getting frustrated that you cant be bothered to spell check what you are writing/posting unless you have pers issues whereby you cant help it - its really not on in this day and age if you want our help

 

is your home the charge is against jointly owned YES OR NO

 

but i'll cut to the chase

 

if you home is joinly owned

BUT the charging orders are only for debts own by YOU

then your have a restriction K charge

that CANNOT stop you selling.

 

id ask you to type out what the charge says...but I have my doubts it will be verbatum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im new to this but thank you, my solicitor should know this too

i will tell you again

the black horse account is in my name only = yes

the mortgage is a joint account in both our names = yes

i hope that clarifies?

my solicitor has got the charging order and deeds

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then its a restriction k

you don't need to clear it before you sell

get a proper solicitor that understands charging orders and restriction K PROPERLY.

so you should be sorted now

good.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

i must say she was quite shocked but made me pay it,

 

so after finding out so much on here

i will be taking them to court even Teressa email is still being used even the debt was bought in 2012 and terassa had gone in liquidation and they're to numerous to name

but intend to take them to court to prove there's so many working together to make money

i only found when i tried to sell my place

i know im right

also arrow global knew nothing about it until i told them

then was 2 of the same accounts by blackhorse both via terrassa,

who seen have got their emails back even if they are home in name only, and a certain m cole was able to help even though he said the debt was sold on,

its a real mess but they know the courts cant handle it, and my solicitor's a  waste of time she was more worried by the buyer not me,

i think its a disgrace and its rife,

stands to 2 reason that Blackhorse would not give me anther loan if i had not paid any off the 1st one.

theres loads of dodgy dealing everyone should check i think its rife ,

i think its the same loan sold twice

all of a sudden arrow cancelled that debt but still leaving the big one

i will keep u informed

great help to me,

infact i told the court who didnt know,

i am better not employing solicitor,

they know that the courts are giving them out like sweets and no one seems to get paper or say its been thrown out,

i must say that my address which i let in 2002 was getting letters from 2006 but they didnt buy the debt till 2012

were they psychic, i have to say well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please copy your above post again here and edit in some line spacing and correct your spelling mistakes

 

Can't make head not tail of what you are saying!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

hello again

 

i agreed to pay this as my solicitor said they have to pay or not sell the house,

i said yes and would sort it out

after i told arrow global i was going to sort it out after all they are 2 accounts from the same company (terresa ex blackhorse)

They said there were 2,

i disputed this saying they must be the same account.

they then cancelled the 1st one saying it was too old but the 2nd one was on my flat as a charging order

i never had thing from arrow only that had sent a letter to my address.

i tried 2 letters to the bulk northampton and no reply,

i asked for the original ccj which i cant find anywhere

it was ex terresa 2007

they went bust 2010,

i found out who they were via s. cole solicitors.

i have never paid anything off this until now

im looking for a good solicitor to sort this out.

it seems they're so back door but they just won, buying debts of the year award.

i believe they all know each other.

southend court knew nothing of arrow global until i told them.

can i go to court to take them on

Link to post
Share on other sites

arrows/tessara portfolio/els cole are all the same lot.

 

its a restriction k

you don't need to clear it before you sell

get a proper solicitor that understands charging orders and restriction K PROPERLY.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
theoldrouge said:
in addition it will cost £155 to make an application to set aside

hi there

i didnt even know about mine it was on my deeds.an the court had no idea of them either

i have just had a reply from Northampton bulk via email,

they know nothing of the CCJ now as its to old

advised me to talk to South end court,

i contacted South end Court who also sent me an email,

they have no details or had been sent details of arrow global,

their last communication was from Els Cole only,

they knew nothing about arrow global until i advised them.

Funny they didn't tell me or the court?

i had the to release the charge order and pay it,

my solicitor was no help

,they advised me to for ease i think.

can i to try to get it back

i did tell my solicitor i would be trying to

is it worth it you think?

i never had paper work from arrow global until i contacted them

thank you

jcmate

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you paid it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you have too?

it was a restriction k only

 

who said you had to pay it

and why did you pay it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

jcmate said:
hi there

i didnt even know about mine it was on my deeds.an the court had no idea of them either

jcmate

thread is +4yrs old

what thread of yours is this reply related too?

well we told you about that ages ago and that you didn't need to pay it...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so that was MBNA too?

yes stop listening to people that have no idea what they are doing!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

to late 'mug' you've paid them...would be the answer...

and as no-one has any records now...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will take them to court as they lied about 2 accounts to get out f it

Southend court said they didn’t hear from them

I had bad advice from my solicitor

I will try it’s £12.890 they robbed me it’s A right [problem]

 

Thanks

 

How do they get away with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt after all this time you will be able too.

 

the bottom line here is that solicitor should not have paid the restriction k off..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Haha never believe a lying dca!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...