Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Phil and Alison V Northern Rock (ERC)


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6284 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help with Costs

I enclose a copy of your Offer of Loan dated 10 February 2003, Section 15 clearly states, if you move your mortgage from us within the first two years following the date of completion of the Loan then the Help With Costs benefit of £1000 must be repaid in full.

Northern Rock pic disagrees entirely with the suggestion the Help With Costs Clawback is unlawful and unenforceable. This charge applied to your mortgage account represents a core term of the contract you have with Northern Rock pic. It goes directly to the heart of the bargain between you and Northern Rock pic. It does not represent any form of damages for breach of contract and is simply the agreed charge for early redemption of your mortgage. You were clearly and unambiguously notified of the charge, as an express term, prior to entering into the mortgage agreement.

 

Surely what is said in the first paragraph makes it a penalty?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Penalty provisions only come into play where there is a breach of contract. This is the point Jamorgan lost her case on. Whilst it may still be possible to establish a breach of contract, the issue is not as straight forward as with bank charges. So the chances of losing are increased.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mr and Mrs xxxxxxxx

Help with Costs Clawback and Discharge of Mortgage Fee (DOM)

Thank you for your letter dated 17 January 2007. Unfortunately, I can find no record of receiving your letter dated 2 January 2007, which is why it was not responded to.

As I understand it you are unhappy with the Help With Costs Clawback of £1000 and the Discharge of Mortgage Fee of £250, you paid when redeeming your account on 24 November 2004.

Help with Costs

I enclose a copy of your Offer of Loan dated 10 February 2003, Section 15 clearly states, if you move your mortgage from us within the first two years following the date of completion of the Loan then the Help With Costs benefit of £1000 must be repaid in full.

Northern Rock pic disagrees entirely with the suggestion the Help With Costs Clawback is unlawful and unenforceable. This charge applied to your mortgage account represents a core term of the contract you have with Northern Rock pic. It goes directly to the heart of the bargain between you and Northern Rock pic. It does not represent any form of damages for breach of contract and is simply the agreed charge for early redemption of your mortgage. You were clearly and unambiguously notified of the charge, as an express term, prior to entering into the mortgage agreement.

Discharge of Mortgage Fee

When you took out your original mortgage with us we provided you with a leaflet "Mortgage Costs in Black and White" - this is given to all our customers at the point of application for a Northern Rock mortgage and as such is standard procedure.

I am enclosing a copy of the leaflet from which you will see that the DOM Fee and the Despatch of Title Deeds Fee (now amalgamated and called the DOM fee) are clearly shown.

Since then we have provided regular notification, at least once each year, to show our latest fees and charges, particularly when we have made changes, by inclusion with your mortgage statements. These details have set out relevant fees at the level applicable at the time, including the DOM.

In addition your mortgage statements have made reference to the likely costs you will incur on redemption, and the DOM has specifically been clarified.

Our General Mortgage Conditions, by which you are bound, provide for our ability to make -and to increase - administration charges where applicable and a copy of this booklet was provided with your Offer of Loan.

Conclusion

In the circumstances there are no grounds upon which we can agree to refund the Help with Costs Clawback or the DOM Fee. We have been transparent in keeping you informed and therefore in disclosing the existence and the level of the fee in question.

That said, it is never our intention to be in dispute with our customers. When you took your mortgage out with us the Discharge of Mortgage Fee was £95 and the Despatch of Title Deeds Fee was £80 in total this is £175. As a gesture of goodwill I would like to offer you an ex gratia payment of £50. To accept my offer please sign and return the enclosed Acceptance Declaration using the envelope provided. It would be helpful if you could do so within the next 10 working days.

If however you feel unable to agree resolution because there are issues we have not fully addressed, please respond - preferably - in writing - setting out clearly your reasons and the additional information you would like us to consider.

I look forward to hearing from you and if you are unable to reply within the time-frame given above please let me know as soon as possible (my direct line is 0191 279 8003).

I enclose a copy of our Internal Complaints Procedure, which confirms how we handle complaints.

Yours sincerely

ta r&L •

Linda Christie Customer Support

Enclosure(s) Mortgage Costs in Black & White Acceptance Declaration Envelope

Internal Complaints Procedures Offer of Loan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would they offer us anything if they are right ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are offering you some money back from the "discharge of mortgage fee" because the FSA have intervened and say mortgage companies can't hike the cost up from what it was when you intially took the mortgage out.

A lot of people are getting some money back for this fee or otherwise known as exit fee/deeds fee.

 

I am not sure whether the "help with costs is technically a penalty" as its just a form of cashback mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

Has anyone had any success, or is in the process of claiming against Northern Rock, re. their "Help with costs Clawback" charge (£1000 in our case) and Discharge Of Mortgage Fee (£225) upon redemption of a mortgage?

Northern Rock have said that our initial offer stated "if you move your mortgage from us within the first 2 years following the date of completion of the loan then the Help With Costs benefir of £1000 must be repaid in full" and "it does not represent any form of damages for breach of contract and is simpy the agreed charge for early redemption of your mortgage" surely this is then a form of ERC?

Any advice greatfully accepted,

Thanks

Phatram

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to claim some of the £225 discharge fee after the FSA investigated the banks' inordinate increase in this area. If this amount differs from the fee quoted in your original paperwork when you took the mortgage out, you can reclaim the difference.

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume this is just their name for 'Early Redemption Fee'. What it implies is that there is a cost involved to them for you ending your mortgage early and this helps towards clawing it back, i.e. a standard ERC.

 

If you look at other threads you will see this is not easy to reclaim at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Northern Rock mortgage? Is it reclaimable as a penalty charge when redeeming early?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...