Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dispute with British Gas Business, advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2549 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My business, a pub company, had been a customer of British Gas for 8 years for both electricity and gas.

 

As both these contracts were due to end in January 2017

I agreed terms and rates to renew with British Gas once again through my broker.

 

For reasons that are unclear to me British Gas declined to honour the agreed terms at the last minute and forced me to find an alternative supplier.

 

My broker suggested it was because my business had no trading history, which is absurd as I have been trading since 2009 and have been with BG for the entire time.

 

I then started to receive a series of 'final' bills from BG.

The first set of bills, for both electricity and gas, were for the period up to 30th January 2017

- my contract end date. The rates applied to these bills were as expected and the consumption was inline with previous years and were duly paid.

 

I then received a second set of 'final' bills,

with new account numbers, up to the 28th Feb 2017 for electricity and up to 9th March 2017 for gas.

 

My rates had changed to 'out of contract' rates and my consumption had supposedly more than tripled compared to previous years.

 

As a pub our electricity consumption barely changes from one month to the next, it powers the lights, fridges and freezers, and is pretty consistent.

 

The gas powers the ovens in the kitchen, the central heating and hot water and can go up in the winter months. But considering February and March weren't particularly cold this year the increase in consumption that BG are claiming is hard to believe.

 

The upshot of it all is that I now have outstanding 'final' invoices from BG for approx. £7,000, instead of the £2,500 that I might have expected. Added to which, the rates I was able to negotiate with my new supplier at the last minute are significantly worse than I had agreed with BG.

 

I have refused to pay these invoices and believe that the consumption BG are claiming is wrong.

I also think that they should honour the rates we had agreed for the new contract on these last bills rather than apply 'out of contract' rates.

 

They have chosen to pass the accounts to Debt Collection companies,

claiming I have made no attempt to resolve the issue,

which is not true.

 

Instead BG are choosing to ignore my complaints.

 

Should I continue to fight this and if so, how ?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the readings and check

 

sadly they are quite entitled to charge their out of contract rate.

 

you left it rather late to sort this out too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that this story raises some very interesting issues and I'd be keen to explore them with you.

 

My starting position here is that all the utilities companies use a system of "deemed contracts" when dealing with out-of-contract situations. We normally come across this with consumers who have moved into new properties and haven't set up their utility contracts yet – but it happens with businesses as well.

 

A deemed contract is an industry practice which apparently allows the energy supplier's to apply whatever terms they want to their new customer until that customer has formally entered into a more advantageous contract. Of course, the terms of a deemed contract are extremely advantageous to the supplier. I have always thought that these are extremely unfair and unenforceable. It has been a long-standing principle under sale of goods legislation that where two parties enter into an agreement and no price has been fixed, then "a reasonable price" will be implied. The principle of deemed contracts has never been challenged so far as I know – and it should be because I think that it is unlawful.

 

I see a similar kind of principle of deemed contracts operating here.

 

I'd like to know more about the story.

 

So far as I understand, you have had a successful series of contracts with British Gas for eight years on certain terms. You have been negotiating British Gas for a renewal but suddenly they have refused to continue with you and you don't understand why.

 

As a result, they have put you on to some "deemed contract" which of course is at their most punitive rate.

 

I think that they are probably acting unlawfully and I think that this could be open to challenge.

 

Separately I would like to know at what point they suddenly decided not to contract with you. You are apparently doing this through a broker. How does that work? Why do you do this?

 

Could you give me a little chronological detail as to when you began the negotiation and how close it was to the termination date of your existing arrangement, that British Gas suddenly decided not to supply you any more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it all business energy contracts are listed on a database which is accessible to energy brokers and utility companies. As you approach the end of your contract you start to get inundated with calls, mainly from brokers, offering to negotiate new deals for you. Whether they do actually negotiate deals or just have cosy arrangements with their 'favourite' companies who give them the best commission is open to question. Nonetheless it takes the leg work out of searching for deals and you can play one broker off against another to try and get a good deal.

 

This process started in June 2016 and I agreed prices with British Gas, via a broker called Utilitywise, in July 2016. I have a confirmation letter from Utilitywise dated 21/07/16. In November 2016 I received a letter directly from British Gas saying I needed to agree new terms immediately otherwise I would be moved onto 'variable' rates in January 2017. I forwarded this to my broker querying why I had received this letter as we had already agreed new contracts. They assured me this must be an error as contracts were in place. I didn't receive any other warning letters so thought the issue was indeed resolved.

 

Then in January 2017, around the middle of the month, my broker came back to me and said BG had refused to honour our agreement as my company had no trading history! I obviously said this was nonsense but he confirmed BG weren't prepared to go ahead and we would have to find a new supplier. As of the end of January 2017 I was moved onto 'out of contract' rates even though we had agreed new deals with SSE, but apparently these could not go live until March 2017 because BG insisted on 30 days notice.

 

Then low and behold throughout February and early March, while 'out of contract' my consumption apparently tripled compared to the same months in previous years! As I have stated previously our electricity usage does not vary much and our gas usage can go up if the weather is particularly cold, but it wasn't this year.

 

I have tried both through my broker and by directly emailing BG to try and resolve these issues but I'm being ignored. BG have now passed both my electricity and gas accounts to debt collectors, claiming I have made no attempt to resolve the issue. By which they mean I've made no attempt to pay.

 

What can I do ?

Cheers, Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it seems that the issues here are that you may have agreed a contract in June 2016 – and if that's the case then British Gas may be in breach of that contract. If it turns out that there was no contract, and you have been placed on a "deemed" variable rate contract – at the most advantageous rate to British Gas (is that correct?). Is this huge bill the result of similar consumption to before but at the new rate? Or is it due to apparently increase consumption?

 

What correspondence have you got showing that prices were agreed? What evidence is there that a contract was in place as assured by your broker?

 

Also, I don't understand that British Gas said that your company had no trading history and yet they had previously given you a contract and in fact they wanted 30 days notice of the termination of that contract.

 

Do I understand that you are being ignored by your broker as well? Did you have any written agreement with your broker?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a letter from by broker confirming the prices and length of contract agreed with BG. I then went through a process whereby you agree contract terms over the phone, a verbal contract if you will, which is presumably recorded. Following that I received another email from my broker confirming that I have 'placed my energy contract through Utilitywise' and they attached a 'terms and conditions for SME's' from BG. At no point did I receive a physical contract from BG. I have a copy of the 'Letter of Authority' that I signed and agreed with my broker allowing them to act on my behalf.

 

I had some initial success communicating with BG who said they would investigate but they then passed me around different departments, customer service, resolutions department, finance etc etc. I have an open ticket with the customer services department and they asked me to provide all the different account numbers that relate to this issue. Having provided those on the 30th May I have had no further success in getting a response from BG despite follow up emails on the 8th and 14th June.

 

My broker tells me that he has spoken with BG and they have told him they believe the reads are correct and that I should pay. But as I am technically no longer a customer of BG my broker is no longer authorised to act on my behalf. Meaning he can wash his hands of the issue and I'm on my own.

 

As for the trading history issue. The only thing I can think off that might have caused some confusion is that my old invoices from BG were addressed to the pub (ie our trading name), whereas the new (final) ones received in February 2017 were addressed to my company. I'm not sure why this would be an issue as the contract signed in 2013, that expired in January 2017, was addressed and agreed with the company. And I have copies of those contracts from BG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you publish the letter here in PDF format. Also I suggest you read our customer services guide and having implemented the advice there that you call British Gas and see how much you can get them to admit over the phone. It may be able to get some useful information there.

 

Also, what would be the difference in the bill if the consumption which they claim had been charged at your normal contract rate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

I haven't noticed anywhere that it says that any contract has been agreed with British Gas in fact the documents that you have put up seem to be a list of possible prices and at some point it says that an agreement has to be signed with British Gas.

 

I'm not trying to criticise you – but I think we have to be very careful about this and we have to understand it all in great detail if we want to stand any chance of making headway.

 

In terms of your £1500 for gas and £1500 for electricity, had you been on the contractual rate, how does this compare with last year's bills?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it seems strange, but the verbal contract is supposidly binding. At least that is what you are told during the phone conversation. You are also told that having agreed terms you are not supposed to engage any other service provider. Having said that I have always received a subsequent physical contract from my energy provider eventually, but this arrives long after you have verbally agreed terms. This did not happen in this instance. Maybe I should request a copy of the verbal cotract ?

 

Last year my combined gas and electricty for the whole of Feb was £2100 and the whole of March £2400. This year they are charging me a combined figure of just over £7000 for the whole of Feb and 9 days of March.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a contract is binding. No problem about that. However, do you have evidence that there is a contract? Do you have evidence that a contract was agreed on the telephone?

 

Because you are typical of most businesses and most people, you have all sorts of conversations – very important conversations – with people and businesses on the telephone and you have absolutely no record that those conversations ever happened. Very often there is no problem but when there is a problem, then you find yourself in a position where it is your word against theirs and I'm afraid that if it comes to a court case (as it might easily do here) you won't have enough evidence to support your argument and to win your case.

 

So, what evidence do you have that there was any contract? On what you have shown so far, I haven't seen anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...