Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes that is correct.

 

The v5c with current address shows the date after three weeks of the contravention that's what I meant to say.

Apologies for the confusion.

 

Looking forward to your response on this.

Planning to get the forms witnessed in about hour so your help is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am now assuming that before you updated your V5c in July 2016 that the V5c had the adress of Property A.

 

When did you move from Property A?

 

When did you move from property B?

 

What date did you move into Property C (which I assume was July 2016)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now assuming that before you updated your V5c in July 2016 that the V5c had the adress of Property A. (No the address on v5c was the address of property B)

 

When did you move from Property A? Feb 2013

 

When did you move from property B? July 2014

 

What date did you move into Property C (which I assume was July 2016)? June 2016

 

I have been updating my v5c regularly but not sure why DVLA records are not getting updated.

 

DVLA not having my records up to date is the problem

as I had PCNs issued when I was living at my previous address

 

 

but due to the same reason (sent to old address)

I was able to get the owner to notice re initiated

and pay the charge as discounted rate

 

 

the only difference this time is I have got enforcement notice this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ "Bailiff Advise" - Are you clear on my issue or still confused? To make thsi straight forward this issue is due to DVLA not having my up to date record even though I have been updating my V5C regularly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where I am getting confused is because, in previous posts of yours dated 16th August 2015, you posted the following:

 

Quote
I have just came to know about two PCN notices sent to my old address. Those notices have been sent in April when the contravention occurred however I changed the address in July end last year and also have my V5C with current address since then.
Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the confusion

it is very clear that I moved to my old address in July 2014

(I also update my v5c after that) and contravention occurred in April 2015

(way after moving to another property and updating my v5c).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that you moved from Property B in July 2014 and that you then moved into Property C in June 2016. There must have been another property that you moved into between the period June 2014 to June 2016. But then again, on 16th August 2015, you did state that your V5C had your CURRENT address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am extremely apologetic, mistakenly put the dates when I moved in. Please see below with all the corrections.

 

When did you move from Property A? July 2014

 

When did you move from property B? June 2016

 

What date did you move into Property C (which I assume was July 2016)? 28th June 2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent draft wording to you this morning (which I considered should have sufficed).

 

You responded to say this:

 

Quote
Bailiff Advice - Thanks for the information. I would like to inform you that the communication regarding PCN went to my old address, even the one I used to live before the previous one

 

You then state this:

 

Quote

So seems like DVLA has not updated my record on their side even when I have been updating address on my V5c.

 

 

Can I just say, I have never before come across any situation where if a perosn updates their records on the V5C that the DVLA records are not updated at the same time.

 

rocky_sharma said:
I am extremely apologetic, mistakenly put the dates when I moved in. Please see below with all the corrections.

 

When did you move from Property A? July 2014

 

When did you move from property B? June 2016

 

What date did you move into Property C (which I assume was July 2016)? 28th June 2016

 

 

I think that I may know where the confusion is:

 

You moved from Property A in July 2014

 

Did you then move into property B and stay at property B for 2 years until moving out in July 2016 or was there ANOTHER address in between?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There wasn't any other property in between.

 

Stayed at property A moved to B and then C that's all.

 

Also updated my v5c accordingly in timely manner

I have a strong feeling that something is definitely wrong on DVLA side of the system or may be in the communication between council and DVLA.

 

Do you think that the wording you provided in the morning will not suffice?

and if that is the case are you going to provide me with altered statements?

Let me know so that I can plan accordingly.

 

I definitely want to submit it tomorrow,

I have arranged a solicitor as well for witnessing my signature

also have documents to prove that I moved to current address before contravention

and v5c with current address and will also send the scan copy of those as proof.

 

Just waiting for your advise as I want to make sure it doesn't get rejected.

 

I would like to mention two things here that

 

Address A is when I bought my car and also when I called TEC

the representative told me immediately after taking my PNC number and name that I am looking for out of witness form because I moved to a different address and then moved again.

 

Representative also confirmed that I need to fill in forms PE 2 and 3 and as soon as I send those back they will inform the council to suspend the order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read and reread this thread many times and I come back each time to your comment that you moved into your current address in June 2016 and that the contravention occurred in the same month and it was during July that you updated your records with DVLA.

 

When a contravention occurs, a statutory number of names must pass before the local authority can approach DVLA for keeper records. It seems that you were in the unfortunate position where the search of DVLA records was a couple of weeks before DVLA had processed your request to amend your Log Book. It really does seem that it is a simple as that.

 

The wording that I provided to you yesterday was to demonstrate to the local authority that you acted responsibly by updating your address details. Your case seems to be one that is just unfortunate.

 

I would suggest that you provide a copy of the updated V5C with your application as well. That will show the date that the logbook was updated and will again demonstrate that you have acted responsibly.

 

PS: In the short box on the PE3, I would suggest that you change the wording that you were intending putting ("I was not aware of it") and replace it with something more suitable such as:

 

Enquiries with the local authority have revealed that this penalty charge relates to a contravention that occurred in the same month that I moved into my current address. I updated my V5C with DVLA shortly after the contravention and accordingly, all notices from the council went to my previous address without my knowledge
.

 

Once last suggestion, it is always better to type the forms as opposed to handwriting them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the modified version by me please advise on any issue with it so that I can submit it today.

 

PE 2 wordings

 

I was not in a position to file this statement any sooner as it was not until 6th May 2017 when I received a letter at my current address from a bailiff company, that I was made aware of this penalty charge notice.

 

From enquiries made with the enforcement company, it would appear that the penalty charge related to a contravention on 19/07/2016 and that all notices in relation to this matter had been sent to my previous address at xxxx.

 

Unfortunately, I did not receive any of the notices as I had moved from that address in July 2014.

 

Every time when I moved address, I updated my V5C (Log Book) with DVLA and also have the latest V5c which I received on 08/08/2016. I am attaching a copy with this application.

 

As I had not received any of the previous notices from the council, I was unable to pay this charge at the earlier discounted rate and I am now being pursued by bailiffs. If this application is accepted and a new Notice to Owner issued, I will ensure that payment is made by return.

 

PE 3 wordings

 

"Enquiries with the local authority have revealed that this penalty charge relates to a contravention that occurred in the month following the month I moved into my current address. I updated my V5C with DVLA shortly after the contravention and accordingly, all notices from the council went to my previous address without my knowledge."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really sorry, but we are going around in circles here.

 

You have said today in your above statement that all notices in relation to this penalty had been sent to Property A which you moved out of in July 2014.

 

I cannot see how this could possibly be the case given that in August 2015 you wrote on another thread that your V5C was showing your CURRENT address (this would be property B). That's my only query.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I am not able to understand your confusion here. I moved out of property A in July 2014 means I moved into property B and also updated v5c so v5c was showing property B address but notices still went to old address A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today, I had a similar enquiry to yours and the debtor was so adamant that she had updated her address details on the V5C with DVLA. It trasnpsired that it had been her driving licence that she had updated and NOT her Log Book (V5C). Easy mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand but trust me I have my own to do list for places where I need to change my address after moving to new property as it is not only V5C or driving license

there are bank accounts, loyalty cards, online accounts and even my car insurance provider so I update all of those it just that due to other commitments I don't get time to do everything in one go.

 

 

I also have my driving license with current address so it is also not an issue.

As soon as I sort this out I want to call DVLA and sort this address issue out once and for all.

 

By the way to further update on my issue,

I have submitted email to TEC today together will V5C and all the proof.

Do you know what action TEC will take next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...