Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reclaim Fees from Kensington Mortgages


jkllwkgf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was repossessed by Kensington Mortgages in 2008, and the fee's and charges before and during this time were awful. Would it be too late for me to now try and reclaim these fee's as I now have very limited paperwork left?

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can recover the charges on the basis that it was money paid under a mistake. The time for recovering money paid under a mistake is six years beginning when you knew about the mistake or could reasonably have done so.

 

You have all information on your account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I have practically nothing :-( I have only realised as this morning I had a letter from Blenaim finance offering me a refund on miss-applied charges, and judging by the interest they are offering this will be a loan from around the same time. Whilst looking for further information, I noted that Kensington has been fined in 2010 for their unfair charges and so this got me thinking ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news on the reimbursement of charges. However, you need to make sure that these are properly calculated. Don't accept the first figure they offer you. Don't forget that by paying charges, you may have had to borrow money or increase an overdraft and of course paying the charges may have lengthen the period of paying off the loan. So you need all of this interest plus the interest on the sum that you eventually come up with. Don't forget that by having your money without your permission, they have been lending it out at fantastically high rates of interest. Whatever the calculation is, they will come out in profit.

 

In terms of your Kensington mortgage, you need to start writing to them and send them an SAR. You could also send an SAR to your bank in order to get statements showing how much you are paying. Even if you can only get statements relating to part of the time, you can then extrapolate the figures over the whole life of the loan. Once again, make sure that you take everything into account. In other words when you are made to pay charges unlawfully, there is a ripple effect and you need to take account of all of the ripples. You can be certain that the lender – the finance company – will try to limit their reimbursement to simply the charges and some interest but they won't really take all of the damage/losses that they have caused you into account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

Thank you so much for your replies, and deepest apologies for the delay in responding, I had a bereavement.

 

So, with regard to Together,

I called those and asked what the offer of a refund was for,

 

 

I was advised that this was due to a computer error, and nothing to do with the amount of the charges,

 

 

so whilst on the phone, I asked for a breakdown of all the charges that had been applied on my account.

 

 

It turns out that for the year the repossession was going through

i had been charged £2346,

for Letters (£35.25),

telephone calls(£30.00),

administration fees(£150.00)

and settlement quotes (55.00).

 

 

The account was closed on 3rd June 09

- do you think it is worth asking for these back given the timescale?

 

As for Kensington, I have not yet been in touch with them, but will write to them today :-)

 

Once again, thank you for your replies, and apologies for taking so long to come back to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mortgages companies can chase you for payment for 12 years, so I can't see any reason why you can't chase them for refunds for 12 years :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the interest they charged on them!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - none of those seem to apply to me reclaiming charges for a secured loan (The 4th one gives a nice view but no compound interest and the 3rd one is asking about payments etc) ) - also, do I reclaim everything, or everything above what is deemed reasonable i.e £12 for a letter (so for a £30 charge, just ask for £18 of that back?)

I am so sorry for all the questions

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to use the search CAG box of the red top toolbar

and read other reclaim threads.

 

 

you reclaim everything they charged you no matter of its value

 

 

and no you don't deduct £12 from each one.

not sure where you got that from

that's not what the FSA [then] said at all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can recover the charges on the basis that it was money paid under a mistake. The time for recovering money paid under a mistake is six years beginning when you knew about the mistake or could reasonably have done so.

 

You have all information on your account?

 

I went to the Fos with charges from 2006 to present but they ruled out on the 6 year and 3 year rules. Most of my extortionate charges were between 2006 or 2010 this is what I tried to claim back. They said it's because I should have known I had reason to complain as they had telephone transcripts between this date with me questioning the arrears. I was asking how I was still in arrears when I had paid what I owed (5 calls in in total.)I believe had they not had these I would have had more luck with the FOS. they ruled I was over the 6 and 3 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...