Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mil Collections Claimform re UKPO residential PCN - residents parking area at Albion mill Manchester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

Looking for a bit of help and direction here

On the 16th September

i had a letter from Mil Collections Saying debt purchased Letter before action

The letter was very vague and and The registration plate was for a car i had previously owned

i wanted to know more about the alleged debt as i didnt remember getting a parking charge

i wrote back and asked for more information ie copy of the ticket dates times Pictures if any.

I sent it recorded delivery and heard nothing back till i received a county court letter

The court letter had more information about the claim.

When i looked at it i realised that it wasnt me that was driving the vehicle at the time but a family member who was using the car whilst buying it off me paying me instalments monthly which is why the car was still in my name at that time of the alleged offence.

i never sent log book until all the payments had been paid off.

I have now received another letter from court with a hearing date etc at my local county court

Ive been looking around the web and have read up on Mil and looked at cases that they have taken to court and lost

Im not 100% sure how to attack this.

Should i send Mil a part 18 Request and ask for all the relevant information ie

The original deed of assignment

• A copy of the notice to driver

• A copy of the notice to keeper

• Photos of the Alleged vehicle causing the alleged offence

• A letter from the DVLA giving permission to use my data

And hope it puts a spanner in their works

or just go to court and see if i can get them to throw it out due to Mil ignoring my letter for more info?

Has anyone here had any experience with Mil?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it is part CPR 31.14 for disclosure and part 18 might not be relevant. The former is to ask for evidence mentioned in their claim. Part 18 is to ask questions.

 

What has the person who parked the car said about this ? Did they get a ticket on their windscreen ? Did they have permission by the permit holder of the parking space to park in this car park ? With some flats there are temporary permits for visitors.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***(1-Viewing)-nbsp

can you fill the above out please

and post up the defence you filed too.

you need to URGENTLY get a CPR 31:14 away to mils.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It was my Nieces Boyfriend who she is no longer with and doesnt speak to him so im not able to get any info from him im afraid/ :

Thanks for your response.

Initially when i received the court letter i just wrote back as my defence that i knew nothing of the Fine and i explained that i had wrote to mil to seek the information and they had ignored me.

I will fill out the above and get the cpr31:14 sent out tomorrow

Just looking at the cpr 13:14

It asks for the claimants solicitors but in actual fact this company are not representing anybody they have bought the debts and are now trying to take them to court themselves and represent themselves

ANDREAMOUR said:
Thanks for your response.

 

Initially when i received the court letter i just wrote back as my defence that i knew nothing of the charge and i explained that i had wrote to mil to seek the information and they had ignored me.

I will fill out the above and get the cpr31:14 sent out tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do hope you didn't use the word FINE in any letters nor in your defence

as that will tell them you really don't know what you are talking about or doing..

 

hence they've moved it fwd to allocation stage.

have you gotten the N180 back to them and the court

 

we need to see you full defence please

it will guide us upon how much water bailing we need to be doing for you.

 

and please do that other link I posted too

 

without those two we will be paddling around in circle.

 

mils are a DCA

there will be a name sols on the claimform

cpr goes to them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant Mil Collections

Date of issue 14th December 2016

( I opted to try mediation but they passed it back to the courts as I couldn’t mediate if I didn’t know exactly what I was mediating) 

Particulars of the claim

Charges for parking on Private land

1/The claimant purchased the debt on 14/09/2016 Assignment was sent 15/09/2016

2/ The defendant was the registered keeper and/or the driver of the vehicle at the time

The charge is as follows

Ref

***** OFFENCE: No Permit Location

***** RESIDENTS PARKING AREAS AT ********* Manchester DATE & TIME ***********

MAKE MODEL COLOUR ********

3/ The claimant wrote to the defendant 16/09/2016 informing of intention to issue a summons. No resolution achieved

THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1/Debt Amount £160

2/Administrative and collection fee £50

Total £210

The Claim has been issued by MIL

I wasn’t aware of any claim & I didn’t receive a notice of assignment

There is definitely no Solicitors Details on the Claim Form

and from looking around on other forums

these guys seem to represent them selves and most of the time dont have a representative in court

He we go this what i sent as my defence as i didnt really know what to say

Link to post
Share on other sites

last bits please

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

and have you been and taken photos of the signs there?

can you also scan up to PDF the letters you got

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont use solicitors, not even the likes of Gladstones or BWL will take these losers on.

Read all about them on the parking pranksters blog.

They dont like court as they ALWAYS lose as they have no locus standi.

reason is that the assignment of the debt isnt properly executed and these was no debt in the first place.

Yes, do the CPR 31.14 asking for proof of assignment from the landlord to enter into contracts and make civil claims in their own name for parking co,

proof of planning consent for the signage and equipment at the site,

proof that the terms offered, if forming a contract, were actually breached by way of photographic evidence and a copy of the letter of assignment of the debt that was sent to the debtor on the 15/09/16.

they wont be able to produce any of this.

In the meanwhile write to court and say that

"MIL have no locus standi and list some of the other cases where they have been ripped to shreds and say that they have no prospect of ever succeeding in their claim and that the Particulars of Claim do not fulfil the requirements of CPR 16 and rule 32.14 as MIL collections know that they are not true"

Your defence is unfortunately not going to defeat event their rubbish claim because it isnt a defence, it is a moan about the unfairness of it all and that will get you sympathy but no result

so get sending an addition to what you have said including the above statement and add

" In any case, the defendant was neither the driver nor the keeper at the time of the alleged breach so puts it to strict proof of a cause for action by the plaintiff against the defendant"

You will be obliged to send this to the court and the plaintiff.

( no bad thing, they may well drop the matter once they realise you are starting to use the right words

You now have to find out all about the original alleged breach.

This was a residential parking place so likely that it wont have the right permissions nor the right signage to form a contract so you need to get pictures of the signs to use when the case is allocated a date.

alos, clear your messages of old junk, it is not possible to message you until you do

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions....

I was not the driver of the vehicle.

My nieces boyfriend was buying the car from me and paying instalments.

the car was to be in my name till he had paid it off.

My niece isn't in contact with the lad anymore so can't get any information.

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Don't know

7 Who is the parking company? U.K. Parking patrol office Ltd  

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] residents parking area at Albion mill Manchester

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. No

 

 

 

 

PAPLOC+N1+N157.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so parking co is called UK parking patrol office? They joined the IPC in nov 2015 so their nTK wont have been POFA compliant.this is another point to make in your amended defence.

Have you still got the letter(NTK from them? That is more useful than everything you have posted up so far as it can kill the basis of any claim.

all of th above relates to a ticket, not a court claim.

Have you got rid of all of your junk messages in your in box yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent you a PM that may be helpful,

 

 

dont normally do this so let me know if it is useful to you or not.

 

Will continue to try and help here,

make sure you read up on MIL at the parkingpranksters blog as you can use the info there to help word your additional defence points

 

You havent read the post properly,

CPR 31.14 request for documents goes to MIL

 

A CPR 16 is request for strike out of claim and that goes to court,

either as part of your amended defence or as a separate document.

 

A copy of the amended claim should be sent to MIL,

you dont need to send a copy of the CPR 16 request to them.

 

Post up what you propose to say in the amended defence submission before you send it,

we may change words,

the order of things

or suggest additions.

 

 

Knowing what their signs say would be massively helpful,

do you know anyone who could photograph them and send them to you as an email attachment so we can have a look?

 

from what I can see on Google,

the signage is hidden,

you cant see it from the road

and the writing is very small

or it is not opbvious that a contract is being offered at all.

 

 

The wording of the contract may well be too vague or confusing to create an obligation

but that is a matter for the written evidence bundle you will have to exchanege before the matter is heard.

 

 

Do you have a date for the hearing yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will check out parking pranksters and get some case history for mill.

If need be I could take a trip to Manchester and get pictures.

 

Sorry I don't have any correspondence from the parking company. I have cleared my inbox

 

It has been transferred to Birmingham now and I have an initial date 9th May but the claimant needs to pay £25 hearing fee by 6th march or the case could be removed from the list

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep an eye on the clock,

if they are late paying

ask for the claim to be struck out

otherwise they may resurrect it at some point (unlikely)

If you ask for a strike out make sure you say that the POC is defective,

no chance of success based upon (list a load of others where they have fallen down)

and say that they are abusing the courts to try and coerce people into paying them when no monies could possibly be due to them as assignment of debt is improperly notified

forgot to ask, who signed the particulars of claim? MIL have a problem with using a fake name to sign off their forms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its signed by Alan Davies Managing Director.

 

Just Had a letter from DVLA with information of Companies that Have Requested My Details and there is nothing from Mil Or Uk Parking Patrol Office Ltd

 

I called the dvla to confirm this and they said i wasnt the owner of the vehicle on the date in question.

 

I think MIL have got their dates mixed up. ( :

 

DVLA are sending me an acquisition of disposal for the vehicle in question

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have asked the wrong question of the DVLA,

you were suppoed to ask WHO has accessed your details EVER,

not ask them about a company that has illegally bought the information from some other bandit.

 

 

You must read what is written here and elsewhwere very carefully so you dont make an assumption about what is said or asked for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PE dont pass on the info so nothing to do with them.

 

The DVLA have confirmed that the keeper details have been acquired but there seems to be an error so you need to go back to them and clarify this matter.

 

Also,

as part of your CPR 31.14 request

you need to ask for "strict proof" of who the driver was at the time of the event.

 

As your DVLA data indicates you weren't the keeper (!)

then the parking co must have been informed that you were the driver at the time by someone

so they will have to produce that info or admit that they don't have any evidence.

 

It could be that the family member got the NTK and decided to tell the that you were driving.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Mil Collections Claimform re UKPO residential PCN - residents parking area at Albion mill Manchester
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...