Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/? claimform - old Provident loan 'debt' ***Claim Discontinued***


MrJohnW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2683 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant - Lowell Portfolio I LTD

 

Date of issue – 17/01/2019

 

Date to acknowledge) = 04/02/17

 

 

Date to defence = by 4pm Friday 17/02/17

 

What is the claim for?

 

1) The Defendant entered into a consumer credit act 1974 regulated agreement with Provident personal Credit limited under account reference ********* ('the agreement').

 

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

3) The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 26/06/2015 and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2**.** remains due and outstanding

 

And the Claimant claims

a)the said sum of £2**.**

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.046, but limited to one year, being £16.92

C) Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £303.42

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Provident Doorstep loan

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim? Lowell,

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

 

Unable to tell as she didn't keep letters sent to her, but probably. She recalls letters from Lowell last year but it could be from something else. She has also moved 4 times since this was taken out.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

 

Unable to tell as she didn't keep letters sent to her, but probably.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

Unable to tell as she didn't keep letters sent to her, but probably.

 

Why did you cease payments? Agent never turned up.

 

What was the date of your last payment? She doesn't think she ever made a payment.

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

 

Does not turning up to collect count?

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

No, when no-one turned up she just ignored the problem.

 

 

Hi there,

 

Looking for some help for a freind.

She has had a claim form arrive this morning for an old Provident account from Lowell.

She thinks it may relate to a doorstep arrangement where the agent never turned up to collect but there is no paperwork provided to prove the claim(i thought they had to provide evidence to make a claim).

 

 

She thinks it dates back to 2009 so well out of the 6 years to chase (is that still a thing).

It is also in her old name and the address is incorrect but it arrived anyway (postman is pretty good).

 

 

She had quite a few debts and any letters that arrive in her old name that have debts info in it she RTS's them(I have told her not to do that again).

 

So, what now? Do I -

 

send a CCA Request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form

 

Fill in the return and Dispute the Claim?

Or Just Acknowledge service while awaiting the two above responses?

Do I have to tell the court I am doing so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it def statute barred then acknowledge the claim and file our statute barred defence

 

if its a doorstep loan then they'll never get paperwork on it anyay.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not 100% its over 6 years, but she thinks it is.

 

So deny claim and send the two letters asking for evidence?

 

Sorry, I might be just being dense but I cant see a way to edit my above post -

 

Should we -

 

Acknowledge Service and await responses from the CCA and CPR31.14

 

Or

 

Deny Claim and await responses from the CCA and CPR31.14

 

Or

 

Something else

Link to post
Share on other sites

there will be an agreement number in their POC.

go ring provi and ask the last payment date.

 

if they say no.[saying you have to contact now lowells-]

 

then state no that's not correct you as the original creditor MUST hold data for 6yrs under data protection lwas so stop messign me around. or you'll be reported as sonn as I put this phone down to the relevant authority...now my data please!!

 

if they say no they hold no data [without referring to lowells]

 

then clarify 'are you saying that you hold no data as the 6 yrs data retention time limit has expired?

 

 

if they yes theres your SB answer!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you don't want them to reply really!!

 

just DONT miss the defence filing date.

 

shame you couldn't simply get her to confirm the details they want and pass the phone to you.

that's what ive done for 35yrs dealing with these for other people

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just something to be aware of, when I sent a card request to Lowell for three provident loans they returned copies of the signed agreement but NOT the terms and conditions that were on the reverse. They then sent the account back to provident and I have heard nothing more.

 

Hope that is useful if they return anything

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

note

I've just update post 1

see your revised and correct dates

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Result :)

 

Letter today stating they cannot obtain the documents and will send a request to the court to discontinue. I assume I just need to check in with the court and make sure its actually been discontinued and thats the end of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must serve a copy of the Notice of Discontinuance on you also John

 

Looking good though and follows the normal process of all Lowell court claims.:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have confirmed with the court the case has been discontinued

 

however they have today sent another one.

 

Lowell and Provident again.

 

same situation except this one is not statute barred for sure as she thinks it dates to 2013

(apparently Provident used to come round regularly and offer her money but never turn up to collect).

This one is for £1988.28 plus costs.

 

Rinse and repeat? I assume it costs Lowell to start these claims?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes and yes

 

 

but start a new thread on it please and fill out that link we gave too

 

 

might be an idea you start an irresponsible lending complaint against provi me thinks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Will do that tomorrow when I see her again and have the document to hand.

 

I am helping her with her finances now so no more loans will be taken out. But she has had quite a few from provident over the years.

 

Many Thanks for the help.

 

Oh, in relation to the original claim she has not had a notice of discontinuance posted to her but the court confirmed it verbally to me over the phone. Is this something she needs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will mark this one as discontinued John

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...