Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Starmer cosying up to right wing outliers and Brexitish (who seem to be just pointing the fingers away from themselves for the failures resulting from what they financed and promoted) to the outrage of huge swathes of the party is a real problem IMO - probably the main thing that could generate vast quantities of 'I'm not voting' among regulars   Looks like hes taking the core for granted and embedding himself in the 'they have nowhere else to go fallacy' - well they may decide the else is redundant and they simply have nowhere to go
    • how did Paula Vennells, an ordained priest, fall so far and so fast from grace? - because she was never in grace - and always just another devil in shepherds clothing   Post Office scandal: how did Paula Vennells, an ordained priest, fall so far and so fast from grace? | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM The former chief executive and archbishop’s confidant appears at the Horizon IT inquiry this week to explain her role in the affair that wrecked the...  
    • I started paying her old council tax as they said they would jail her I managed to get those account details. We then got back together she moved in with me stopped me going to my house. Eventually let me back in I was there 4 days then the police showed up at 1am arrested me for 8 different offences. On the morning I was in custody she rang the letting agent and asked for the house to be changed to her sole name as I was in jail. The house was changed to her name I was made homeless. The bills she did not change to her name left them as occupier the utility companies then said I had to pay as there was lots more usage than an empty property. My solicitor said if I don't pay them I will be reported for it. It has since turned out that in her old property she didn't pay the bills. The electric bill she put in her daughter's name then cancelled the direct debit the council tax she never attempted to pay. Due to one of the accusations I have since been told I need to pay these bills even after getting emails saying I'm not liable for the bills. I have forwarded these on to the police and solicitors and had no reply. Other than you have to pay these bills. I'm also going to end up paying the bills where she lives now as once again they are not being paid. I can't go in to detail about the case as I'm due to be charged next week not sure what with yet but the police have told me I'm going to be charged.  My ex will not tell me nor can tell me about her debts as she doesn't want me to know how much debt she is in or has put her daughter in once she turned 18. I do not want to be paying her debts after what she has done to me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claim form - old cat debt***Claim Dismissed***


Tulip637
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2669 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No just your Witness statement .....CCA/CPR requests and responses and any exhibits referred to in your Witness statement......file with court and send a copy to the claimants solicitor...job done.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I got it all done and sent

. It was done yesterday but had printer problems the day before.

I emailed it to both the court and bw legal and also posted a copy to arrive today.

The court said that Was fine when I spoke to them.

 

They haven't sent anything though at all, so what happens now?

Could they be late with it?

What happens if they send nothing?

 

Also if they cancel it will my default be removed? I genuinely don't owe this money..

 

Thanks so much for all your help so far

 

Ok, scrap that last comment. Ive just received their witness statement which is requesting that my defence be struck out.

 

What do I do now?

Have I lost or is there still something to fight?

 

They have listed my account with everything I did order, and then some more stuff listed after I'd cleared the account.

 

I genuinely cannot remember ordering anything and furthermore believed the account to be closed.

But they have it listed on their thing so i wont be able to argue that will I?

 

The thing is if they'd supplied this statement when I asked them to last year id have just paid it, and now I have all the court fees to be added too.

Is there anything I can do?

Please help

 

I'm just looking theyve supplied a witness statement which is huge,

i thought my 16 points were too many but they have 47.

They've numbered their statement of truth and I haven't though, will that go against me too?

 

Theyve spent most of that proving i had an account, which i openly admitted to anyway.

Theyve supplied a full copy of the agreement.

 

Then theyve said I had a remaining £233 owing due to goods and an account overview thing which gives an over view of total amount of goods ordered and total amounts of payments.

 

Then it lists the payments made and actual goods ordered.

R After the last payment made the goods total theyve listed is for £298, not the £233 they say I owe.

 

Theyve not supplied the default notice or default warning letter, or a copy of the letter where theyve written to me to tell me theyve taken over the account or anything like that, just the agreement and the overview with the list of goods which doesn't match up price wise.

 

Actually id read the dates wrong, the amount of the goods ordered is £149 since my statement which proved that the balance was clear, but they're saying the total is £233

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual gumph then they sent if you go read other cat claim form threads

Loads of stuff that might indicate you had an account

But not the stuff they really need to produce to prove their claim

I.e the default notice

2 cases in the last week whereby fleecers lost due to its lacking

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or this forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really struggling to find the threads where the cases have been thrown out, are they on this bit of the forum?

 

What do I need to do now?

I've seen people mention submitting an extra defence, so I need to do this?

 

And skeleton arguments, are they to be submitted or are they just notes for me to use in court?

 

Lowell have put that they want the case dismissing and awarding to them,

and a couple of times they say that my argument is vague and one point says

 

The lack of any substance or supporting evidence to the defence limits the Claimant to the response they are able to file

 

Was .y witness statement and evidence not good enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell request that everyone's defence is struck out on the claims that they actually manage to submit a witness statement for ...so dont take it personally :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prepare for the hearing...read threads...research .....and read more...knowledge is power.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading loads, all the threads i can..

do I have to hand in any more?

 

 

I've seen mention of a supplemental witness statement and a skeleton argument, do I need those in my case?

 

And can anyone tell me what actually happens in court?

 

 

I think it's the not knowing what to expect that scares me most.

 

 

Ive not read any posts where peo0le say it how it happened,

just that it did if that makes sense..

 

That and being up against a solicitor who's experienced this loads and knows all the laws off the top of their head.

I think theyll try and wrap me up in knots..

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ..nothing further to submit....supplemental witness statements are submitted if you see something in the claimants statement that you only received late or last min after submitting yours and you wish to challenge and counter.

 

Skeleton arguments can be drafted nearer the trial date.

 

Well here is thread from this week which you have not read.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?441145-HPH2-claimform-old-HSBC-OD-prob-SB-d***Claim-Dismissed***/page8

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that I hadn't read the last bit and that's really useful.

 

I've read about them asking for a private chat at first,

and that they do it to try to get you to admit you owe it.

 

 

Mine isn't statute barred,

am I still ok to say no to speaking to them?

I don't want the judge to think I'm being unreasonable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to stop you listening...you dont need to respond...you may get a heads up on what they will rely on or arguing as their main line of claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I check as well,

they sent me a screenshot of their account for me with shop direct which has the basic details.

 

They haven't sent me a default notice or letter threatening or warning of a default notice.

 

Is this a valid argument in court?

It's one of the two things I'll be relying on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes they should follow the correct process as laid out in the CCA1974...whether a DJ sees it that way is another matter.....but the issuance of a default notice is important and a prerequisite to issuing a court claim

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I check as well,

they sent me a screenshot of their account for me with shop direct which has the basic details.

 

 

They haven't sent me a default notice or letter threatening or warning of a default notice.

 

 

Is this a valid argument in court?

It's one of the two things I'll be relying on

 

Is there any chance at all that you could post up a copy of their witness statement.....remove any personal or identifiable details first.

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I can post it up but it'll be morning before I get chance to go on the scanner. Im not sure how to redact my personal information from a pdf though.

It won't harm me if they see ive posted it on here will it?

 

Technically yes they should follow the correct process as laid out in the CCA1974...whether a DJ sees it that way is another matter.....but the issuance of a default notice is important and a prerequisite to issuing a court claim

 

We'll thats one part of my defence as i see it now, i thi k my defence is

 

1 that they've never sent a default notice, warning letter for a default or notice of Assignment to me. Ive never received any and theyve not included any with their witness statement either

 

2 they didn't respond to my cra letters or 31.14 requests.

 

3. The itemised statement amounts don't add up at all. The amount they say I owed is 85 more than the itemised statement showed i owed. I have proof that it was at 0 just before these random extra items were added. Theyve added their 100 fees on top of that.

 

 

As they've added their extra fees will they go for additional costs as well as that in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the upload guide

scan to JPG

redact in MSPAINT

then convert all the pix to ONE PDF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I can post it up but it'll be morning before I get chance to go on the scanner. Im not sure how to redact my personal information from a pdf though.

It won't harm me if they see ive posted it on here will it?

 

You have nothing to worry about. They're too busy filing speculative claims to be fishing about on here. Just make sure to remove your details, any reference numbers, etc.

 

We'll thats one part of my defence as i see it now, i thi k my defence is

 

1 that they've never sent a default notice, warning letter for a default or notice of Assignment to me. Ive never received any and theyve not included any with their witness statement either

 

2 they didn't respond to my cra letters or 31.14 requests.

 

3. The itemised statement amounts don't add up at all. The amount they say I owed is 85 more than the itemised statement showed i owed. I have proof that it was at 0 just before these random extra items were added. Theyve added their 100 fees on top of that.

 

Save these points for the hearing and outline them in a concise skeleton argument.

 

 

As they've added their extra fees will they go for additional costs as well as that in court?

 

No, they can't add anything further in Small Claims Track - except maybe if they went for Summary Judgement and your behaviour was deemed by the judge to unreasonable in some way. That won't apply here though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry its taken so long, I was getting so wound up about the whole court thing that I sort of tried to not to think about it for a few days.

 

I've uploaded the witness statement as suggested, but I've not included all of the credit agreement as it was pages and pages long and just the usual stuff.

 

Court on Thursday now, any help would be massively appreciated :!:

lowell WS.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conveniently nothing mentioned with regards to the OC issuing a default Notice :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

says lowells have it in their document store as a PDF mind?

page 10.

strange they printed out everything else on that list and not the DN???

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

says lowells have it in their document store as a PDF mind?

page 10.

strange they printed out everything else on that list and not the DN???

 

dx

 

 

I noticed that too. Ive never received one though and lowell haven't printed one either at my cca requests before or with this stuff. Nor like Andy said have they mentioned it. Will that go against me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no totally the otherway....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...