Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I have an old Capital One credit card debt under £1500 for which I've been paying £1 a month for 5+ years. I did a CCA request to Lowell and received the original signed CA plus statements from date of inception to the end of 2019. I can see from the statements that no payments were credited to the account for all of 2019. I know payments were made as they were part of my DMP with Payplan. At the time the account was with Fredrickson.  They have not provided any statements from 2020 to present and I am writing to them to request these. So I'm sure the balance they are pursuing is incorrect - can I dispute the debt amount based on this and render it unenforceable? I've trawled the forums and Google searched but can't find an answer, so apologies if it's been asked before. Any input most appreciated, thank you :-)  
    • Thank you for your comments everyone. I have spoken to Ico about recording my phone calls for my personal use and also mentioned it to a law firm they said i was ok as long as it was not shared and for my personal use. I would never share it. I can easy prove i need to record on disability grounds.. I normally make videos how i am to document my conditions and how i am affected. I have in the past obtained a phone call to doctors to reception by GDPR. Normally I have my partner with me now. The only way i found is to have a advocate with me. even with my partner with me a trainee gp seen a short video and said in front of my partner “are they voluntary or involuntary”   
    • LOL LOL ‘Stormy weather’: Biden skewers Trump at White House correspondents’ dinner | US elections 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM US president made fun of Republican frontrunner’s legal woes while critics of his handling of Gaza war protested outside  
    • LOL   Inside the Home Office Rwanda revolt as officials run from Sunak’s ‘s**t show’ INEWS.CO.UK 'This law is unworkable, not just inhumane'. Insiders say there is 'a lot of discontent' in the Department over the scheme   
    • wonder if sunak will revoke/deny their passports when they get there? Then announce that deportations to Rwanda have started ..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1696 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just sent this to Fos

 

Hi the last loan was started in Aug 2008. How is it out of jurisdiction?

 

However the very first Loan started in 2001 and there were numerous re writes in between .

 

The original owners of the loan were welcome finance. You could not help me last due to them entering a scheme of arrangement Re: Your complaint about Welcome Financial Services Limited (Our ref:

 

Now prime/Alpha are the owners and they are refusing to investigate my irresponsible lending complaint

 

This loan is now administered by acenden on behalf of creditor Prime Credit 5 S.à.r.l. or Alpha Credit Solutions 4 S.a.r.l.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok that sounds about right Andy already mentioned vexatious litigant after the last time it went to court. Am I able to submit new defence or add to first one? And where does it go straight to court? Can’t log in any more on PCOL to see anything

 

I haven’t replied to primes last letter on their final response yet. Anything to send to them or lightfoots

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received these. I thought prime tell the solicitors to issue claim not solicitors to inform them??

 

Figures are still wrong balance is showing at £18,190.63

 

sept 25th they said balance was £18,293.83

 

On the 10/10 their statement showed £18,040.73

 

In my letter to them on 17/10 I told them they were wrong and balance should be £17,989.03

letters.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see that bottom info lines again too please

 

the second lot is just a statement that they must send as they think they are a creditor under the CCA

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bottom bits

 

info lines who they are and who registered with etc

 

bottom inch of each letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On in court 2 weeks today.

 

What is it I need to be doing before I go? My file is in order all from this time last year.

 

I’m unsure if I have to fill a new defence. Write to anyone? Cos as it’s stands now I haven’t responded to them after they’ve restored the hearing.

 

Or even what my argument against them is to be or where I go with the judge.

 

If you give me some pointers I can get a draft drawn up.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

with the greatest respect your honour

the company trying to repo my old home is not even registered in the UK at companies house and is neither licenced with the FCA to carry out ANYTHING of a financial nature.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just my musings

 

p'haps ell-enn or andyorch might pop in as this new hearing is the 16th.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any paperwork from the court with regards to this hearing? If so if not already uploaded please scan/redact and upload.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is really limited advice to offer ...as the last hearing their application was suspended...they have to present grounds now for it being restored...IE you have failed to comply with the courts previous order's ?

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/eviction/what_happens_at_an_eviction_possession_hearing

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no orders.

 

The judge was on my side they didn’t turn up the twice. I give him all the info about the full debt background being made up of irresponsibile lending and penalty charges

 

It’s was suspended indefinitely the first time and the judge said the whole thing needed to reviewed post 527

 

Second judge gave a strike out date of Aug 2018. Due to them not providing anything I asked for and the letter I give to the court outlining the old complaint dating back to Welcome and them selling on to alpha and how the balance is made up and that no one could help due to the scheme of arrangement welcome had entered into. Post 691/3/5

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then simply relay all that at the hearing taking all previous paperwork and copies of the strike out.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

First time it was ordered

 

The hearing be ajourned generally with a liberty to restore

 

2nd time

That the hearing be ajourned generally with liberty to restore proving that no such application is issued by 20 Aug 2018 the claim is struck out without further order

 

This company are adding stuff on all the time so it looks like I’m in arrears when a lot of that is stuff they have added on while failing to investigate anything I have put to them since day 1. Re letter post 779

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then inform the court they are in breach of the above as they have made a further application without any further investigation or clarification......and that the arrears are false.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok will do.

 

What about the fact that as dx has started this alpha/Prime are not fca registered and based in Luxembourg

 

acenden are operating for 'their overseas client'

 

Bring it to the courts attention at the hearing...see what they think about jurisdiction

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...