Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome secured loans/charge - sold to Alpha/Prime -repo received - ***Claim Dismissed***


cruzhughes

Recommended Posts

Email to Fos

 

Can you just bulletpoint what we spoke about earlier.

 

And what is is exactly you need from me.

 

I’ve got a few different dates in my paperwork.

 

So due to not receiving any notice of assignment from Welcome or Prime upon transfer I’m not entirely sure but will be able to provide them all.

 

Also there are issues with prime and them providing information that I’ve asked them for regarding this debt.

 

We can go into this later if need be.

 

Response

 

We agreed that the irresponsible lending complaint had already been investigated by this service under our reference , so your complaint about Prime Credit should be about the charges added to your account as a result of their debt collecting activities.

 

Prime Credit were regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority between 24/5/12 and 30/9/15 and I wanted to establish with you whether any of the disputed charges were applied to your account between these dates.

 

Otherwise, the business is regulated in Luxembourg and outside of these dates I would need to provide the contact details for the Luxembourg authorities as the complaint should be investigated by them.

 

Also as the role of Acenden is simply as an agent of Prime Credit and would have no responsibility for the charges, it would not be appropriate to set the complaint up against them.

 

I hope this is of help and I await your reply.

 

Part 20 Counter Claim Example......edit to suit.

 

4.By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Part 20 Claim

 

5. The defendant/Part 20 claimant claims sums paid to the claimant /Part 20 defendant in relation to enforced Payment Protection Insurance /Penalty Charges Incorporated within the sum demanded by the Claimant are sums claimed for their administration fees, late payment charges, letter and telephone fees and like provisions.

 

6.The Defendant was required to purchase the PPI as a condition of the Creditor entering into the Agreement: on or around January 2008. The said premium for the PPI was an item entering into the total charge for credit as determined in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Total Charge for Credit) Regulations 1980, and was therefore, by reason of Section 9(4) of the Act, not to be treated as part of the credit even though time was to be allowed to its payment.

 

And the defendant/Part 20 claimant claims:-

 

i) £ xxxxxxxx Payment Protection Insurance

 

ii) £ xxxxxxx uUnfair charges/Interest (expand on reasoning)

 

iii) Interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum until judgment or further order or such other sum as the court thinks fit.

 

Thank you.

 

Do I add their penalty fees in as if I do I takes me over the 10 grand bracket?

 

Hearing is estimated for an hour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yes and the int on them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish I didnt realise theres a £10k limit on part 20?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish I didnt realise theres a £10k limit on part 20?

 

There isnt a limit...but it gets expensive as you have to pay a fee and it pushes it to Fast Track...so best to to keep it below 10K...PPI plus section 69 Interest only (8%)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why’s it saying underneath my name I record my calls do you?

 

New tweak to the forum

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Counterclaims

What about counterclaims?

If someone wants to counterclaim in a small claim,

they must pay the fee that would be payable as if they started the claim.

 

For example,

if the claimant started a claim for £4,555,

they would have to pay a court fee of £205.

 

If the defendant wanted to raise a counterclaim in response for £6,000,

the defendant would have to pay a court fee of £455, as well.

The court would therefore receive a total of £660 in fees.

 

Sorry just found that and you posted

 

Hot off the FOS

 

I must clarify that Prime Credit are not un-regulated but appear to be regulated by the Financial Authorites in Luxembourg.

 

They are known as the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier and they can be contacted via the following web site.

 

http://www.cssf.lu/en/contact

 

I am sorry that,

on this occasion we are unable to help you further but I wish you well in resolving your issue.

 

Regards

 

What evidence should I submit as exhibits.

 

The 3 that are on my statement are theirs not mine

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I just hand in tomorrow as it is then? Another copy to prime and one to myself?

Why did solictor tell me in court to send it direct to them?

 

No copies of any exhibits that I have namely the settled statement which court and solictor both have since last week.

 

No further work to be done on it?

 

Nothing to be taken out or added in

 

And just sit back and hope it does the job.

 

I have no legal expertise whatsoever and it’s taken 2 years finding out what I have but I’m not even sure if my defence/statement is even right or even how to simplify it.

 

Cos if you got bored then there’s not much hope for me and the judge is there

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets have a look.......working.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m going away to work on the 25th and won’t be back before the courts shut on the 30th.

 

then make sure you have internet access then you can email the court you defence and counter claim for the £8k and costs.

 

is that possible?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It helps to be a nerd…….

 

Legal charge for loan A attached..dated same as recent LR file copy you have.

And the date the one they have referred to in their earlier rider [19-06-06]

 

So we’ve proved the agreement number the charge they are using for the repo [Loan A]

 

Now Prove this relates to Loan D they have produced statements for stating its outstanding and causing the repo sum

 

Loan A was settled 3/4/7 for £6767 by loan B

However there is NO record of this payment in A statements

Neither is there any record in Loan A statements how this was settled. SO NO LINK TO Loan B in the chain to Loan A legal charge

 

Loan B was settled 5/10/7 for £12286.25 by Loan C

Again no record of this payment in Loan B statements

Neither is there any record in Loan C statements how this was settled. SO NO LINK TO Loan C in the chain to Loan A legal charge

 

Loan C was settled 29/8/8 for £27971.82 by loan D

 

The claimant has produced Loan D statements with their WS – prove this payment – prove the chain!!

There is no chain…..

 

So: you produce to the court and the claimant the attached copy of the Loan A legal charge

Put the claimant to strict proof as to how this relates to the account Loan D…simples

 

the matter of assignment needs address

i'll do that soon

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring the court get the email AD to use

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their witness statement to the court a few days before the last hearing

email me the exhibits please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read what I posted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

makes sure I have everything please

I appreciate I might have them but ...

 

each repo case paperwork

every thing from them

everything from you

 

that was used in each hearing..

 

label each file

repo 1 claimant paperwork

repo 1 defendant paperwork

 

etc etc

 

I don't need stuff you didn't use

i'e ONLY what YOU sent to the court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't sweat on it too much I must have it all here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes let it run for now got a busy 24hrs

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...