Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Renault kango van issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of advice needed, I bought a van via eBay for about 3.5k described as nice driver from a private seller

Picked up Monday and when put under load stop light flicks up and goes off

I did test drive before buying but this was round the block

Today on the motorway the engine management light comes on with a fault relating to the fuel system

I messaged the seller about it yesterday , he said it had been standing for a month so might be that

Do I have any recourse , from what I can see if it's described as a good drive this is mis representation ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, are you sure that is a private seller? If you check his feedback and find that he sells more than he buys – and in particular if his other items have been vehicle related, then you have a good basis for saying that he is a trader – maybe posing as a private seller.

 

Anyway, even if he is a private seller, I still think that you are entitled for £3500 to have a van in reasonable condition. Why don't you post the link to the auction and we can have look.

 

You know where he lives et cetera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that there is very little doubt that he is a dealer. He selling a variety of different car parts relating to different models. There are one or two cars as well. There is variety of clothing – different sizes clearly fitting a number of different people. He may not be a car dealer but he certainly an eBay dealer and he may be posing as a private seller. I wonder if he pays tax on his income?

 

I would suggest that you take screenshots of all his feedback and also of the items that he presently has the sale. How far as he away from you?

 

Of course, it is quite likely that he will deny being an eBay dealer, but that may as well be the basis of your position.

 

On that basis you are protected by the consumer rights act in this means that you have a 30 day short-term right to reject. If you want to reject the vehicle then you should give him notice in writing immediately – sent registered post, rather than recorded that the vehicle is defective and that you are exercising your short-term right to reject and that you want to organise a full refund.

 

On the other hand, if you want to hang onto the vehicle that you simply want him to pay for the repairs, then I would still serve him with the 30 day notice to preserve your position but I would go on to get a diagnosis and a quotation for putting the car into good order.

 

How long has he owned the vehicle? You should be to tell from the paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that there is very little doubt that he is a dealer

.

 

 

There is absolutely no evidence on his e bay record that he is a car dealer or e bay dealer come to that. It all looks perfectly reasonable to me. He buys far more than he sells.

 

 

A retired Detective Chief Inspector once told me "just because you see a man in a pub throw an empty packet of cigarettes on the fire does not mean he smokes".

 

 

Think about it!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a private buyer and private seller unfortunately it's a case of caveat emptor, buyer beware which basically means no recourse unless grossly mis advertised.

 

 

However it might not be as bad as it seems. You need to describe the warning light that flashes on under acceleration. There could be multiple reasons for this such as low brake fluid which will flash under these circumstances, if the car is euro 6 emissions, the ad blue light, if been standing and a diesel it might need a DPF regeneration ( very fast run up a motorway)

 

 

Other aspects for the fuel light can be just a blocked fuel filter or the water in fuel indicator if fitted. Blocked fuel filters have been an issue across all manufacturers for the last few years especially if the car has stood for a while.

 

 

I think you need to either describe exactly what lights flash up and when and take it to someone who can read the DTC codes that are registered when this happens.

 

 

Until you do this it's very much a case of much ado about nothing but as usual some members think they are experts in this field who actually know nothing and are far too quick to jump to conclusions which leads to mis interpretation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ve read the codes and they relate to the fuel system, specifically small leak fuel system , might be an injector .

It had been serviced recently with a new fuel filter fitted.

The ad states a great drive , with these faults coming up its not

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that there is very little doubt that he is a dealer. .

 

There is absolutely no evidence on his e bay record that he is a car dealer or e bay dealer come to that. It all looks perfectly reasonable to me. He buys far more than he sells.

 

 

A retired Detective Chief Inspector once told me "just because you see a man in a pub throw an empty packet of cigarettes on the fire does not mean he smokes".

 

 

Think about it!!!

 

Sorry, I have to side with Bankfodder here. There are far too many parts to have either been given them or just happen to be in his shed. You don't just happen to have:

 

JOBLOT BULK WHOLESALE GENUINE OE FORD POLLEN FILTERS NEW x19 FOCUS C-MAX MONDEO (#251528531058)

JOBLOT BULK WHOLESALE GENUINE OE FORD POLLEN FILTERS NEW x29 FOCUS C-MAX MONDEO (#251528526130)

JOB LOT 9 GENUINE FORD CABIN POLLEN FILTERS FOCUS MONDEO GALAXY FIESTA SMAX CMAX (#251453336289)

 

Just lying around in the attic. And there are many many sales of this nature. So to me he appears as a business and should be treated as such.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well on my search this doesn't appear but you also have to consider the time line .

 

 

Further, the OP doesn't think he is a dealer.

There is a big difference between a dealer in the motor trade and a dealer on e bay with other items.

 

 

I believe as far as trading standards are concerned a dealer is one who sells in excess of x number of cars

over a period of x number of months irrespective of the medium they are sold through.

 

Further, one would have to prove he is a trader in motor vehicles.

He might well be a trader in other items but the law is very different depending on the item for sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONSUMER CONTRACTS FOR GOODS, DIGITAL CONTENT AND SERVICES.

 

“Trader” means a person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade,

business, craft or profession, whether acting personally or through another

person acting in the trader’s name or on the trader’s behalf."

 

" A trader claiming that an individual was not acting for purposes wholly or

mainly outside the individual’s trade, business, craft or profession must prove

it."

 

This man has too much stuff to sell so he is either buying it in or being given it by the company he

works for to sell for them in the hope he is classed as a private person and not a trader so there is no comeback on them.

 

That brings him into the relms of Trader.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...