Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Angryman1404
      IDRWW letter and email received this week

      By Angryman1404 · Posted

      Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about bb I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? 
    • honeybee13
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By honeybee13 · Posted

      Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • London1971
      Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old Cap1 Debt

      By London1971 · Posted

      Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • theoldrouge
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By theoldrouge · Posted

      So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
    • London1971
      Lowell/Overdales letter of claim now claimform - 2019 paypal EU debt

      By London1971 · Posted

      Done

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

halifax wont remove default.HELP

Thepunisher2006
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thepunisher2006

Thepunisher2006

Posted
Posted

after sending my lba to halifax {credit card side }they came back offering all my charges back all£490 of them but they wont remove my default off the credit agencies or any of the missed payments they have put on there Do i continue with court because there14 days are up and they wont remove default or will i have a problem in court because they have offered my full amount back:rolleyes: SOMEONE PLEASE HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites
gizmo111

gizmo111

Posted
Posted
CHEERS 4 that problem is he lost his case on it after he put in a lot of hard work but i still need to know can i go to court and still try to claim intrest even though they have offerd me my charges:rolleyes:

 

In which case as Jonni says on his thread you must insist that the default is removed before you accept the cheque for charges - not sure how you would word this - but Halifax are bound to be a bit smug on this at present.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thepunisher2006

Thepunisher2006

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i spoke on the phone to halifax when i got the letter that i would accept this money if they would take of the default as well,they declined saying it was my own fault for going over my limit{well i woulndt have gone over if they hadnt put charges on} so i said i would not execpt this and i would continue with court action so what to do now

Link to post
Share on other sites
gizmo111

gizmo111

Posted
Posted
i spoke on the phone to halifax when i got the letter that i would accept this money if they would take of the default as well,they declined saying it was my own fault for going over my limit{well i woulndt have gone over if they hadnt put charges on} so i said i would not execpt this and i would continue with court action so what to do now

 

Don't know - perhaps cross ref on Jonni's thread and see if you get any help that way ?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thepunisher2006

Thepunisher2006

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i am taking halifax to court and they have offered all my bank charges back , but they will not remove my default notice ,should i send the following letter as my responcen :confused:

Dear sirs

 

First I would like to thank you for the letter dated 11/11/1111 offering me all my charges back ,whilst I would have liked to have excepted this , I feel I cannot until you remove my default from the credit agencies files

I will now continue my claim in court, I would like to offer further explanation of my Particulars of Claim, part 5(d) - removal of prejudicial information passed to third parties and in particular, the removal of a default notice posted on my credit report.

 

Under section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1998, a Court has the authority to order the removal of inaccurate data. It is my belief that HBOS PLC entered details of this default solely due to the level of unlawful charges imposed on my bank account

Further, under section 13 of the Data Protection Act, it is possible to claim for compensation for failure to comply with the requirements of section 14. Whilst not part of my existing claim, I shall retain the right of further action under this clause in the future, should I see fit.

 

I will elucidate these points, where necessary, via the Allocation Questionnaire should you wish to proceed with a defence.

 

If you wish to settle this matter without further involvement by the Court, then please respond in writing to the above address stating your acceptance of my claim in full and without additional conditions. If the full amount is paid, by way of personal cheque, and the default notice is removed from my credit files, then I will write to the court and bring my action to an end.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
bearo

bearo

Posted
Posted

You need to be careful here, as you can see from Jonh's case although both defaults and charges went hand in hand the judge refused to entertain the issue of charges as it had been settled previously,

 

It looks like to stand any chance of winning a removal of a default and charges you need to bring both issues to the table at once....therefore do not accept a settlement in the case of charges if you want to deal with the issue of defaults with them too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...