Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Payday Loans about to be statute barred - query over default date (SCOTLAND)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2986 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For information I'm in Scotland.

 

I have two Payday loans with Lending Stream which are about to become statute barred in a few months time.

 

The problem I have is that I've been checking my credit scores

and there is one default registered by LS on my noddle report which is all well and good

and won't fall off until next year which is fine but

 

I checked my Experian account today and discovered two defaults by LS

but the date of the defaults are 2015.

 

I've had no contact with LS since I defaulted in 2011

in fact I heard nothing from them until 2014

and have since then periodically received emails saying my accounts going to be passed to a debt collector

or more recently the correspondence has ramped up with various settlement offers,

 

I suspect this is due to it going statute barred soon.

 

Now my query is what do I do about the default dates?

 

If I contact LS now then that resets the clock on the SB

but if I don't then effectively its going to have a negative impact on my credit rating for another 5 years

meaning I won't stand a chance of getting a mortgage in the next two years as I had planned

 

I've been in default since 2011

so I've no idea where they plucked the 2015 date from

but it's certainly the same loans as the default amount matches up

 

So what do I do?

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these Default markers just made up to date or does it specifically state that the Default Date is 2015 ?

 

 

If you made your last payment in 2011, I am not sure they can simply hold off adding a default marker for nearly 5 years ? I will ask others to look in on you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so Im guessing this is Noddle with the DD of 2011... PDL have been reporting to Callcredit for a long time on these types of loans, however they only recently started to report onto the other 2 CRAs... and in turn they have been getting away with doing this.

The information reported across all 3 CRAs should be consistent.

 

The ICO is realtively clear on defaults. It should ideally be registered between 28 days and 6 months after default. (At extreme 6 months)

IMHO you should either complain direct to LS or raise a dispute with shows the Default Date on the Noddle CRA

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies,

yes the default is registered as having defaulted date of 2015 which is incorrect

and obviously to my detriment.

 

 

I'll try initially raising a dispute with callcredit first and see if they will change the dates,

to be honest I'm shocked at how different the reports from callcredit and noddle are,

some show defaults that the others don't.

All from payday loans.

 

 

I'm trying to get my finances in order at the moment

with the consideration of making complaints about irresponsible lending,

 

 

at the point I had 6 different loans from 6 different companies at the one time

which lead to my financial downfall.

 

 

I am wary of kicking the hornets nest though as I do have outstanding balances

which again are due to become SB soon but

 

 

if there's a chance I could get the defaults removed and at least interest written off

then it might be worth my while.

 

 

Are there chances of having the defaults removed and a possible outstanding balance wiped?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the links,

 

 

I meet several of the criteria for irresponsible lending for pretty much all of my Payday loans.

 

 

Looks like tonight is going to be spent going through bank statements seeing how much I've received,

when and how much I've paid back.

I know it's in the region of Thousands.

 

 

I've been so stupid and it just got out of control,

thank fully I've never touched nor considered another payday loan since 2011.

 

 

Worst mistake I ever made was getting into that cycle it almost caused me to lose my home

 

 

As part of my complaint can I ask that any defaults be removed from my file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...