Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Its based on 10% annual depreciation, divided by 52 weeks and then x the excess number of weeks that they have had the vehicle for, after the agreed initial 3 week repair.
    • LOL LOL LOL Don't need that many to deport a handful of volunteers - at best Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show Cant have hundreds of well paid people in a department deporting a single volunteer when we have an upcoming election to lose now can we - VIPal drenched in riches and departments full of pals well paid for doing nowt will 'sadly soon be history - was rumored to in a text from a soon to be ex-minister texting in from one of his main jobs in a number of industries he will soon be unable to help.   Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show  
    • try it.... use recuva or file scavenger or glary utils
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

carter/lowell claimform - vanquis 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


walpants
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

received a letter from bryan carter a few days ago saying that they intend to continue with the claim shortly but before they do they are prepared to enter into negotiations to avoid cost on both parties.

 

 

I haven't responded to them. im thinking maybe they are just trying their luck and wont actually proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...

No

Nothing of the sort

 

Just STD procedure if you go read other like threads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes to mediation

But of course if carter doesn't find the enforceable paperwork

They'll be nowt to mediate over

 

The rest of the form is self explanatory

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I have just been reading a similar case.

 

if I say yes to the mediation then I still wont know if they have the paper work

and as my defence is that they haven't produced it then the mediation is pointless

as I will only be able to say that the figures they say I owe are not confirmed.

 

 

im not going to agree to pay a figure that I don't know is what I should owe them.

 

how likely is it that it will get sent to a paper hearing?

 

 

I could cope with that if it got that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then mediation wont proceed...but at least you agreed to participate.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No requirement to sign

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi, just an update on this

 

 

I sent the directions questionnaire to both parties and agreed to mediation.

I put a cover letter in the one to the court just saying that I had requested documents from them and had not received them.

 

I then received 3 letters from the court all exactly the same with an appointment for mediation

and asking me to email or call them as they didn't hold a phone number for me

(even though I had filled it in on the questionnaire)

the appointment they sent was not suitable as it was whilst I was at work

so I emailed them to tell them that and give them my number.

 

I then had a voice mail from them saying to call them back about my appointment, which I have done today,

 

 

I explained why I was ringing and the guy said let me have a look,

he then said

'I can see we have sent a letter out regarding mediation - did you read the letter in full?'

I said yes

 

 

he said

'do you have any questions about the letter?'

I said yes and I told him that I had requested information about the debt and that I haven't received it,

he then said

'your case is not suitable for mediation and the case will now be referred back to the court.'

I said ok and that was that.

 

now I am just hoping and praying that they don't continue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite usual for farter

 

9/10 he will now disc the claim.

 

they issue 1000's of speculative claims a week

hoping for a non contested default rubberstamped judgement.

 

you found CAG!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have received a court date 8th jan 2016. the fee needed to be paid by 4th dec

and I must deliver copies of all documents relied upon by 14 days prior to the court date. which will be chrismas day!

 

I haven't heard anything from the court since this letter so am I to assume that it is going ahead

and the fee has been paid? im thinking its been 10 days they would of let me know if it hadn't been paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so I have received a court date 8th jan 2016. the fee needed to be paid by 4th dec and I must deliver copies of all documents relied upon by 14 days prior to the court date. which will be chrismas day! Dont forget your witness statement is also part of your documents..Christmas Day is a holiday for courts so they will be due 26th Dec

 

 

I haven't heard anything from the court since this letter so am I to assume that it is going ahead and the fee has been paid? im thinking its been 10 days they would of let me know if it hadn't been paid?

 

Still not 100% proceeding, even if they have paid the hearing fee...hearing fees are refundable if enough notice is provided.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what with no paperwork provided by the clamant

 

 

you are having a laugh aren't you?

 

 

nothing to be scared about anyway/

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not having a laugh, I asked if the claimant had paid the fee and she said yes.

 

I don't even know what documents I need to send to the court

I don't have anything other than my original defence that I submitted.

 

 

I really cant afford to pay out nearly £1000 just before xmas

but I don't think I deal with the stress of having to go to court either,

I had hoped it wouldn't go this far.

 

also the only thing I have in my defence is that they haven't sent me the original credit agreement

but Im not confident enough about the law around it to be able to argue my case.

 

if they were to turn around and say we don't need it

I couldn't question it when I don't really understand it.

 

 

I think I might be in over my head!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they'll go nowhere near a court with no paperwork .

 

 

hold your nerve

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so say I stick it out,

 

what should my next move be?

 

do I leave it to the last min to send what ever it is I have to send

or do I do it straight away in the hope that they see it as im not backing down?

 

also can you point me I the right direction to figure out what I need to send them?

 

also could it be possible that they don't need the paper work as that is what they stated in a letter they sent me when I asked for it?

 

thank you for your help by the way it is very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Invariably a defendant has very little to to disclose....thats mainly down to the claimant...but you could disclose your CPR 31.14/CCA requests and any responses...any document referred to within your defence or witness statement (which is part of your disclosure) that you intend to rely on and use as evidence.

 

Dont be in a hurry to send it to swiftly..I normally advocate waiting for the claimants witness statement and disclosures first...but as this is BC then you may be waiting a while.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so I assume they have to send their stuff to me as well as the court the same as I do them and the court. so if i wait till maybe 23rd dec to send mine, if I don't receive theirs over xmas then chances are that means they have pulled out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...