Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2nd class stamp only , get free proof of posting from any PO counter dx  
    • Hi,  It has been a long time but I have had confirmation claim will proceed to hearing in roughly 1 months time.  I was wondering if anyone could advise on defence please.  A few questions I have are: 1) I didn't notify VCS that I was not the driver of the vehicle and the judge may look negatively on this point.  I did not receive any direction in correspondence from VCS  that I should inform them if I was not the driver and that was going to be the foundation for may argument on this point. 2) The vehicle is stopped at a zebra crossing.  Based on the images from VCS for around 10 seconds.  At that time there is someone standing near the zebra crossing and someone else enters my vehicle.  I was going to raise the point that stopping at a zebra crossing when someone is standing near it is to be expected.  I was also going to ask the question how you can have a no stopping zone when there are zebra crossings where the driver is required to stop. 3) The no stopping zone is clearly signposted, however, no drop off or pickup is not clearly signposted with one small sign at the zebra crossing, parallel to the road and on the passengers side.  I was going to challenge that no-drop off or pickup is clearly signposted.  4) VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet.  It covered 1) Claimant not being in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.  2) No evidence that claimant's contract with landowner supersedes byelaws & signage isn't legally binding contract. 3) No contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on speculative charge. I am interested to know if anyone has had success or been unsuccessful with this 'generic' defence. 5) If I should submit an updated defence to the court based on questions 1, 2 & 3.  Or if it is better to only raise these points in court? Thanks.  Any guidance would be appreciated  
    • I honestly don't know, Baz. In addition what I don't  understand (from that pamphlet) is this: The s88 criteria are quite clear and don't need a medical professional to interpret them . The one most relevant to his topic says that an application is not a "qualifying application" if a relevant disability has been declared. The problem with the word "may" is how does the applicant establish whether me "may" driver under s88 when he has not complied with its conditions? I don't know the answer to that either. But to further muddy the waters, the pamphlet says this (about : But the s88 statute says absolutely nothing like that at all. It simply says that if you have declared a relevant disability s88 does not apply. The DVLA pamphlet is simply confusing as far as I can see. That's actually my opinion and that's what I would stick to if it was me making the application. But I'll seek a few opinions from others over the next couple of days.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

paid for an item and it never arrived


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I recently paid for an item from gumtree by bank transfer and it never arrived. I know the oldest [problem] and I fell for it and I have now lost £577.

We were both barclay account holders I have been in touch with the bank and they did an investigation there is no money in the account and the bank have closed it down.Is it worth me pursing this case by asking the bank, mobile phone company and gumtree to disclose any details they have on this person so I could possibly pursue my money through a court. They have all shouted data protection when asked about details but is it worth going down the Norwich Pharmacal Route or could I get the information under the freedom of information act.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As bad as this sounds, I think you will be stymied quite quickly.

 

1 People are still able to open fraudulent accounts with the banks.

2 Gumtree don't check the details placed. Once they are informed of a phoney post, they will delete the post and probably the account

3 PAYG mobile phones don't need personal details to use.

 

Hindsight is a wonderful thing. All I can suggest is that you never do a bank transfer again as bank transfers are as good as real cash.

 

The bank will not help as you willingly paid although they may instigate an investigation into the other account.

 

Freedom of Information only applies to official bodies. Councils, Government, police etc.

Even if you sent your bank a SAR they would only disclose your info.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So even thou I have got an sort code, account number, mobile number is it going to be a waste of time and money chasing my £577 up. I thought that if I could get the bank to disclose an address for the account and the ee mobile company to disclose any numbers made from this mobile and where it was topped up etc it may of helped me nail this crook. And any information gumtree may hold as well surely the paper trail could lead somewhere

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could apply to the courts for and order but is this just throwing good money after bad?

 

If someone sets up a dud account, they could just as easily use a fake address. If this 'person' is a regular con man, they are likely to be able to cover their tracks.

 

I'm not trying to put you off, just highlight the possible scenarios.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So even thou I have got an sort code, account number, mobile number is it going to be a waste of time and money chasing my £577 up. I thought that if I could get the bank to disclose an address for the account and the ee mobile company to disclose any numbers made from this mobile and where it was topped up etc it may of helped me nail this crook. And any information gumtree may hold as well surely the paper trail could lead somewhere

 

Which is the job of the police. Pass the details to the police (if need be via ActionFraud).

 

If you found more details, what would you do to 'nail them'? If the answer is "pass the info to the police", then let the police get the info (they'll face less resistance to getting it than you). If the answer is "take the law into my own hands" : I'm not sure CAG would support that, so the answer is still : leave it to the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This as already been reported to action fraud but as there are so many on going cases I do feel this will be pushed under the carpet. I thought it was possible to represent yourself in a court of law. And I have read the data protection does not cover persons in illegal activities and therefore information should be made available to take a case to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This as already been reported to action fraud but as there are so many on going cases I do feel this will be pushed under the carpet. I thought it was possible to represent yourself in a court of law. And I have read the data protection does not cover persons in illegal activities and therefore information should be made available to take a case to court.

 

You certainly can represent yourself in court.

If you can find the perpetrator, you can use civil law to recover your losses (if you can get a judgement AND enforce it).

 

As for data protection: data protection can't be used to prevent transfer of information regarding illegal activities.

Expect this to translate to "we'll give the information freely to the police who investigate illegality, or we'll give it to you if you get a court order".

Just because they can't say "we'll never give you the information due to data protection" doesn't mean they have to give it to you just because you ask - you may still have to force their hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...