Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all I had a vist from a swift bailiff for a unpaid tv license fine 2 days ago who said he had a looksmith on the way. I did not let him into my home as I came home from work and he was sat in his van outside my house and he told me I had 1 hour to find the full payment of 650 pounds witch I just cannot afford

 

I made him a offer of 100-150 pounds a month witch in no way was he going to accept and kept threating me with removal of goods from my home within the hour until I saw the letter he put through my door before I got home witch stated I had 24hrs to pay he was not happy when I pulled him up on this so he left saying he would return in 24hrs if I had not contacted him with the full payment then he left.

 

I then phoned swift to try an sort something out with them but was told by the first person I spoke to too explain my circumstances and he should be able to help me. so I rang him back and tried again but he just kept saying I would not be getting a payment plan and I had to pay in full amount by the time my 24hrs were up.

 

so I rang swift back and ask to speak to a higher person in charge. when she came to the phone her first words were hello I can only give u the same advice my colleuges gave you to witch I replied so u will listen to me but not help me to witch she replied correct so I hung up the phone. so I rang him back up the next morning to inform him that they was no way I could pay fine and explain I have 4 children and a disabled partner and that id spoke to varous people regarding this matter such as citizens advice the courts and his own company with all more or less saying he could help me out if he wanted to it is in his hands.

 

he replied by saying I thought u was a genuine person and thought I was going to pay and that I just said I was going to try to sort out to get him from my home and then ring him and say I was not going to pay. this made my slightly angry as ive tried my best to come to a solution even saying why would I ring u to say I cant pay if I was not trying to sort out to wich he replied listen I don't care what citizens advice the courts or any body has to say you will pay the full amount or ill be back next week to remove goods.

 

so I told him u are supposed to come back today when then 24hrs are up not anytime he feels like it I just want this sorted. he said no ill come when I want to.

 

ive been told by varous debt advisors not to let him in and get it reffered back to court but I no he can just get a locksmith and just enter my property witch ive been told nine times out of ten they wont do because they have to pay a locksmith there and then out of there pocket.

 

i just dont no where i go from here im making offers but just wont aceppet any of them

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

If enforcement agents (new name for bailiffs) refuse an offer related to a Magistrates fine and you cannot afford it, you should be able to attend the Magistrates for a means hearing. You would need to take with you full details of your financial circumstances e.g payslips or benefit income, plus up to date bank account statement.

 

Phone the Magistrates first thing Monday to arrange the means hearing and get it sorted with them. Explain that Swift are refusing the offer of payments made to their agent and threatening to break into your home. Speak to the courts manager if you need to.

 

Swift are acting for the courts, so if Swift are not helping you come to a payment arrangement, then the courts should be willing to listen to you.

 

Nb. For a criminal fine, enforcement agents can break into a property, but not if no one is at home.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you put your offer in writing? Dealing with a bailiff over the phone is a waste of time you need to put everything in writing. Along with your offer to payment proposals you will need to provide them with an income and expenditure sheet and proof to their being a disabled person within the household.

It would also be a good idea to show you are genuine with your offer and enclose a payment to what can be seen to be affordable and sustainable.

 

On the above point do not be tempted to offer what you cannot comfortably afford to keep on paying on a set date, for if you then miss or make a late payment they will take that to be a default and you will be back to square one.

 

Always keep a papertrail and record all calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you wonkeydonkey ive written letters this morning to the courts and swift witch I will post first thing Monday morning. I also will start recording phone calls . am my in my rights to record him if him comes back and the conversations we have in person

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you wonkeydonkey ive written letters this morning to the courts and swift witch I will post first thing Monday morning. I also will start recording phone calls . am my in my rights to record him if him comes back and the conversations we have in person

 

You are indeed permitted to record his visit, also check to see if he is wearing a body cam that records the visit then you can. if needs be, ask for a copy of the said 'recording'. As an added precaution I would keep back printed copies of your letters and pass them to him from a window or through the letterbox with the recorded telling you are not refusing to pay the debt but merely await a reply to their acceptance of your payment plan.

 

He will undoubtedly tell you he has a locksmith on the way but should he wish to attempt forced entry while the matter is seeking a resolve, then film everything and contact the court and your MP without delay.

 

PS send your letters by email initially and then post the hard copies on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you know about the original fine? If so did you attend Court or if not did you fill in a form about your means?

 

Before Swifts attended did you receive a Further Steps Notice from the Court asking you to bring your account up to date? Have you moved since the original offence & if so did you advise the Court?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Locksmiths are only used on people who refuse to cooperate or ignore the bailiffs.

 

As you've made several calls to the Swift office offering a suitable payment plan, the bailiff won't get authorisation to use this power. As you've seen already, it's an empty threat on this occassion.

 

I don't think I've ever seen a single instance of Swift removing anything, never mind forcing entry to a property.

 

There's nothing to stop you paying them online if the bailiff continues to be awkward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If enforcement agents (new name for bailiffs) refuse an offer related to a Magistrates fine and you cannot afford it, you should be able to attend the Magistrates for a means hearing. You would need to take with you full details of your financial circumstances e.g payslips or benefit income, plus up to date bank account statement.

 

There is a great deal of confusion about a 'Means Hearing' and when...and if such a hearing can be made.

 

With TV Licensing for example; a visit would first have been made and the TV Enquiry Agent (employed by Capita) would have asked the debtor a series of questions to ascertain whether the debtor is working or unemployed and what benefits (if any) they receive.

 

The debtor will then receive a summons from the court and there will be a section on the form with tick boxes for the debtor to either plead guilty or not guilty. If guilty, the form notifies the debtor that they need to return the form back to the court and that must include with it....the MC100 Means Enquiry Form.

 

If a 'guilty' plea is entered there is no need to attend court.

 

At the hearing, the magistrate will set the 'level' of fine and this will be reduced if a 'guilty' plea has been made. Next, the magistrate will determine the 'amount' of the fine. This will be done by reference to the TV Enquiry Agent's statement AND the information provided by the debtor onthe Means Enquiry Form (MC100).

 

If the debtor fails to return the summons and the completed Means Enquiry Form then the court can set the fine on it's own inititative. After the court decide the matter, the debtor will be sent a Notice of Fine/Collection Order detailing the amount of fine and date by when payment must be made. If payment is not forthcoming, the court must by law send the debtor a Further Steps Notice. If a debtor is unable to afford to pay the amount ordered then the court are always willing to accept monthly payments.

 

If there is no response to the Further Steps Notice a warrant is issued and passed to an enforcement agent. A further chance is given to pay the debt by monthly installments when the Notice of Enforcement is sent.

 

Regulations do provide for a debtor to apply to the court for a Means Hearing but this is only applicable in cases where the debtors financial circumstances had changed SINCE the day on which the fine had been set by the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...