Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
    • Welcome to posting on CAG cabot, people will be along soon to help you try to sort this out. Please complete this:  
    • Quotes of the day penny mordaunt came out swinging with her broadsword, and promptly decapitated sunak while Nigel Farage, representing Reform UK, made contentious claims about immigration policies, which were swiftly fact-checked during the debate.   Good question though raised at labour about the 2 child benefit cap, which I broadly agree with, but the tory 'trap' assumes tory thinking - rather than child centric thinking. There should be no incentives to have kids as a financial way of life paid for by everyone else ... ... BUT the kids should not be made to suffer for the decisions of their parents Free school meals would feed the kids, improve their ability to learn, and incentivise them to go to school. As an added benefit ... it would invest in our nations future.   How far this should go is a matter for costing, social intent and future path of the nation, but not feeding our nations kids is an abomination. There should be at least one free school meal per day for every child who attends school. Full Stop. Its the cheapest and most effective investment in our future we could make.
    • Hey people, I've been browsing this amazing forum for the past year and recieved a letter today which has made me require some help. Received a claim form from Cabot in the Civil National Business Centre in regards to an Aqua Credit Card taken out in 2018. I failed to make payments due to financial hardship and have not taken out any credit or uses any forms of credit since. Received a lot of letters from Cabot and their solicitors Mortimer Clarke which I've ignored    By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Aqua& the Defendant on or around 26/03/2018 ('ths Agreement) New Day Ltd RE Aqua agreed to issue Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the named Claimant. Cabot Credit Management Group Limited, acting as servicing agent of the named Claimant through its Appointed Representative (Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited), has arranged for these proceedings to be issued in the name of the Claimant. The named Claimant may be entitled to claim interest under the Agreement but does not seek such interest and instead claims interest under Section 69(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% p.a.from03/03/2023 until date of issue only, or alternatively such interest as the Court thinks fit THE NAMED CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 3800.82 2. INTEREST OF 379.84 3. Costs How would I go about this and what could happen? I don't remember much details about the card either.
    • cause like you said in post one, 99% of people think these are FINES (it now reads charge). and wet themselves and cough up. they are not, they are speculative invoices because the driver supposedly broke some imaginary contract by driving onto privately owned land which said owner may or may not have signed some 99% fake contract with a private parking co years ago, thats already expired or has not been renewed or annually paid to employ them dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Appeal Declined


rapt0r
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of background story first,

I have had back problems going back to 2005 when I slipped 2 discs in a industrial injury at work. I have since been on ESA(before it was called ESA) then JSA and then back to ESA in Jan 2014.

 

On Wednesday this week I attended my appeal tribunal hearing for my ESA claim I made back in January 2014. I didn't see the DWP appointed 'doctor' until November 2014 and after getting the decision, zero points awarded, I appealed the decision as I believed it was wrong. Since seeing the DWP 'doctor' in November my condition has worsened to the point that I can now barely walk and am in severe pain constantly in lower back and left leg sciatica. None of that matters though as it is how my condition was in November that counts so I could have been carried into the tribunal in a coffin and it would still have seen the same outcome.

 

I would like to know if the information given to me by my appeal representative is correct and if there's any other options. I have been advised that I should:-

1. Commit fraud and apply for JSA stating that I'm fit for work and hopefully ride it out until May when I can put a new ESA claim in due to the 6 months rule.

2. Go to my doctor and make some other unrelated illness/ailment up that would stop me from working, my adviser said I should say to my Doctor I'm depressed due to this whole process!, and then start a new ESA claim using depression as the reason.

3. Do nothing and starve.

4. Something else I don't know about or been made aware of.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nystagmite,

Where would I go to then to re-apply? Same place as I would as if starting a new ESA claim online?

As for your second sentence, I don't want to think about that yet, just want to get the ball rolling to minimise the gap in benefit payments and the stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The nightmare continues...

 

After speaking today with the ESA department it seems that because I told them that my condition had worsened after my tribunal hearing in February I can not continue to claim ESA as that claim has been closed.

 

My condition got worse in January which was inbetween the period of making the appeal (November) and my appeal hearing in February, so am I screwed for not telling them in January? I have requested a call-back from the ESA dept. in the morning and really need to know if I have a case or not, I was not told by my appointed advisor in January that I needed to notify the DWP that my condition had worsened and (obviously) the DWP wernt kind enough to let me know to tell them if my condition had worsened whilst awaiting my appeal.

 

3 month migraine this has turned out to be be and lost 11 weeks worth of ESA payements lost.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rapt0r:

 

:-x Although it suits them not to, I wish Jobcentreplus would improve their training. The changes from 30 March are horribly complicated and some of the call handlers seem to be economical with the truth.

 

Declared or not, your worsened condition wouldn't have affected the outcome of your appeal. But after it was dismissed, you were and are entitled to make a new claim if your condition's deteriorated or you've a new condition. But it won't be paid, even at assessment rate, until a decision maker's satisfied there's enough evidence to consider limited capability for work.

 

The correct procedure is to reclaim now with as much evidence as you can muster from wherever you can get it. Whilst it's obvious that medical evidence will be most persuasive, Jobcentreplus have agreed to accept evidence from carers, support workers, etcetera. Oh, and claim on an ESA1 form, it'll save another argument with the call centre. You may receive an ESA83 form asking for further evidence.

 

A fit for work decision is treated as prima facia evidence of eligibility for jobseekers so long as you can demonstrate a reasonable prospect of finding some work you can do. But since 30 March claimants can forget about the six months bit before payment for a repeat claim for an unchanged condition.

 

Here's the guidance that's circulated to decision makers;

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/decision-makers-guide-memos-staff-guide

(You need DMG memo 10/15)

 

Should you be forced to claim jobseekers to secure an income, DMG memo 9/15 may be of interest as well.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nov 2014 decision made it's now May!

 

Dec Jan Feb Mar April May so what date exactly in Nov?

 

New rules do not apply as original decision was before 30th March 2015. The old 6 month rule still does but......

 

Declared or not, your worsened condition wouldn't have affected the outcome of your appeal. But after it was dismissed, you were and are entitled to make a new claim if your condition's deteriorated or you've a new condition. But it won't be paid, even at assessment rate, until a decision maker's satisfied there's enough evidence to consider limited capability for work.

 

This is not correct (sorry a bit harsh it is correct but needs an addendum to what you should have done) ... You should have lodged a new claim as soon as you had evidence of deterioration. Although burred deep in some legislation somewhere you can have multiple ESA claims open at the same time. You can even throw in a new claim immediately after you've submitted the 1st and well before the determination or assessment of the 1st.

 

Antone knows the procedural stuff which is basically it's all treated as one big single claim split into separate parts but to us each application appears as a separate entity.

 

Don't kick your self as it's confusing, not very well publicised and the ESA helpline staff unless you're lucky will not know!

 

Now the question is what is the date on the original decision letter?

 

The next question is how badly do you need money?

 

If you wait for the full 6 months to pass you can submit a new claim and it will be paid immediately.

 

If you submit a claim before that date you will not receive payment until a decision is made! If that decision is still negative then you will not be paid until after Mandatory Reconsideration and your appeal has been accepted by the Tribunal Service.

 

Margaret Antone would there be any mileage in waiting the full 6 months (so they get payment) then asking for the full 3 month backdate due to bad advice by the DWP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Margeret, well after a(nother) sleepless night, guess what, they never phoned me back before 9:30 this morning, or at any time today, as they promised:evil:

I waited until 12ish today before I rang up the new ESA claims line and started a new claim dated from this Monday the 4th as the decision about my last claim, before I made the appeal, was made on the 4th November last year. I hope that is correct as from what I've read it's 6 months from the date that the original decision was made before you can claim again???

 

 

Ongoing story if you wish to read.

After my tribunal on the 18th Feb I was advised by my Appeal Rep to try to claim JSA which I did on the 19th by ringing them up and was obviously told that as I wasn't fit for work I couldn't claim JSA, I then phoned up the ESA on the 25th after visiting this forum and being advised that I could re-claim ESA due to my condition worsening. When making the claim I made it very clear several times to the guy I spoke to that my condition had worsened and he said after a bit of uncertainty that I should make a new claim which we did.

 

I also attended the appointment with my neurosurgeon a few day later on the 28th Feb. Got the diagnosis through the post on the 10th March stating I have Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease and the back pain and sciatica that goes with it.

 

Then on the 16th March I recieved a letter back from the ESA saying 'Following the work capability Assessment medical it has been decided you are fit for work bla bla bla." Migraine ensues...

 

I then on the 21st March wrote a letter and sent it recorded delivey back to the person who had sent me the 1 above, with a copy of the report from the neurosurgeon and another sicknote from my doctor. My letter basically explained my situation that I had been to tribunal and it hadn't gone in my favour and that I had been advised that because my condition had worsened I believed I could carry on claiming ESA.

 

Anyway fast-forward to yesterday, and after 6 weeks Im wondering what the delay is, perhaps they were waiting to hear back from my Doctor? I thought, or if they had even received my letter, which according to Royal Mail tracking and a signature they had on the 27th March. So yesterday when speaking to the chap I told him I had sent a letter to them and I had proof of delivery and a signature of the person who had recieved it but according to them they hadn't got a letter from me and then arranged for someone to call me back today...

 

 

 

So thats where I'm upto and yes I agree the Jobcentre/ESA call-staff you ring up to make a claim with or discuss a current claim with are absolutely clueless, and that's being polite!

 

*just seen your reply Speedfreak as I was typing the above

yes very confusing

yep as soon as I got the evidence back from the neurosurgen was when I wrote the letter they are claiming not to have recieved.

I am OK for now moneywise but it is the annoyance of losing out 11 weeks worth of payments that I really would like if I am entitled to it and not being called back today is even more annoying

Edited by rapt0r
Speedfreaks posting
Link to post
Share on other sites

:speedfreek:

 

Yes I know it's possible to have more than one claim on the go but, as rapt0r didn't submit one at the time, I didn't want to further complicate an already poorly understood bit of legislation. Understand where you're coming from cos as I remember it, you've benefited from the previous legislation that allowed endless looping round the system.

 

Coincidentally I discussed this mess with a friend yesterday. If we've interpreted the amended legislation correctly it affects repeat claims made on or after 30 March 15 for the same condition , whatever the date of a previous negative determination by Jobcentreplus or a tribunal.

 

As rapt0r's now submitted a repeat claim six months after the original determination by a decision maker, guess we may find out whether there was any mileage in waiting.

 

Margaret.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rapt0r:

 

Well you won't have done yourself any harm by getting them to accept a new claim. :-) That's half the battle at the moment. Unfortunately, from my interpretation of the legislation that applies from 30 March 15 (did you read the link in #12?) you won't be treated as having limited capability for work, or paid assessment rate, unless or until a decision maker considers there's a realistic prospect of a different outcome decision this time. In due course you should receive a statement of your claim. Return a copy of it to Jobcentreplus, with copies of the neurosurgeon's letter, and your 'signed for' delivery paperwork. Not quite what speedfreek had in mind but proof that Jobcentreplus received and lost some paperwork should be good cause for backdating the claim if it's paid.

 

Please come back if you've further specific questions cos I'm happy to try and answer them. But I don't want to further clutter this thread with detail that may not be relevant to your situation.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...