Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Phillips Cohen for DLC trying to collect santander debt of deceased husband


Anne Elizabeth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If the money isnt in the estate, and is in dispute, then the debts died with him... to put it bluntly. DCA's know this but since they are so pompous and greedy, they dont care and will STILL chase you for it.

 

 

Thank you.

 

 

My husband did not leave any estate in his personal name.

 

 

Our bank accounts were joint and the house jointly owned - we were not "tenants in common"

so the house passed into my sole name with no need for probate, executors, etc.

 

 

I wonder if they may threaten to put a charge on the house, though?

 

 

However, I would think that they would need to take the "estate" to court to do this

and they haven't proven any legal rights to demand money, as far as I can see.

 

 

Although I know that they are just "chancers", shall we say, they do cause distress and

 

 

I intend to see them off - with the help of you wonderful people on this site!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't enter into any letter tennis with them.

 

 

theres nowt they can do to you nor any assets left.

 

 

you need to go read up about Philip cohen, this is there line of work.

 

 

they rarely get anything.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

 

I was just thinking earlier that this is almost Dickensian!

 

 

"widow hounded by late husband's debt collectors!".

 

 

It seems we haven't changed much since the 19th century!

 

 

In fact, I've had so much upset with my husband's death and the deaths of my parents not too long ago,

that this has now made me very angry!

 

 

I've decided that I'm not going to be harassed and upset, grrr!

 

 

I'll keep you all informed on developments.

 

 

Thank you all again xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello everyone. Just an update.

 

 

I have this morning received a second letter from Phillips Cohen, addressed to the executor of my late husband.

 

 

They say that they understand that there are many time constraints and pressures on those dealing with the final affairs of a deceased loved one

and that their intention is not to cause any additional anxiety or distress!

They say their clients, DLC, are entitled to look to the estate for payment of the debt.

 

 

As they have received no communication from me, they are asking me to telephone them, to discuss the estate as soon as possible.

Of course, I won't be doing that!

 

I wonder if it is now the time to write, as Scarlet Pimpernel advised.

 

 

My only problem is that I don't want to really enter into any correspondence with them over a period of time.

 

 

However, if I write what Scarlet Pimpernel advises, hopefully, they will cease contact.

 

 

I just wondered what your thoughts are on this.

 

 

Thanks for you help.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

having seen this several times

 

 

pers I would not

stay silent.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah that reads wrong.

 

 

I mean do not respond

 

 

keep silent.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thank you, dx. I'll leave it for now then.

 

 

I do think they'll persist though.

 

 

I'll keep you all informed of what happens.

 

 

I'll probably write if I hear from them again but I don't want to start a paper trail with them, or it could go on for ever!

 

 

However, if I make it clear, as Scarlet Pimpernel advises, that there will be no further communication,

hopefully, that will be the end of the matter.

At least it's costing them money with every letter they write!

 

Just a thought - they say their clients are entitled to look into the estate! What a nerve!

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting... I have just read tons of stuff on PC and them chasing dead peoples debts...

Out of interest and sorry to be a pain, what is left of the estate?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband had no personal estate.

 

 

Everything was in joint names,

so the bank accounts were simply transferred into my sole name, as was the house, which was previously in joint names.

 

 

So really, he left no estate.

 

 

I did not need to apply for probate or letters of administration.

 

 

His only "personal" possessions were obviously his clothes and a car on the mobility scheme, which has been returned.

 

 

I've just been reading PC's website - they say they have a relationship with the Samaritans!

 

Thank you for your interest and help.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats okay :) #Always glad to help. I agree with DX and I dont. I agree fully with SP that maybe writing and telling htem there is no estate left is the best thing to do, but its your call.

I think the end option is trying to prevent any further issues appearing down the line :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm beginning to think to write and get rid of them may be the best option, even though I don't think they've any right to any information from me! I think that I shall write, very briefly and to the point, also making it clear that it will be the end of the matter and no further correspondence will be entered into. If they continue to pester me after that, I imagine that I should be able to make a formal complaint against them to someone?

 

Many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohhhhhhhhh Yes...

Complain to them, then refer it to the FOS

 

IMO, the FOS would side with you on this... Also the FCA would be a good idea...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cohen's don't give a flying fig.

they write even more

 

 

never seen one letter from them where they say sorry

apologies and go away.

 

 

their letters are a well prepared script from years of clever spoofing

 

 

wonder where the money goes if they do manage to spoof people into paying...urm...........

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I wonder where the money does go? Unfortunately for them, there's nothing for them here! I don't think there's much they can really do, in the circumstances! They must realise that it's statute barred in any case, so as you say, they're just trying a con. Will let you know what happens. Thanks again.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. An update. I've just had a telephone call from Phillips and Cohen! I have to say that he was polite though.

 

They wanted to speak to my late husband's personal representative but I refused to give any names. He said they'd sent two letters, I said, "Yes, they're in the bin." he was quite persistent, saying that he needed to talk to someone with regard to the estate. I told him this information was personal and in any case, there was no estate. He kept saying that he needed to speak to a representative. I told him that I would not discuss this with him at all. He then said that there were one or two questions to be answered and then there would be closure and first could he go through some security questions, which I refused to do, saying I had no idea who he was and in any case, I was saying that this conversation was closure and would complain to the relevant authorities if any further contact was made.

 

I would not have answered the telephone but it was a Manchester number and we do have relatives there.

 

I wonder if this will be the end of the matter, or they will persist? I'll keep you informed.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not have answered the telephone but it was a Manchester number and we do have relatives there.

 

DCA's etc. are well known for this activity, they have a bank of national dialling codes to use to pass off as either a local number or if they have information an area code where you are familiar with receiving calls from, this as you now know is to deceive you into thinking that it is a call from a local number.

 

If you have the facility on your telephone (i.e. BT8500) then place the call into your block list.

 

Stigman

Edited by Stigman
missed a tad of stuff - does happen, one day will be happily single with no kids :)

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

harassment if they do

 

 

if they had any legal right to anything

 

 

they would not be trying to con people on the phone.

 

 

all he wanted to do was to make sure he was threatening the correct person.

 

 

they state all kinds of crap on the phone

that they would never put in a letter as they know they'd get carpeted.

 

 

dunno where it was

but a long time ago there was a post/thread

 

 

they told an exec of an estate that because they had put up a garden shed

to clear their dead relative belongings into

on property listed on the deeds

 

 

they were automatically now liable for the relatives debts!!

 

 

total baloney!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx.

 

 

It also crossed my mind after I'd spoken to him that if the original lenders knew they had a legal case a

nd were likely to win then they would have started court action some time ago.

 

 

It was very much a coincidence, as I was going to write today to tell them there's no estate, will, etc., and to not contact us again.

 

 

I would not give him my name and made it clear not to contact me again.

 

 

I think he was trying to establish identity, as I told him, he has no right to that information, or to make contact.

 

We shall see what they do next.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, superbly handled, as you say with any luck they will now realise that they're going to get nowhere with this and leave well alone, however, should they persist, complain away to the relevant bodies who claim to police this industry.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello everyone. Yes, just an update, sorry, I meant to get back to you.

 

 

I have had no further contact from Philips Cohen since they rang me up.

 

 

I have been waiting to see if they contact me again

 

 

- so far nothing!

 

 

No doubt, thanks to all of your good advice!

 

I shall keep you informed.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...