Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Forgot to add, got friends in Italy, and one of them rang the Police where the fine came from, and her reply was “Tell your friend it’s not a big deal, it’s only a speeding fine we’re not going to chase him, tell him in future to take his foot off the gas, however it he returns to a Italy and gets control checked, he would be held until the fine is paid”  A bit odd I thought, considering I am being chased now.
    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs beared to you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) basically saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Does a creditor have any rights/access to a Life Insurance once they have Judgment


Toots111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh, thank you HB!

 

Do you mean so that you can then post the docs on here, or do you mean that you will be able to peruse them and offer your own advice please?

 

I hope to be able to borrow a scanner by Monday or Tuesday.

 

Hi. Have a go to see if you can upload images onto the site, but if that fails you can email them to me, then they can go on your thread.

 

It's not something I advise on, I'm just trying to help you get the information to the legal guys. :) I'll send you a PM.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

toots

 

 

follow this

 

 

you can use a camera yes.

 

 

HOW TO UPLOAD DOCUMENTS / IMAGES ON CAGi

IMMEDIATELY YOU DO NOT NEED 10 POSTS

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG

YOU MUST ensure that you REMOVE all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc

.

ENSURE: To leave all Monetary Figures and Dates.

.

DO NOT USE A BIRO, PEN, SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS TO EDIT THE INFORMATION

.

1. SCAN YOUR DOCUMENT

.

- Set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300 DPI (150 will do)

- Scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture (jpg) file

- Don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

.

- If you have multiple scans/pictures please put these into a WORD DOC first ensuring you have removed all Personal Information before converting to PDF.

.

- IPHONE ONLY: Take a picture and Convert to PDF via an APP

.

2. HOW TO EDIT (Remove Personal Information)

.

- Do this using MSPAINT.EXE or any Photo Editing program and ensure to save the document.

.

3. HOW TO CONVERT YOUR DOCUMENT TO PDF

.

- If you have OFFICE installed this has an installable PRINT to PDF option so use this and save as PDF.

- If you have PDF as an installed driver use this program and save as PDF.

.

OR Go to one of the many free online pdf converter websites:

.

- http://freejpgtopdf.com/

- http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

- http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

- http://www.pdfmerge.com/

- http://www.primopdf.com/

.

PLEASE REMEMBER: It would be better to upload a Multi-page PDF rather than multiple Single PDFs.

.

4. BEFORE UPLOADING YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- Logically Name your PDF File so Users know what it is. DO NOT NAME YOUR FILE USING BANK NAMES OR CAG IN THE TITLE

.

- For Example: Default Notice DDicon-MM-YYYY.

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG please ensure that you do a final check that all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc. are REMOVED before carrying out the NEXT STEP

.

5. HOW TO UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- In your Thread/Post open a new msg box here.

- Click 'Go Advanced' below the msg box.

- Click 'Manage Attachments' below that box.

- Click the 'Add Files' button on the top right.

- Click 'Select Files', navigate to your file(s) on your PC.

- Click 'Upload Files'.

.

- You DON’T have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box just upload it ……… JOB DONE

- You can click on your links to check them too!!

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want toots

 

 

take the photos and send them to me via an email address

 

 

do you want one?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I've finally managed, although I have no idea how.

 

Hoping now that Sadie and steampowered can have a good luck at these docs

and let me know whether it's the right type of trust to fully protect the policy;

ie, it won't form part of my estate/go through probate when I die,

nobody else can ever gain access to the policy or proceeds other than the named beneficiaries??

 

I am totally bamboozled by the docs;

 

 

I can find the words 'bare', 'revocable', 'irrevocable' etc scattered throughout out them, so I have no idea exactly what type of policy it is??

 

I'll be extremely grateful if somebody can let me know whether I'm okay with this trust.

 

Many thanks,

 

Toots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want toots

 

 

take the photos and send them to me via an email address

 

 

do you want one?

 

 

dx

Hi dx,

 

Many thanks for your posts, which have finally helped me to get the docs onto here, (I hope).

 

I think it was just good luck, rather than knowing what I was doing, but your kind help has got me there in the end!!

 

Hoping that somebody will get back to me regarding the trust I've got.

 

Cheers,

 

Toots

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, under a revocable trust you are the 'trustee' and can revoke the policy up until your death. Since the policy can be revoked it is in theory available to creditors up until your death (but not afterwards). On the other hand, an irrevocable trust permanently passes ownership to the beneficiaries and hence is not available to creditors.

 

However, as I understand it, a revocable trust is still quite difficult for creditors to access. I am not an expert but imagine they would either need a court order, or would need to make you bankrupt (so that your affairs pass to the Official Receiver) to have the policy revoked. In practice I think it would be difficult or impossible for the creditors to actually find out about the policy.

 

So, you'd be better off with an irrevocable trust and it is worth changing if you can, but in reality probably still OK with the current arrangement.

 

Feel free to have a go at posting a scan of the revocable trust documents (with personal details covered up) if you want input on that ... it might be possible to do an amendment.

 

Hi again,

 

I think I've just managed to post the trust docs on here, so whenever you have time, please can you have alook at them and give me your advice??

 

Many thanks steampowered,

 

Toots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bare trust is one where the person who benefits from it (referred to as the beneficiary) has an immediate and absolute right to the assets that are transferred to the trust and any income generated by them.

 

The assets transferred into a bare trust are known as “trust property” or the “trust fund”. The trust fund is held in the name of the trustee, who may (but doesn’t have to) be the person who sets the bare trust up. Usually, there are two trustees involved; often the person setting up the trust and one other.

 

A person setting up a bare trust can be certain that the assets they set aside for the beneficiary will go to that person because once the trust has been created, the beneficiary cannot be changed.

 

As the beneficiary has an immediate and absolute right to the trust fund, the trustees have no discretion over the trust fund and must simply follow the (lawful) instructions of the beneficiary in relation to it. The beneficiary can therefore instruct the trustees to transfer the trust fund into his name at any time. Until then however, the trust fund will remain in the name of the trustees.

 

On the death of the beneficiary, the trust fund will form part of his estate and will be distributed according to the terms of his will, or by the laws of intestacy if there is no will.

 

A bare trust is usually evidenced by a trust deed which will set out the parties involved (ie. the person setting the trust up, the trustees and the beneficiary) and what assets are being transferred into it. The trust deed is signed by the person setting the trust up and the trustees, but not by the beneficiary.

 

Sadie

 

Hi Sadie,

 

I'm probably sending far too many messages to people, but I'm never sure whether anything I post will always be flagged up to anybody who's trying to help, so I always feel it necessary to send individual messages :???:.

 

Anyway, after many hours of trying, I think I have finally managed to post the trust docs on here, so would be very grateful for a definitive answer as to whether it is okay for me to keep please? I can find the words 'bare', 'revocable', 'irrevocable' ets scattered throughout, and can read it in so many different ways, I'm utterly confused.

 

Many thanks in anticipation,

 

Toots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

everyone who has posted on your thread

will automatically be alerted when anyone posts.

 

 

as you are via this email

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are all good Toots111. That seems to be an irrevocable trust. Clause 8.2 in particular makes it clear that ownership of the policy has transferred to the trustees (to hold on behalf of the beneficiary) and cannot be recalled to the person setting up the trust. It shouldn't be accessible to creditors or be treated as part of probate.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are all good Toots111. That seems to be an irrevocable trust. Clause 8.2 in particular makes it clear that ownership of the policy has transferred to the trustees (to hold on behalf of the beneficiary) and cannot be recalled to the person setting up the trust. It shouldn't be accessible to creditors or be treated as part of probate.

 

Hi steampowered, thanks for your reply.

 

However, as I am also a trustee, (so 3 trustees in total), doesn't that mean that I am an owner of the policy please? As such, from what I have researched, doesn't that mean that a creditor can therefore force me into whatever action they desire??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again and well done with posting the document :)

 

In it, there is a sentence that says the Trustees are holding any assets for the beneficiary/ies. I would have thought that didn't make you an owner. I'm sure the legal guys will confirm.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again and well done with posting the document :)

 

In it, there is a sentence that says the Trustees are holding any assets for the beneficiary/ies. I would have thought that didn't make you an owner. I'm sure the legal guys will confirm.

 

HB

 

Thanks HB, praying you're right!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi steampowered, thanks for your reply.

 

However, as I am also a trustee, (so 3 trustees in total), doesn't that mean that I am an owner of the policy please? As such, from what I have researched, doesn't that mean that a creditor can therefore force me into whatever action they desire??

The trustee's role is to hold the property on behalf of the beneficiaries. The trustee can't take the trust property for his/her own purposes.

 

You are also the settlor - see clause 8.2 which prohibits the trust property from being applied for your benefit. I don't think you could revoke the policy even if you wanted to.

 

If you are concerned (I don't think you should be concerned) you may remove yourself as trustee (see clause 7.5).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The trustee's role is to hold the property on behalf of the beneficiaries. The trustee can't take the trust property for his/her own purposes.

 

You are also the settlor - see clause 8.2 which prohibits the trust property from being applied for your benefit. I don't think you could revoke the policy even if you wanted to.

 

If you are concerned (I don't think you should be concerned) you may remove yourself as trustee (see clause 7.5).

 

Right, I don't know what's happened to the long post I sent earlier, but I'm now going to attempt to do it again. (Although I'll probably forget half of what I was asking on the initial one!).

 

Thank you steampowered.

 

I am basically trying to be 100% reassured that no creditors will ever be able to get their hands on the policy or it's proceeds, so that my daughters will have something to pay for my funeral with, and a small amount left over. I've just received my 1st CCJ, with another to follow shortly, so my stupid brain is in turmoil and this issue about the trust is driving me more mad than usual.

 

The notes at the beginning say that the Trustees are the legal owners of the policy, so it worries me that a creditor may be able to attach themselves to the policy, and gain the proceeds after I die.

 

For the life of me, I can't understand what 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4 mean - 8.1 to 8.3 worry me, as the words 'revocable' and 'irrevocable' appear, although 8.4 seems to be saying that the Settlor is an Excluded person and that this exclusion shall not be revocable. If I am an excluded person, even though I am a legal owner of the policy, does that mean that as there will never be any monies due to me, a creditor could not gain access to the monies please??

 

Will this Trust definitely not form part of my estate and therefore not have to be mentioned in my will, or go through probate?

 

Part C, Key Provisions, 4.1 makes it sound as though the trust can be changed, as it says 'which may be revocable during the Trust Period', but then says 'or irrevocable'????? 4.2 also gives the impression that the Trustees have the power to alter things and if this is an irrevocable trust, surely this wouldn't be the case?

 

6.3 also seems to be saying that the Trustees have the power to do things that I thought an irrevocable trust would not allow?

 

7.3 says that the Settlor has the power to appoint new Trustees, so could a creditor force me to add themselves as a new Trustee please? If so, they would obviously have the same power as the other Trustees?

 

8.2 gives me hope, as it is saying that the Settlor cannot gain from the Trust, (although I'm not sure why my exclusion from any proceeds gives me hope; I think I'm losing the plot in trying to understand what anything means !!!!).

 

I think the bottom line is that I'm praying that somebody on here can tell me, irrefutably, that this Trust is protected fully from my creditors? I need to be sure in my own mind that my daughters will get the proceeds. I have nothing else to leave them, so that's why I'm so stressed about this matter.

 

Between yourself and Sadie, I'm just hoping that you can confirm that this Trust is the right type for somebody in my position and that I can lay it to rest and concentrate on all of the other yukky things happening in my life at present. One thing laid to rest would be such a relief!!

 

Many thanks,

 

Toots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew I'd forget something; as the Trust docs show, this is a Discretionary Trust and from what I can gather, this type of trust is used where the Settlor wants the freedom to make changes to beneficiaries at any time?

 

If so, could a creditor force me to delete my present beneficiaries and add them instead please? (I'm thinking that this is a really important point).

 

Sorry to anybody who is reading/will read all of my diatribe today, I'm just trying to make sure I've covered every point that's worrying me.

 

I'm sure that's it now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The notes at the beginning say that the Trustees are the legal owners of the policy, so it worries me that a creditor may be able to attach themselves to the policy, and gain the proceeds after I die.

 

This is referring to the distinction between legal/beneficial ownership. You can find information on the subject online. In essence, the legal owner is the person who is the registered owner of a piece of property. The beneficial owner is the 'real' owner who is entitled to the property.

 

The legal owner of a property is the trustee. The beneficial/equitable owner is the beneficiary. This is a concept which applies across the law - for example, when someone dies the executor is the trustee and the persons due to inherit in the will are the beneficiaries. Another example - when you buy a house and send the money to a solicitor, the solicitor is the trustee (legal owner since the money is in the solicitor's bank account) but you are the beneficiary (beneficiary owner since belongs to you).

 

It is important to understand that the trustee only holds the property for the beneficiary. The trustee can't just take the property for his/herself.

 

For the life of me, I can't understand what 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4 mean - 8.1 to 8.3 worry me, as the words 'revocable' and 'irrevocable' appear, although 8.4 seems to be saying that the Settlor is an Excluded person and that this exclusion shall not be revocable. If I am an excluded person, even though I am a legal owner of the policy, does that mean that as there will never be any monies due to me, a creditor could not gain access to the monies please??
8.1 says the Trustees can declare that certain beneficiaries are not entitled to get the property. That is more relevant where you have a trust in favour of (for example) every student who graduated from Cambridge university during 2011, rather than a trust to benefit clearly defined individuals such as your daughters.

 

8.2 disregard

 

8.3 says a declaration made under 8.1 may be revocable or irrevocable. This has nothing to do with whether the trust itself is revocable or not.

 

8.4 says you are en Excluded Person. As set out in 8.1, this means you are totally excluded from benefiting from the trust fund and hence the money is not available to your creditors.

 

Part C, Key Provisions, 4.1 makes it sound as though the trust can be changed, as it says 'which may be revocable during the Trust Period', but then says 'or irrevocable'????? 4.2 also gives the impression that the Trustees have the power to alter things and if this is an irrevocable trust, surely this wouldn't be the case?
The revocability referred to in clause 4.1 is revocability of decisions about how to allocate the trust fund between beneficiaries, not revocability of the trust itself.

 

6.3 also seems to be saying that the Trustees have the power to do things that I thought an irrevocable trust would not allow?
No, it is common to see the trustees given very broad powers to use the trust funds as they see fit.

 

7.3 says that the Settlor has the power to appoint new Trustees, so could a creditor force me to add themselves as a new Trustee please? If so, they would obviously have the same power as the other Trustees?
Trustees are under statutory and common law duties to act in the interests of beneficiaries, not themselves.

 

8.2 gives me hope, as it is saying that the Settlor cannot gain from the Trust, (although I'm not sure why my exclusion from any proceeds gives me hope; I think I'm losing the plot in trying to understand what anything means !!!!).
Yes, 8.2 is very clear that the proceeds cannot be applied for your benefit. Payment of creditors would be an application for your benefit. To be honest this clause is not necessary as that is the whole concept of a trust, but I guess they might as well make it explicit.

 

I think the bottom line is that I'm praying that somebody on here can tell me, irrefutably, that this Trust is protected fully from my creditors? I need to be sure in my own mind that my daughters will get the proceeds. I have nothing else to leave them, so that's why I'm so stressed about this matter.
Yes, I am quite comfortable in telling you that this Trust is fully protected by creditors. You couldn't access the trust property (i.e. the insurance policy) even if you wanted to.

 

I knew I'd forget something; as the Trust docs show, this is a Discretionary Trust and from what I can gather, this type of trust is used where the Settlor wants the freedom to make changes to beneficiaries at any time?
Not the Settlor. Once a trust is in place, the Settlor no longer owns the property or has any control over it.

 

A fixed trust is where (for example) each beneficiary is entitled to 50% of the trust property. A discretionary trust means that the share of each beneficiary is not fixed. The trustees can allocate the trust funds between beneficiaries, but you still have to be a beneficiary to get anything.

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

THANKS SO MUCH steampowered, you're a star!!

 

I'm feeling a lot easier after reading your replies and am only left with two or three last questions, if you have the patience to reply again :wink:!

 

I don't know how to highlight/separate topics etc like you, but from the top of the last post;

 

Under 8.1, would it be necessary, or worth my doing, to add a clause to say that my creditors are excluded people please?

 

Under 7.3, if Trustees are there to act in the interests of the beneficiaries, is it/could it be, a problem that my two daughters are both Trustees and beneficiaries please? Should I have chosen somebody else to act as Trustees, instead of them? (Although I don't really have anybody else close enough to trust).

 

I've researched trusts so much over the past few days, ( maybe I should retrain as a solicitor now, although way too old unfortunately!!), and have repeatedly read that Discretionary Trusts allow Trustees to change beneficiaries. If that's correct, as I am the Settlor AND a Trustee, doesn't that mean that I have the power to make such changes, (in which case couldn't a creditor force me into adding them as a beneficiary?)? Or, would it need all 3 Trustees, myself and my daughters, to make any amendments to the beneficiaries please?

 

See, I'm almost there with my understanding, after getting your input steampowered :-). Just these last few points to clarify in my head and I think I might be able to let it go and concentrate on my other problems at last.

 

If I could hug you, I would!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Toots

 

According to Hayton & Mitchell: Commentary and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies Thirteenth Edition, the interests of the beneficiaries are paramount and the irreducible core content of the trust concept consists of a duty of the trustee to act for the beneficiaries’ interest, without this, a trust would not exist at all.

 

Ownership of trust property is vested in the trustees (or their nominees, although the trustees technically then own an interest in the property owned by the nominees), to be managed and dealt with wholly for the benefit of the beneficiaries – Smith v Anderson (1880) 15 Ch.D. 247

 

Therefore, under the trust instrument, you are holding funds/assets in trust for the beneficiaries only and the trust falls outside of your Estate for IHT/Probate purposes and as such, no creditor can make any claim against the trust property.

 

You can relax on this issue now with peace of mind in the knowledge that your children will receive the whole benefit of the funds/assets due and owed to them in law under the trust created by you.

 

The above matters together with Steampower’s posts here should enable you to concentrate on the other “yukky” matters. I wish you a Merry Christmas & a Happy New Year.

 

Sadie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creditor cannot force your hand to amend the trust, firstly because the trust falls outside of your Estate and secondly the powers confered under the trust to make any amendments are confered on trustees, thirdly the irreducible core concept of the trust cannot be interfered with/violated by your creditor.

 

Sadie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...