Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rbs say they cannot find my mortgage ppi payment as its over 6 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3272 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well all of what he is saying is that the insurance at the time was applicable and useful too you.

 

what you should have said , only, in the PPI questionnaire was

you were told in a closed room you had to take it out.

[he got a healthy commission out of you}

 

this is the pitfalls of speaking on the phone

and

putting down more than one reason for mis-sale on any forms

 

it gives them a get out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

bare the letter down.

 

disregard....

 

1. all what is said regarding 'it was on every statement' &

'we sent you booklets'

'it was on the agreement you sign' ,

you signed this or that

...so must have been aware of the PPI, why take XX yrs now to complain.

 

2.i've decided now xx yrs later, it was suitable for you at the time ..etc etc.

 

so then work out... what 'real' reason he using to reject your claim.

 

any reasons under 1&2 are 'mere speculation'

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX

Could you have a look at my reply and see what you think...

 

Dear

 

Thank you for your letter dated April 2015.

 

I would like to register my disapproval of your facts stated in the above letter and register an appeal to your decision thereof.

 

My objection is based on the fact you twice called me when I explicitly informed you I was busy

but you insisted that you only had a few questions.

 

 

On reflection, I now view the nature of your questions over the phone as, in the least misleading,

in the worst, rather loaded toward your intended rejection of my PPI complaint.

 

 

Despite me informing you I did not remember the exact details from 11 years ago

you persisited in channelling your own questions to suit your companies desired outcome.

This is very unfair.

 

Though a loyal RBS customer for many many years, I have been totally abused by your bank on a personal and business level and this episode further confirms that.

 

It is also pointless to say in your letter that ''you were informed/told this'' and that ''your signature was on the document''

I was told, in a closed room, alone with XXXX, that in order to obtain the overdraft I must take the PPI.

 

I have recovered notes relating to this, It was a bank loan I required as the overdraft facility was expensive.

My notes confirm that our earning to lending ratio was not good enough at the time but a way around this was the overdraft facility.

 

I would imagine the ombudsman will be very interested to here that you continued to collect payments from another account

not related to this overdraft for over two years after this account was closed!!

 

I expect you to reconsider your decision and upon receiving your reply I will review taking the matter to the ombudsman

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

edited in suggestions

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant DX thanks

On another claim

you may remember earlier in the thread that at a previous address many years ago I pad PPI.

 

 

They have written to me to say they dont have my records but have sent a cheque of £30 to cover my time during the enquiry.

 

 

I suspect they dont want to I've me the details as the claim will be high due to it being twenty years ago.

 

Any advice?

Thanks again

Exasp

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats this the mortgage PPI?

 

 

so you've no details whatsoever?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX

At the time when this happened we had a personal business manager who also looked after our personal affairs.

 

 

I remember having a confrontational argument with him re the PPI he had sold us and after some time discovering we could not claim on it.

 

 

I asked for the payments back but he said he could not do it.

 

 

This was 20 years ago and we cannot at this time find anything other than copies the original application forms for two accounts.

The PPI may or may not be on these.

 

Dont know if you know a magic way of getting the info but i remember you sayiong their no time limit on PPI

Thanks DX

Exasp

Link to post
Share on other sites

personal business manager - what at a bank?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

Sorry for the confusion!!

When i say personal business manager I mean that the same person dealt with us every time we went to the bank whether it personal or business.

 

 

He would often contact us when new mortgage rates came onto the market etc.

We did not deal with anyone else from memory until he left.

 

Being somewhat older and more experienced with banks its now apparent he was advising us for his own gain and the banks benefit but certainly not ours.

 

Is their a way of obtaining the info they say they have not got?

 

 

If we track down account numbers etc would that force them to release the information?

Thanks as usual

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...