Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
    • If you're sat there wondering how to attract and retain young talent, look no further. Find out what young people want from employers.View the full article
    • Toyota has apologised for providing incorrect or manipulated data for safety certification tests.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer Claim Form On:Line Finance 'debt'


gemstar01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

On Saturday I received a claim form through from Northampton for an old loan with On:Line Finance which ultimately sold the debt to Cabot which are now chasing me through the courts.

 

Below I have filled your form:

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial UK Limited

Date of issue – 17th September 2014

Timeline for defence - 19th October 2014

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

Please type out their particulars of claim (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

 

The claim is for the balance of instalments due and unpaid under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 under which On Line Finance agreed to sell the defendant goods for a price payable by instalments ("the Agreement").

The Agreement was assigned to the claimant on 30/09/2008.

 

PARTICULARS

1. Amount due and unpaid 8000

The claimant has complied with sections III and IV of Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS:

1. Amount due and unpaid 8000

 

What is the value of the claim? 8600£

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Motorloan

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. The Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes, October 2008, after I had last made a payment for the agreement

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Can't remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

 

Yes, regarding the repossession in 2004

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

 

I did enter a DMP yes, although my most recent payment to this was Sep 1st 2008.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I am sending off today a CCA and CPR requests to Cabot and Mortimer.

 

My question really is whether the debt should now be statute barred.

I have checked and checked my paperwork and I cannot find any payments other than the payment on Sep 1st 2008,

which was to a DMP (CCCS).

 

 

Cabot sent me letters after this, explaining they bought the debt and they wanted payments,

but, as far as I can tell, I never made a payment after Sep 2008.

 

 

They have somehow traced me to my current address, years later.

I'm not even sure i have ever directly communicated with Cabot.

 

They cite on the particulars that they were assigned the agreement on 30/9/2008,

but that doesn't make any difference in terms of SB if I haven't made a payment since 1/9/2008 right?

 

I plan to defend on the basis the debt is statute barred,

but any advice/help would be appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anything showing on your CRAs gemstar with regards to this loan?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then if it has shown in the past ...which implies that a default was placed in or around September 08 so in effect it should still be showing until the end of this month (Sept 14) then it has not reached its 6th anniversary ?

 

I personally would be submitting the statute barred defence...but the above is a little concerning.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok so the account was already in trouble and you was on a payment plan or reduced payments?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bumbled through after they repossessed in 2004 and

made limited payments through DMP when I could.

 

 

My mum then got cancer and died a while later,

I lost the plot,

moved house, and

lost track of mostly everything.

 

 

Years later they have slapped me with a claim form.

 

 

I checked my papers and

the most recent payment or acknowledgement I could find was a payment to the DMP on 1/9/2008.

 

 

The OC then sold the debt to Cabot on 30/9/2008, but I don't think i ever made a payment to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledge the claim now (if not already) using MCOL and then submit the following:-

 

 

Here is a form of limitation defence to a claim based upon a simple contract. There may be other grounds of defence in this particular case, but this defence alone will serve to defeat the claim assuming the facts stated in it are true.

 

 

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 17th September 2014.

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a form of limitation defence to a claim based upon a simple contract. There may be other grounds of defence in this particular case, but this defence alone will serve to defeat the claim assuming the facts stated in it are true.

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 17th September 2014.

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

 

Thanks Andy. To clarify, I should write everything in your quote, including the sentence in pink? Just put the whole thing in the defence box in MCOL?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not the pink that was for your benefit :madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope you would...its your thread:lol:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, so a quick update on this one.

 

I sent my statute barred defence off on 23rd September. The same day I sent off a statute barred letter to Cabot, and a CCA request.

 

The following week my defence was acknowledged by the court and also the solicitors (Mortimer Clarke).

 

Then, on the 15th October, I received a letter stating that due to them not having the information to comply with the CCA request, they would not be pursuing collection of the account.

 

So, I guess the question is, what should I be doing now? Are the court (CCBC) obliged to inform me if a claim against me has been struck out or discontinued? I haven't had anything from the court since they sent me a letter stating they had received my defence and would be forwarding onto the claimant, and that was at the beginning of October. I also never got anything more from Mortimer Clarke.

 

If I ring up the court, will they be able to tell me if the claim has been discontinued, and if I find out it hasn't (maybe stayed instead), do I need to be getting a set aside for this?

 

Any help appreciated xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

"So, I guess the question is, what should I be doing now? Nothing Are the court (CCBC) obliged to inform me if a claim against me has been struck out or discontinued? Yes I haven't had anything from the court since they sent me a letter stating they had received my defence and would be forwarding onto the claimant, and that was at the beginning of October. I also never got anything more from Mortimer Clarke.Thats because nothing is happening

 

If I ring up the court, will they be able to tell me if the claim has been discontinued,no need to see above and if I find out it hasn't (maybe stayed instead), do I need to be getting a set aside for this?" Nothing to set a side

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

So surely, if the court are obliged to tell me if a claim has been discontinued, which they haven't done so, then surely the claim is still active? In which case I should be doing something? Nobody has actually told me the court claim has now been stopped, which is why I feel as though I should be doing something. And if the claim is still active, then surely it's the claim that needs to be set aside?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...when a claim is issued and a defence is submitted with no response from the claimant and the claimant has not instructed the court to proceed then it is nothing more than a speculative claim...only when its allocated to track does it become a claim.

 

You cant set a side a claim only a judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh right, so because it hasn't been allocated a track (which I assume is after the questionnaire stage and would mean I would know about it), then it isn't even a claim so it's basically now null and void?

 

Does this mean that with regards to this particular claim with this particular claim number, can they continue this process at any time or would they need to start a new claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can make application to resurrect the claim by lifting the stay...with justification subject to how long it remains stayed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really...if you make application to lift the stay you have to have justification and reason on what your application is based on......which cant be "I dont want a stayed claim."

 

If they make application to lift the stay you can oppose it for whatever reason you consider fitting...but the longer its left stayed the harder it is for them to ressurect.

 

So in other words ...forget about it for now and prepare for Xmas:-D

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...