Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not really. His claim will succeed simply because its a simple matter of a lost parcel and no insurance. Its not a complex case so I think he’ll be fine, especially as it is P2G who arent very good at defending claims but I ageee its not been handled at all well.   My only concern with withdrawing is that he loses £35 in the case of £240 but thats a matter for him   I dont think it has a reduced chance of success if OP actually replies and actions things but if not then ofcourse it will struggle.   My concern is if he starts again it’ll be just as sporadic.   Maybe close thread and let him make a new one if hes ready to engage?
    • Please will you start reading up on the stories on the some form especially the pinned post. I have to say that I'm concerned that you feel that a warning from P2G is going to affect your rights and is going to subvert statutory law. I think you've been here for a few months and I would have hoped that by now you would understand that terms and conditions must always be interpreted in the light of overriding statute. Also I suggested that once you have done the reading on the sub- forum then you would understand the information that we would need in order to give you the best help. The fact that you haven't told us what the item was suggested also that you haven't done the reading. Please give us full details including identity of the item, value, where these properly declared? Dates – blah blah blah. Not paying attention to P2G. Pay attention to us
    • P2G can make clear whatever they want frankly, the judge isnt going to sit there and go “they told you to buy their insurance and you didn’t” and then dismiss your claim.  I would say you should send a formal complaint then after 7 days sent a LOC. Day 21 from now submit your claim on OCMC.    
    • I thought i could just use ( copy and paste)  the terminology from my other post earlier in the year when i previously claimed against P2g .   The parcel hasnt been 'officially ' lost yet i have another 13 days before their 'investigation' ends and then theyll probably offer the postage back as i didnt take the 'insurance'   But to recap ,  The parcel was booked through P2g and sent with Evri. No Protective Insurance was taken out. The parcels value is only £48 plus postage of £3 and the value of the parcel was declared The parcels tracking says while it was in Evri's system it was sent to an 'incorrect' depot and tracking would be updated in 24 hrs which it didnt and the delivery date passed, i then had a live chat with P2g who opened an investigation and im waiting to hear what's happened. My only concern is,  last time i claimed P2g made it clear that in future i must take out their protective insurance which i gavent and im wondering whether this will ' complicate' things ...  
    • it is precisely for these reasons that the OP should withdraw the claim and begin again. Firstly, the case has been badly handled from the start. The OP hasn't come to us and stuck to it in a regular engaging way. Secondly, it seems that the OP is now being advised on the basis of it being a matter of principle rather than looking at a sensible and pragmatic outcome. We have a duty to the people who come to help us to try and get the best solution for them that we can. Secondary is that we want to notch up a further victory against the parcel delivery industry – and frankly it doesn't matter which company it is as long as we get a victory. If we simply urge someone to continue a case at their own expense in a claim which has a very reduced chance of success, simply because it gives us personal satisfaction, then this is really contrary to what we do and certainly contrary to the interests of the claimant. I'm now urging the OP (Original Poster) to withdraw and to start again and work with us very closely in order to get a much more certain victory. By continuing this claim, not only with the OP risk even more money, it will take more time in the sense of failure will be demoralising. Better to feel that one is in control by exercising one's own choices and taking the long view
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank of Scotland Shortfall- being chased by Drydensfairfax. Is it legit?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Property was mortgaged in my sole name via Bank of Scotland. Account taken out in 2006.

 

Was repossessed in 2009 following my redundancy in late 2008 and failure to pay.

 

I had already left the property and wasn't involved with any of the process to repossess at the time.

I didn't hear anything regarding the sale and subsequent shortfall until a letter from Henderson Booth & Snell (debt recovery agents)

acting on behalf of Bank of Scotland on 27th November 2012.

 

They stated the shortfall to be £26,XXX and offered the me the opportunity to pay a full and final settlement amount of £9,XXX

or alternatively they would limit my personal liability to 50% of the original amount if I paid £50/month.

 

Shaken that it was a large amount of money that had finally caught up with me,

I filled in the standing order form and duly paid £50 per month every month from January 2013

onwards in order to limit my responsibility to ~£13,000.

 

On 24th July I received a cover letter from Bank of Scotland telling me that they had withdrawn my account from Henderson Booth & Snell

and passed it to Drydensfairfax.

 

The accompanying letter from Drydensfairfax states I owe £25,XXX and as I have been making payments

they consider the account not to be in dispute.

They are asking me to make a repayment offer.

 

Today I've received a follow up letter from drydens headed 'Notice of Recovery Action' giving me a final opportnuity to respond.

 

I don't know what to do next and how to respond?

 

I cancelled my standing order to Henderson Booth & Snell as soon as I received the letter, so my final payment to them was 12th July.

I calculate that I paid £950 to them between January 2013 and July 2014.

 

I've checked my credit report and my account with Bank of Scotland is showing as closed and 'satisfied' in May 2010

(one month after the property was sold at auction in April 2010).

No other mention of this on my credit report at all under any other ownership.

 

Having received the second letter from Drydens

I am now extremely sceptical as to whether the first letter did originate from Bank of Scotland

as both letters sent to me have the same return address, bar codes and font style used.

 

The Bank of Scotland logo is faint and looks scanned in.

The only information communicated on the Bank of Scotland page is my mortgage account number

and balance owed.

 

Are Drydens trying it on here???

 

The Bank of Scotland letter uses a PO Box 66, Rosyth, KY11 2WG address and the name on it is Paul Cameron.

 

If my account is showing as 'satisfied' on my credit file, do I have to do anything?

 

Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

look like you got had in the first place by HB&S

if they were offering such a HUGE discount

did this not alert you to something being a bit 'strange'?

 

is there any record of your payments ACTUALLY making their way through to HBOS

by way of statements from them?

 

something smells here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I was definitely had by HB&S,

something I'm not exactly thrilled about but could write off in my head

if it turns out that BOS have already written this off and the debt collectors are chancing it!

 

I'm sensing some link between HB&S and Drydensfairfax here.

 

The more I look at the first letter supposedly from BOS introducing me to drydensfairfax,

the more I'm convinced it didn't originate from BOS at all.

 

It's worth pointing out that I have never received any correspondence directly from BOS

- demands, statements, notice of assignments, nothing!

 

I know I was stupid to pay HB&S but what's my next move?

A prove it letter to drydensfairfax?

 

I'm reluctant to send an SAR to BOS as I've had no contact with them at all and don't want to prompt them doing anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

me thinks you've been had.

 

were HBOS aware of your new address?

 

who, in their letters

were HB&S's 'client'

 

you should of been receiving better than yearly statements too.

 

it is quite 'legal' for a notice of assignment letter

to be sent 'on behalf of' the OC if the debt is sold.

 

however, one questions the legality if the OC has never written to you DIRECTLY about the shortfall.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go read those other threads too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, have read the other threads.

 

I have 2 searches on my credit file, both conducted on the same date in Jan 2014 described as 'Admin reviews'.

One recorded as 'Bank of Scotland Plc (Sr, Sa, Tac) HBOS'

one recorded as 'Bank of Scotland Plc (Sr, Sa, Tac) HBOS Mortgage Recoveries (HendersonBoothsnell)'

 

Assuming HBS where acting on behalf of BOS (as they claimed)

then BOS had the opportunity to write to me and chose not to (as HBS had my address).

 

Presumably if those credit searches are BOS then again, they've got my correct details and not contacted me.

They haven't contacted me at my last known address prior to purchasing the property that was repossessed,

which was my parents address used on my original mortgage application.

 

The last shown amount in default on my credit file before the account was marked as 'satisfied' was £20,XXX.

 

I originally purchased the property for £146,XXX with a mortgage of £131,XXX.

My last known statement had a balance of £129,XXX.

They apparently sold the house for £122,XXX although I only know this figure due to it being mentioned on the drydensfairfax letter.

 

So, should I acknowledge drydensfairfax denying liability and ask them to prove it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it 'looks' like HB&S were acting OBO of BOS

 

so that will be deemed as contact by the OC.

 

so the shortfall was about £7k not the £9k even after this 'discount'

 

time for an sar to HBOS me thinks before you do anything further

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose what I don't understand is why BOS would mark my account as satisfied in May 2010

and then have HB&S contact me in Nov 2012?

 

At no point did HB&S say they had purchased the debt from BOS,

just they were acting on their behalf.

 

Same with drydensfairfax, albeit with a dodgy intro letter proporting to be BOS.

 

I'm surmising that the difference between what I originally borrowed and what it sold for was £7k,

but the last amount shown on my credit file just after the sale of the property was £20k,

it was then immediately marked as satisfied.

 

I expect the difference to be made up of mortgage arrears, interest, charges and fees associated with the sale.

Either way, the figures claimed by the 2 debt collection firms were £26k???

 

If BOS did write it off and mark it as 'satisfied'

am I opening up a can of worms by sending the SAR

or will they just reply with the facts and treat is as satisfied?

 

Presumably if I send the SAR to BOS I am ok ignoring drydensfairfax in the meantime?

 

Thanks- really appreciate your help so far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a game of chess.

 

information is they key here mind.

 

like you. i'd surmise the £7k was PPI/insurance/arrears fees/ etc etc

 

which is why an sar wuld prove very useful.

 

I doubt it would alert anyone to anything

 

as its a legal document & your right to request one

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...