Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It’s all unsecured loans and credit cards. Mainly loans now though as most credit cards are paid off.   so 95% unsecured loans.   I just don’t know my situation job wise it’s almost impossible to say whether it’s likely or not just don’t want to be caught out by it. My mental health trying to pay this off has taken a huge hit also if I’m being honest. I feel like mentally I need some kind of respite and the credit file cost is something I can accept also. 
    • Depends on whether part of the roof needs to be replaced and whether it is a standard roof type,  but the works should only take a day or two. Someone I know had a whole semi-detached roof replaced in about 12 hours. Suggest you put it in writing to the business about the issues you mention in your post.  Also as business premises, you could also apply pressure by contacting local Council if necessary. 
    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Firstplus/Eversheds - going for repo again - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the court date is on the 8th September

 

 

I don't think there is any remit for them to reduce the payments?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH]53068[/ATTACH]

 

Here is a copy of my letter.

 

In case it can't be viewed

 

Dear Sir/Madam

I am writing with reference to my account that I have with First Plus and its current status there are a number of issues that I wish to address.

Firstly, after a period of severe depression for which I am currently receiving medication for, I find that I have now been diagnosed with another illness, type 2 diabetes The ramifications of this is that I am tired and feeling very poorly all the time and until it is controlled I am unable to do overtime, hopefully this is a temporary situation.

The consequences of this for my loan with you are as follows;

I was paying in the region of £55 per month off the arrears that I have with you. Because I am not receiving overtime at the moment I will have to reduce this amount to £35.00 per month off the arrears.

My budget shows that I am still able to make my normal monthly contractual payment of £195 per month and £35 off the arrears which totals £230 per month. I appreciate that this not ideal for us both however my hands are tied.

Looking at my calculation on the sums above I will have paid off my arrears in May 2018 which is before the loan has fully been paid up. I can assure you that will pay this amount each month and tell you when my when my circumstances change when they do change I will prioritise clearing these arrears as quickly as I can. I enclose a copy of my household budget to confirm my situation.

Secondly, I have had a look at my credit file and despite the fact that I have paid you £215 per month for a long period of time you have put default after each payment date. As I am sure you can imagine this has had a damaging effect on my credit file. I would be grateful if the payments that I am making are recorded on my credit file.

I am aware that my illness, my financial status, and my lack of understanding is not your problem and that you are only there to service my account but I would be grateful if you could accept this explanation of my current situation and process these details as soon as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that the spreadsheet you have provided is a direct copy from the statements?

 

The PPI refund was made to the account and the balance reduced to some £17,600 from £23,600 so that seems ok.

 

From then on the monthly interest being applied to the account has reduced which again would be correct.

 

So from the PPI point of view it would seem that things have been done correctly.

 

I am sure that the lender should have advised you of interest rate changes over the years but I think you said that they had not.

 

Can you please post that letter that Ell-enn has asked for.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21, thank you so much for you help.

 

Please see posting above for the letter that I sent in, informing them of my reduction in arrears payments.

 

Just looking at the figures above they are from the statements sent to me, but I have the computer printout which I will type out this morning and they present a very different story.

 

Once again thank you.

 

2me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi me2, looking as requested.

Let's clear up the credit report question first, the reason the " D " markers are there is that any " arrangement to pay" is in its self a default of the terms & conditions (payment lower than that contractually required).

 

 

The " D " markers are in fact better than having an "arrangement to pay" (AP) marker showing, this is because the defaulted account will be removed from the record on the 6th anniversary of the default date, the AP markers will stay until the arrangement ends/or the debt is cleared.

 

 

Ims has explained that the figures look ok and I agree.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all again!!!!!!!

 

I am typing all the figures off the computerised sheet but it is taking some time for me to type out. I have attached a sheet of the figures that I am querying

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]53063[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you cant click and read your attachments we cant.

 

 

you need to PDF them please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the docs you provided in post #37 together with your previously posted spreadsheet and I can see how they have arrived at their figures.

 

That document appears to be from around February this year.

 

At that point in time you had missed 14 contractual payments at £195.05 = £2,730.70. Against that you had made payments against the arrears of 1 x £10, 27 x £14.95 and 9 x £54.95 which total to £908.20. Take one from the other and you end up with an arrears balance of £1,822.50 which is pretty close to what they say of £1,863.08.

 

As regards your query on the interest rates, these are given on the posted sheet so you should be able to see those over the period of the loan assuming you got one of those sheets for each month.

 

They should have notified you in writing of any interest rate changes I believe but I don't think that in itself is going to be of huge significance in the forthcoming hearing.

 

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

The overriding principle of a PPI reclaim is that the claimant should be put back in the position he would have been in had the PPI not been applied in the first place. Now the way I interpret that is that had you not had PPI in the first place then your contractual payment would have been less. When the PPI refund was made to the account then my view is that the repayment amount should have reduced. This would ensure that the term of the loan would stay the same.

 

Making an increased payment over and above this (for example the amounts you are now paying) would reduce the arrears quicker and potentially shorten the life of the loan.

 

However, it seems from what you say that the lender has not reduced the monthly repayment amount so you are not paying in accordance with being in the position you would have been in had the PPI not been added.

 

Ell-enn will no doubt comment on this because as you have been paying the higher amount of £195 + extra, it could be argued that your arrears balance is inflated and this may well be worth a mention to the court.

 

In fact, given that the repayments would have been £33.97 less each month and up to February you had made 37 payments then the total there is £33.97 x 37 = £1,256.89 which makes an impact on the arrears figure.

 

Finally, on the sheet you posted you queried why the refund cheque they sent you was added to the loan. You have to look at the whole refund situation as a whole. They actually credited the account with the full premium and the interest. They are only allowed to hang on to an amount to clear the arrears so as they credited the whole amount, the reduction in the balance was greater than it should have been and so the cheque refund they made to you shows as a payment out of the account so that the net refund to the account is correct.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the docs you provided in post #37 together with your previously posted spreadsheet and I can see how they have arrived at their figures.

 

That document appears to be from around February this year.

 

At that point in time you had missed 14 contractual payments at £195.05 = £2,730.70. Against that you had made payments against the arrears of 1 x £10, 27 x £14.95 and 9 x £54.95 which total to £908.20. Take one from the other and you end up with an arrears balance of £1,822.50 which is pretty close to what they say of £1,863.08.

 

.

 

ims21 you are a star...

How you calculated that I will never know and I have to say I am in awe

 

Thank you

 

2me2u

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards your query on the interest rates, these are given on the posted sheet so you should be able to see those over the period of the loan assuming you got one of those sheets for each month.

 

They should have notified you in writing of any interest rate changes I believe but I don't think that in itself is going to be of huge significance in the forthcoming hearing.

 

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

.

 

ims21

 

They have never ever mentioned an increase in the interest rates and that is reflected in the incomplete SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

The overriding principle of a PPI reclaim is that the claimant should be put back in the position he would have been in had the PPI not been applied in the first place. Now the way I interpret that is that had you not had PPI in the first place then your contractual payment would have been less. When the PPI refund was made to the account then my view is that the repayment amount should have reduced. This would ensure that the term of the loan would stay the same.

 

Making an increased payment over and above this (for example the amounts you are now paying) would reduce the arrears quicker and potentially shorten the life of the loan.

 

However, it seems from what you say that the lender has not reduced the monthly repayment amount so you are not paying in accordance with being in the position you would have been in had the PPI not been added.

 

Ell-enn will no doubt comment on this because as you have been paying the higher amount of £195 + extra, it could be argued that your arrears balance is inflated and this may well be worth a mention to the court.

 

In fact, given that the repayments would have been £33.97 less each month and up to February you had made 37 payments then the total there is £33.97 x 37 = £1,256.89 which makes an impact on the arrears figure.

 

 

Thank you again so much. I have been paying every month I have not missed a payment this year so yes that will have a good impact on the overall arrears.

 

There are two figures on the above sheets one is near the apr and it mentions accural 5843.6224 what is that?

 

And the other is additional interest mentioned in the small print in of the statements which on 8th April 2011 was £889.77 and has now risen to the tune of £4857.31 which equates to another £99 per month???? Now this scares me and I have never seen this before on the balance sheet.

 

Once again thank you I was truly desperate and I thought I had really messed up.

 

2me2u

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...