Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Not Recieved Wages x Employers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I would like to ask for some advice on behalf of my nephew.

 

End of December 2013 my nephew was sacked by his company due to their strict "time off rules". Since being made unemployed my nephew has not received wages that's owed to him.

 

Before i go on, i must say the account he had with the Leeds Building Society, there must be the minimum £100 in the account at all times. Because of this rule and being unemployed he withdrew the full amount and closed the account.

 

He had contacted his x employers on several occasions, letter,phone then out of the blue, a couple of months later they decied to pay what was owed to him into his building society. But by the time they decide to do this there was no bank account to pay wages into.

 

He knew nothing of this payment until he contacted his x employers once again, only to be told his money had now been payed to LBC. He contacted LBC + they sent him a letter, saying they had received a payment from his x employers but was unable to accept it due to account being closed and payment was returned. On the back of this, his x employers had his details so why did they not send a cheque or contact him.

 

His x employers denided that the payment was returned by LBC and to sort it out with them. But LBC have been very cooperative with him, where x employers have not.

 

Can someone advise on the best plan of action next in retrieving wages unpaid from his ex employers.

 

Thank you for your time to all that respond.

 

Daniel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniel182

 

Tell your nephew not to speak to his ex employers over the phone. Write them a LBA letter, send it Recorded Delivery. Give them 14 days to make payment.

 

Amend the following to apply to your nephews case.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

My pay advice slip of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx indicated that xxx would be paid into my nominated bank account.

 

As of today xxxxxxx payment has still not been received.

 

You should be aware that it is unlawful to with-hold payment of due wages without consent, by virtue of section 13 of the Employments Rights Act 1996.

 

Please accept this as formal notification that unless the full amount due and payable is not transferred into my account within 14 days of the above date, then I will pursue recovery in the small claims Court and be seeking costs.

 

I trust you will give this matter immediate attention.

 

Yours faithfully

 

xxxxxxxxxxx

p.s. If you can get a letter from Leeds saying that the payment has been rejected and returned, send a copy of that too, keep the original. Tell them in the letter, payment can be made by cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

[/url]Hello rebel11

 

Taking out weekends and a day for the signed letter to get to it's destination. It's been exactly 14 days today July 1st 2014, and no reply in a way of letter or cheque. I have an email address for the CO, should a email be sent to him explaining everything that has happened or strait to Small Claims?

 

Also, as his x employers attempted to pay the wages into his bank account even though payment was a very long time over due. Will this do anytng to the case?

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that they tried to pay the money into a closed account will only carry a small amount of weight. They had his address and could have sent payment directly to him at any time.

He could get someone to telephone the company boss and say that as payment hasnt been made it will now go to the small claims procedure and that costs of £50 court fees will be added, along with any other cost so they had better get payment to him in 2 days or it will be too late. That normally gets a response but not always. Sometimes you get action after the claim hits the doormat and you have to point out that the court costs must be paid as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact they tried to make payment adds weight to your case as it confirms the debt is due

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello

 

Just want to fill in fellow repliers what's been happening over the last month. Well the nephew has been in communication with several employees of the company who owe him wages. I wanted to help him go strait to small claims after advice from you, the "consumeractiongroup members" but my nephew declined. Well he's still getting the run around via emails stating the money going to be forward to his new account.

 

The bank manager advised my nephew to go for compensation when filling out small claims forms.

 

I would be so grateful if someone could please advise about going for compensation when filling out small claims forms. It's been 9 months since the nephew was let go, and 8 months trying to get is wages outstanding.

 

What kind of compensation would be adequate for 8 months of hassle? Any advice will be most welcome.

 

Thank you for your time.

 

Daniel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any compensation would have to be justified and would be to offset any losses incured as a result of breach of contract.

 

you will need proof of losses. One easy example is any bank charges and interest you may of had to have paid as a result of not being paid. These would have to be backed up by statements etc

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately the only compensation you can claim is for actual losses so things like the cost of telephone calls and letters, overdraft interest and other cost directly attributable to the failure of employer to pay up are all you can claim. Very rarely can you claim for loss of opportunity but you will have to show that something was agreed (deposit on motorbike paid for example and then couldnt buy the bike becuse of lack of funds equal to the witheld money) and then could not be concluded and therefore a claim can be made for the increased costs now incurred to get the same deal.

Starting a claim usually focusses the minds of a company as if the debt is more than £700 a HCEO can be used to enforce it and they have very wide ranging powers when it comes to businesses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniel182

 

Why is your nephew reluctant to lodge a claim through the courts, that is your first hurdle, it's fairly straight forwards if the facts are as he states. The longer this goes on the more confidence his former employers will gain.

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/law_w/law_legal_system_e/law_taking_legal_action_e/small_claims.htm

 

Thread moved to General Legal Forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Once again, thank you for the replies.

 

rebel11 wrote: Why is your nephew reluctant to lodge a claim through the courts?

 

He's a young kid, and i wouldn't say he's being reluctant, just a little naive. Believe it or not the company are being more cooperative this time round and keep telling him they are going to put is money into is account, when he goes into the bank no money been entered. And this little joke of theirs has been happening for the last month. I personally think the company are taking the biscuit. It's going to be put through small claims now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Daniel182

 

Proceed with the claim for £60 costs, inform the courts that they have paid the debt, but are trying to avoid costs.

 

So you want a judgment for £60 costs plus section 69 interest.

 

Could you post their defence without personal details or ref numbers.

 

 

 

Hello

 

Small Claims was issued and payment finally received. I say received, the company did not pay for the £60.00 cost.

 

The company have also filed a defence on 15/09/2014.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, another £60 doesn't have to be paid. It's refering to the £60 costs to make the claim that you haven't got back.

You are entitled to claim interest on the claim, it's called Section 69.

 

Read down to claiming interest:-

 

Starting court action - AdviceGuide

 

£60.00 claim got to be paid for this? 69 interest! Please can you enlighten me what this is? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hello rebel11

 

Thanks for reply, i'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner.

 

 

£60.00 claim got to be paid for this? 69 interest! Please can you enlighten me what this is?

I'm not sure what you mean by above, i've checked PM and cannot find any reference to it.

 

 

whether you wish to proceed now that a defence has been submitted

The court recommends the The Small Mediation route, both parties talking. The plan is to recoup the £60.00 court fee. Which would be best? Take court action or ADR?

 

When you say claim interest, are you referring to ADR?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your nephew didn't claim interest when the claim was issued he'd have to apply to amend the claim, and this would mean an additional fee.. Section 69 interest, which is 8%, may be awarded at the courts discretion, but I'm guessing this wasn't included in the claim.

 

Unless there is good reason not to, I think the court would expect you to try mediation.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was the claim struck out?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you see a copy of the application to strike out the claim?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...