Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
    • Why are FCA’s “name and shame” proposals causing a stir?View the full article
    • I am coming back to this thread after receiving a Single envelope containing 2 letters: 1 from Max Recovery telling me that my account was transferred to Drydens Fairfax in 2007 1 from Drydens Fairfax telling me that they are under instruction from their client to seek repayment.   These relate to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019, but neither of the letters are from Barclays themselves.   I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of changes of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details have been received, which ive ignored.   What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per previous advice? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JSA and Sick note for 3 months


THNX4THT
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My ex was on incapacity and he was told he was fit for work, and now claims JSA. His doctor has given him a sick note "unfit for work" for 3 months. I can't imagine he'll still get JSA, I may well be wrong....What will he be able to claim anad will it be at a reduced amount?

 

The other thing I wanted to ask on his behalf, he has to sign weekly although he is currently staying at his daughters address. I thought you had to sign weekly if you didnt have a safe address to receive communication or possible giros, (its paid into his account).

 

Any ideas as to why he would have to sign on weekly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sick note is of no use to a JSA claimant. The maximum sick time available is two periods of up to 14 days in any given year. So if he's not fit for work, he will need to claim ESA instead. The basic ("assessment") rate of ESA is the same as JSA.

 

Some claimants are asked to sign weekly once they've been claiming for a certain period of time - maybe 13 weeks or so? It's fairly common and, while annoying, isn't anything to worry about.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sick note is of no use to a JSA claimant. The maximum sick time available is two periods of up to 14 days in any given year. So if he's not fit for work, he will need to claim ESA instead. The basic ("assessment") rate of ESA is the same as JSA.

 

Some claimants are asked to sign weekly once they've been claiming for a certain period of time - maybe 13 weeks or so? It's fairly common and, while annoying, isn't anything to worry about.

Even if he's been turned down for ESA (Incapacity no longer existing) he will be able to claim ESA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if he's been turned down for ESA (Incapacity no longer existing) he will be able to claim ESA?

 

On what date did his IB/IS or ESA stop? Was it more than six months ago?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:THNX4THT:

 

Well that's answered the question about whether it was a reassessment of incapacity benefit for a conversion award of employment n support. How long is it since the date of the decision?

 

If your ex partner feel he meets the criteria for an award of employment n support allowance, and it's not yet a month since the date of the decision, he should consider asking Jobcentreplus to 'look at their decision again', technically known as 'mandatory reconsideration'. Can be done over the phone, but best done in writing via recorded delivery, cos they 'lose' a lot of verbal requests.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/esa214-a-guide-to-employment-and-support-allowance-the-work-capability-assessment

 

Exceptional/special circumstances at pages 10 - 12.

 

Descriptors of activities that are relevant to the workplace at pages 18 - 28.

 

There isn't an official form to request mandatory reconsideration but Leicester Welfare Rights have helpfully donated a template for Citizens Advice;

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/benefits_e/benefits_sick_and_disabled_people_and_carers_ew/employment_and_support_allowance.htm

 

After longer than a month, unless there was a good reason (serious illness, bereavement type things) it's too late to request reconsideration.

 

Within six months of the date of a 'fit for work' decision a new claim for employment n support can only be paid from the outset for a different condition or a deteriorating condition.

 

Should your ex partner decide to stick with jobseekers, he should ask to see a disability employment adviser as soon as possible. He may be able to negotiate reduced conditionality for his jobseekers agreement/claimant commitment. Advisers are supposed to make allowances for limitations caused by medical conditions. For example, he can't be mandated to apply for shelf stacking in a warehouse if respiratory problems limit lifting and walking.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...