Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CT from 2009


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ida could you perhaps help me out a little. I am at a bit of a loss what to do.

 

My council produced an outstanding CT bill from 2009, and after a little bit of a dispute I agreed to pay in instalments. I paid my first instalment, then I have missed my second one, with the end result being my bill got sent to Charles Anderson. It turns out when I made my first payment to them, they applied it to my current bill, so it looked like I had never paid anything after making the arrangement. Now I am always in constant contact with my CT office, and I have repeatedly explained to them that I have ADHD and difficulties because of that. I certainly havent tried to avoid the problem, I just need them to be more help rather than hindrance.

 

Anyway, the be all and end all is that they are not willing to budge on this and I am obviously going to have to fight them. However, I have Charles Anderson breathing down my neck now and need some advice on how to deal with them. I would obviously like the council to act more appropriately, but that isnt going to happen in 2 weeks.

 

What can I do in the meantime? I feel I am being bullied here, and considering mental health problems, should not be victimised like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Madscot sorry for the late reply,

 

Ive made a thread of your own so can be seen.

 

Can you confirm if you have recieved a charge for payment?

 

What council? you can pm this info if you dont want to post on thread.

 

But keep everything else to here :)

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its fine Ida, I wont give out grief to anyone who offers their time for people :D I am grateful.

 

Regarding the current situation, I got myself a charity to act as an advocate, and we have the council holding proceedings to give us time to sort it out.

 

The council in question is North Lanarkshire and as far as I am concerned they are nothing short of bullies. Throughout my adult life I have fought with them and been penalised by them, both financially and mentally.

 

This particular bill had a 10% surcharge added to it first, and now it has further charges incurred by Charles Anderson.

 

Throughout my dealings with NLC, I have repeatedly told them I have problems and asked them for help but they have absolutely no provisions in place for dealing with people who have mental health issues. Apparantly if you cant see it, it doesnt count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The amount due will have increased as there is an automatic penalty of 10% if a summary warrant has been granted against you.

 

Once a Summary Warrant has been granted as has in your case, the debt will be passed to the Sheriff Officers, you should contact the sheriff officers and come to a repayment arrangement. Make sure you come to an arrangement that you will be able to stick to. It is better to pay a little on a regular basis over a longer period of time than to try to pay too much, leave yourself short and miss payments.

 

As Ida has asked, have you received a 'Charge for Payment'.

 

If you have you will get time to pay these arrears, and are you up to date with your current council tax.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if I have a "charge for payment" as I dont know what that is. I do have a summary warrant but I have basically fought them and had a hold put on the case.

 

As for my current council tax, its a mess as well. I have been waiting for more than 2 months on a decision on my CT, and nothing seems to be coming, so I just keep getting these demands and unpaid bills I dont understand. I have filled out their forms and phoned them to try and hurry them but still no result.

 

Everytime I ask for help from them to make this less complicated I just get refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had/am having a dispute over council tax myself.

One thing I always do though is use email/letters to communicate where possible as it leaves a paper trail you can refer back to. Phonecalls are notorious for not being honored or traced if needed etc.

 

A letter or email (used to follow a phone call if you need to phone) allows you more time to plan what you say with any support you may be receiving.

 

Oh sounds picky but do not use the word vicitimisation. In your case it is not accurate. Disability Discrimination are the words you should be using. :)

Getting this right opens up, I imagine, a lot more room to maneuver if it comes down to the nitty gritty. Discrimination on the grounds of disability opens up all sorts of avenues so it is important to get this right.

 

FYI - Victimisation is receiving less favorable treatment due to you using a statutory right or procedure (Or aiding someone else that does) eg being bullied if you lodge a complaint or being a witness for someone that lodges a complaint would be some examples of victimisation.

 

Hope that helps a little, im sure someone with more knowledge will be along soon

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments Sabre. On re-reading my documents, the summary warrant was granted against me in 2009, and this is now a Charge for Payment they have issues. Just to give you guys an update, my council are behaving like spolied children. Ive had word from my advocate that the council basically arent speaking to them and CA are just restating what they said before.

 

This basically all happened because I became self employed and Ive had over 1k in council tax demands since October. So much for helping people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...