Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC Tax Allowance


chiefmegawatty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I thought the income tax threshold was over £9000 per year, but HMRC have proved me wrong. The only income I have if from private pension which consists of two pensions that add up to £7,520 per year.

I see from my recently received P60 that HMRC are deducting tax from my pension.

Is there a lower tax allowance / threshold for people on low private pensions?

I assume there must be otherwise HMRC wouldn't deduct anything.

 

Around four years ago I was living on a pension of £4.500 per year and HMRC decided to deduct 40% of my small pension and allocated me a tax code of zero !! This resulted in me having just £51 per week to live on and pay my bills for several months.

 

I assume that HMRC have a serious hate of people living on small private pensions

and attack them as much as possible.

I always assumed that working full time for decades, paying loads of tax and national insurance, not claiming benefits and living on a private pension would put me in the Governments good books, but obviously not!

I have bought my house outright so I don't claim any housing benefit but I seem to be treated like trash by the HMRC and the Government.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, it is your pension provider that deducts the tax, not HMRC. Sometimes they can do this incorrectly.

 

What is your tax code for the pension you have paid tax on?

 

252T is the tax code for the pension I have been taxed on. The pension is £2576 per year. OK I assume I am over the tax threshold and should be taxed. However my total pensions are less than the normal tax threshold. HMRC know this so they are deliberately punishing poor people. This pension is a civil service pension and HMRC are civil service therefore my pension provider can't get it wrong as they are both the same thing.

They are both the civil service.......or are they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil service is more than just HMRC but either way they are the same as any other employer/pension provider.

 

Look there is no need to go on a rant. It is easily fixed and not the end of the world. Mistakes happen. No one is out to get you. They don't have a list of people who they think "let's go and wind them up"

 

Your personal allowance on that pension is too low. The personal allowance on that code is £2520, you earned £2570 so tax would automatically be deducted.

 

By my calculation you would pay £9.60 in tax on that code.

 

Is your other code 692L or something similar? This would make a personal allowance of £6920 to take you to a total allowance of £9440.

 

Call HMRC, ask for a rebate for 13/14 and ask for your tax codes to be split more evenly between each pension. Personal allowance is £10,000 this year so ask for a £7000/£3000 split if the amounts are likely to be the same again.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Civil service is more than just HMRC but either way they are the same as any other employer/pension provider.

 

Look there is no need to go on a rant. It is easily fixed and not the end of the world. Mistakes happen. No one is out to get you. They don't have a list of people who they think "let's go and wind them up"

 

Your personal allowance on that pension is too low. The personal allowance on that code is £2520, you earned £2570 so tax would automatically be deducted.

 

By my calculation you would pay £9.60 in tax on that code.

 

Is your other code 692L or something similar? This would make a personal allowance of £6920 to take you to a total allowance of £9440.

 

Call HMRC, ask for a rebate for 13/14 and ask for your tax codes to be split more evenly between each pension. Personal allowance is £10,000 this year so ask for a £7000/£3000 split if the amounts are likely to be the same again.

 

HMRC are fully aware of my two pensions that don't add up to the income tax thresold of £9440. Therefore they are obviously punishing poor people in order to protect bankers earning billions of pounds and avoiding tax. I cannot understand why I should contact HMRC when they have proved that they are hell bent on taxing poor people. They would obviously ignore me and probably take all my pension in tax. Please learn to understand that Tories hate people who aren't worth billions of pounds. They class ordinary house owning people as worhhless brain dead skum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think "IF" you follow advice from "blondebubbles" Post #4. (Good advice)

You will end up with a rebate. ....

Up to you. It's your money !!! your call.

Ignore advice if you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot understand why I should contact HMRC when they have proved that they are hell bent on taxing poor people.

 

In which case the answer is to do nothing and leave things as they are.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC are fully aware of my two pensions that don't add up to the income tax thresold of £9440. Therefore they are obviously punishing poor people in order to protect bankers earning billions of pounds and avoiding tax. I cannot understand why I should contact HMRC when they have proved that they are hell bent on taxing poor people. They would obviously ignore me and probably take all my pension in tax. Please learn to understand that Tories hate people who aren't worth billions of pounds. They class ordinary house owning people as worhhless brain dead skum.

 

Stop wasting peoples time asking for help you have no intention of taking. There is no need to be rude to the people on here.

 

At no point have I denied that they know you have 2 pensions. Obviously they know because they have separated your personal allowance between the two, it's just too low in one and too high in the other. It is easily resolved but if you don't want to bother then go moan about it to someone who cares, not on here.

 

Don't call them if you don't want to. It's up to you. It will automatically be reconciled in the next few months anyways.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC frequently get it wrong when someone has more than one pension, especially when the person is not working. That's why you have to be proactive by checking everything and querying anything incorrect. At the end of the tax year, your pension providers will have provided you with P60s setting out your total pension before tax, and the amount of tax deducted. Gather them all together for each year you have paid to much tax, send copies in with a covering letter ( by recorded delivery) and it will be sorted for you.

 

It may also be a good idea to call them first, politely explain their mistake, and even if they say they'll sort it, still write also so you have a paper trail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop wasting peoples time asking for help you have no intention of taking. There is no need to be rude to the people on here.

 

At no point have I denied that they know you have 2 pensions. Obviously they know because they have separated your personal allowance between the two, it's just too low in one and too high in the other. It is easily resolved but if you don't want to bother then go moan about it to someone who cares, not on here.

 

Don't call them if you don't want to. It's up to you. It will automatically be reconciled in the next few months anyways.

 

Who exactly have I been rude to? Please post a list of members I have been personally rude to. You have accused me of being a time waster, how rude is that?

I haven't accused anyone on this group of anything. However, if you know otherwise please provide evidence to support your accusation.

I can't see why I should inform HMRC of their mistakes. Surely it's their job not to make mistakes and not expect private pensioners to put them right. You seem to think that it's up to me to tell HMRC how to do their jobs properly. Well I think it's up to them to become competent at doing their jobs and NOT up to me to help them become competent. 18 years ago when I was working with digital radio design I didn't need to contact HMRC to make me competent in my complex job. Therefore why do I have to contact HMRC to make them competent in a simple job that only requires simple arithmetic? I was using calculus, boolean algebra and complex analysis with my job and you accuse me of being a time waster?

Cheers mate, thanks a lot, have a nice day. I assume your HND pass grade is better then mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just received an email with the posters response to my post at #12. For some reason its not on the forum yet. However its just the usual rant and basically, why should he contact them as their to thick to add up and you can't educate pork (his words not mine).

 

Although I have never worked in this general area, I've successfully helped my partner on more that one ocassion with tax mistakes and I've helped friends and relatives also. In all this time I've never seen anyone make the ridiculous stand the poster is making. I'm beginning to think its a wind up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has run its course I think.

 

The OP has been given choices, a) contact HMRC and get things resolved or b) do nothing and leave things as they are.

 

It is up to the OP now as to which route they take.

 

Thread closed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...