Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tax credit compliance interview..


pickles2k

Recommended Posts

I’ve seen a few threads on this already and unfortunately I’m in a similar situation through my own idiocy

and stupidity, 

 

I received a letter asking me to attend a telephone interview and provide statements for “ may to august 2020 “as they have information to believe “mr x” is living at the address... the interview is next week

 

Every single document they have asked for is in his name, I feel so stupid for this I was going to ring up and Cancel my award but with the pandemic and worry over income I made the awful mistake of not doing so, 

 

unfortunatey for various mental health, personal reasons i have also been claiming before this period, our relationship hasn’t been stable but we have always remained friends since we had a child together in 2015, I’m petrified they are going to ask to go back that far and the bill is going to be awful, 

 

I want to just ring up and own up to my partner living here during those dates but I want to know if they are then going to go digging for anything previous to that? 
 

what I’ve done is wrong and awful and I want to own up, but I’m so scared and nervous that if I own up to the previous few years too my bill will be so high and I will go to prison , what’s worse is that my partner doesn’t know I’m still claiming he told me ages ago to stop but life just got on top of me and I suffer with ptsd and anxiety and one thing led to another  putting it off

 

i won’t be entitled to any award

as my partner now earns above the threshold for this

 

do I just stick to owning up about the dates they ask or do I tell

them about the previous years claims by telling them the exact date he moved in

 

to compile the misery on this we decided to make a proper go of it and got engaged in January this year so it’s just another thing that they will find if they dig enough as the venue is now booked for 2022

 

im so ashamed and embarrassed by my actions i feel like there is no way up for air from all this and I don’t know which way is the best route to take, why oh why didn’t I cancel it when intended too earlier this year

 

i should add this is for claiming working tax credits, I was a bit stupid, uneducated and naive in the beginning thinking that just being in a relationship with someone doesn’t make them have to “keep” you and as I was working presumed I was still entitled, trying to keep my own finances and independence

 

Edited by pickles2k
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just answer honesty what they ask.

 

there are no threads here where anything nasty has ever happened

lots of like threads worthy of a read

but you'll see some unnecessarily worry and worry for no real reason

 

we often see people fed by other like worry merchants where neither have a real clue of what they are stating most is BS

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

Just answer honesty what they ask.

 

there are no threads here where anything nasty has ever happened

lots of like threads worthy of a read

but you'll see some unnecessarily worry and worry for no real reason

 

we often see people fed by other like worry merchants where neither have a real clue of what they are stating most is BS

 

 

Thank you, so you think if they ask when he moved in I should state for example, “2017” even though they are only wanting may - august this year?

 

i don’t mean to come across as having no remorse I genuinely want to repay what they ask but I’m so worried about what that figure could end up being if I give away more than they are after

 

thanks so much for your reply

 

also, could someone please explain what SAR is and if I should do it and if it is looked at negatively?

Edited by pickles2k
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you honeybee, I’m so anxious and petrified of the outcome of giving them further dates than they have mentioned that could lead to me getting prosecuted, I’ve been such an idiot,

 

should my partner also do a sar request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be anxious, you aren't an idiot. If you have a read around our forum on compliance interviews nobody has got into serious trouble.

 

People who know more than me about this will comment but I'm not sure if it's worth both of you making SAR requests because I'd think the information would be the same.

 

The thing is to tell the truth, sound apologetic and they should believe you. Normally in overclaimed benefits, if there are any, you would be asked to repay them at an affordable rate.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stresshead, apologies for follow ups, 

so did you tell them about all the dates but they only wanted that specific date period back? 

if no, was there any other dates that they maybe should have known about?

Thanks waffle dog, although it’s done my anxiety no good at all,

can they ask for child tax benefit back too? 

im sat punching numbers and genuinely worried in an absolute worst case scenario without believing me and without me being able to prove bills as they are all in his name, this could go back as much as 4 years, that could be nearly 40k 

my partner will likely leave me, I’m petrified of prison, I just don’t know how i let it get this far

now I’ve actually spent time to understand my stupidly mine is linked to working tax credit and child tax credit, I legitimately claimed it for years as a single parent and through past abusive relationships

my ptsd I fell in a trap of wanting to maintain my own financial independence, last year I wanted to cancel and my anxiety about doing it crippled me, 

if they want the entire 4 years for both my bill could genuinely be about 40k , if I get a criminal record I lose my job,

I’ve just been so stupid , can’t eat, sleep, can’t even look anyone in the eyes 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi waffle, I’m sorry to once again come back with another question but when you say you told them you moved in 2016, did you blurt out your dishonesty from the get go, saying I’m sorry inlied etc Or did you just answer the questions honestly

as if you didn’t realise you were making such a huge mistake?? 
 

as you can see my anxiety with this has my brain doing 1000 miles per hour,

I just keep thinking about how I can get them to agree for me to repay without looking at jail time or a criminal record

Link to post
Share on other sites

She just said that they are sorting out my claim because I didn’t renewal and that to do that she has to take details about my single claim, and then I just blurted out that I want to be honest from the start and I made a huge mistake. She was lovely. Everyone Iv spoken to has been tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pickles2k said:

jail time or a criminal record

 

which you will never suffer.

 

as above honesty is the best policy... 

 

Should you be asked a question that you intentionally lie upon, as has already been carefully explained here and in all these threads by everyone thats posted in this one, frightening each other to death, you must be mindful of the potential consequences now and p'haps later.

 

you should also never assume simply because bod on the phone says you must pay xyz, that you must.

an sar putting them to strict proof that can PROVE they hold the data is always a good idea.

 

numerous times in the past we have seen very large sums demanded, but later findout that it is simply a 'note' by an operator in your file who has long since moved on with no actual data to back up the claims made.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again DX,

 

so in essence what you are saying as being honest in the review saying my oh has been here 4 years and Owning up is one thing, but then they have to prove via a sar that they have proof or evidence of this to back up that I A. Haven’t told

them previous and B. That he was living here all that time,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I agree waffle I will be as open and honest and apologetic as I can I just meant if it got official, I’m assuming it’s only recorded when it’s an interview under caution? Just a review call isn’t evidence was my understanding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s how im Planning on starting it but my mind going into overdrive, I’m not going to be able to produce the stuff they are asking for and they are absolutely going to ask me if the person on the letter lives here,

 

yes he does, then when my OH moved in, well That was 4 years ago, so it’s either lie to keep it at those dates and hope or tell the truth and drop myself in further in it , I’m so anxious I just want to get it all out in the open but the financial burden is also going to cripple me

 

i appreciate all the help

you have all given me though , I’m taking every bit of it on board

Link to post
Share on other sites

these chaps are far greater at answering what sort of stuff is asked

but i suspect they only ask WAS your OH living for that year, not when he actually moved in

 

and don't forget, other than your 'confession' they have to have had some suspicion it was happening so their evidence existing via sar is critical to them proving things.

 

they are only asking about xxx tax years so only answer what is asked.

if they ask about other times, just say its too far back to remember clearly as the relationship or WHY was very on off etc etc 

cast doubt , make them prove it.

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wish you would keep to your OWN THREAD.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

numerous posts from all over hi-jacking other peoples threads moved to here..YOUR thread.

stay here now PLEASE..

 

yours is not the next move 

 

1 hour ago, pickles2k said:

any ideas on what I should do in this instance??

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...