Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit Claimform - OHs Halifax OD - want to defend mostly penalty charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well if your name is not on the claim form as a defendant....makes no difference.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner has received a letter from the court today, with a new hearing date (in 3 weeks) and I have been added.

 

Please help, what is our next step now?

 

 

They still haven't complied fully with the SAR,

so I need to get that in a defence

and also need to make it clear how much of this debt is penalty charges.

 

Do we send in separate defences, or a joint one?

 

Also,

can we make some kind of counter claim for the penalty charges on this account?

 

 

My partner has done so once before in the past, but about ten years ago and more have been added since.

 

Sorry for millions of questions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Define how you have been added......perhaps scan the letter or type out verbatim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner has received a 'notice of claimant application' and an application notice,

which reads at no.3

 

 

What order are you making and why?

"An order under CPR 19.2 that 'me' be added as a party to these proceedings as the joint account holder of the overdraft debt

which is subject to these proceedings because it is desirable to add 'me' so that the court can resolve all the matters in dispute in the proceedings".

 

He has also received a draft order which states:- upon hearing the solicitor for the claimant, the defendant and 'me'

IT IS ORdERED THAT

1. 'Me be added as co-defendant

2. The claimant be permitted to file and serve an amended claim form, and particulars of claim

3. No order as to cost

 

Attached is also a witness statement and

the statements,

template default.

notice and

screen shot,

plus notice of assignment letters,

 

 

which were the only thingss sent in response to the SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so the hearing is to review the above application and get permission to add you and if so they will then serve an amended claim which will contain you as joint defendant....why and what they have to gain is unsure.

 

Could you possibly post up or type out verbatim their attached WS jan?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I am the in house solicitor in the employ of the 1st credit limited and i have conduct of this matter on the claimants behalf. i make this statement on behalf of the claimant and i am authorised by it to make this statement and the contents of this statement are true to the best of my knowledge information and belief unless otherwise stated in which case i believe them to be true.

 

2. There is now produced and shown to me in exhibit 'LC1' various copy documents to which I shall refer by page number.

 

3. i make this statement in support of the claimants application to add 'me' as a party to these proceedings pursuant to CPR 19.2(2) (a) and (b).

 

Background

 

4. the claimant is in the business of purchasing consumer debt portfolios. it utilises telephone and letter communication to pursue a claim against the principal account holder on the basis that liability is joint and several.

 

5. The claimants claim is for monies due and owing together with costs and interest arising from a Halifax overdraft facility in respect of account blaa blaa blaa

 

6. A copy of the statements of account dated blaa blaa is attached at pages 1 to 14. The statements show that the account was held in the name of the defendant the new party. At page 12 the balance of that account is the same as the debt.

 

7. On 24.4.10 a default notice was issued by the original creditor. A copy of the default notice entry is at page 15. A copy of the default letter template issued at the time is at pages 16 to 17.

 

Assignment

 

8. On 18.1.13 the original creditor assigned the debt to the claimant. The notice of assignment to the new party dated 4.9.14 is at page 18. An introductory letter of the same date is at pages 19 to 20.

 

9. On 9.9.14 the claimant wrote to the new party confirming the details of the debt and enclosing its supporting documentation (pages 21 to 22). it also enclosed details of the claim which included the wording of the claim form and particulars of claim as submitted electronically to the court for issue because the claim is not sent a copy of the sealed claim form once issued. The new party was put on notice that if she did not respond by 16.9.14 that the claimant intended to make an application to add her as a party to these proceedings. The claimant did not receive a reply from the new party.

 

10. Given the above it is evident that there is an issue involving the new party and the defendant which is connected to the matter in dispute in these proceedings. it is also desirable to add the new party so the the court can resolve that issue and all the matters in dispute.

 

Summary

 

11. In summary i contend that in accordance with CPR 19.2(2) (a) and (b) the claimant requests that the claimant be permitted to serve an amended claim form and particulars of claim on the new with her dtails. i respectully request that the court make an order adding the new party to these proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I still ask and the DJ will probably ask the same why do they want to add you? The debt is joint and several...so they can go after either party with a joint claim or individual claims...in the case of a joint one both of you will get a CCJs should you lose so I can only guess that it is for personal reasons that they wish to add you and attack and destroy your credit worthiness.

 

You can submit your own WS in objection now and reasons as to why the application should be denied (you was removed from the agreement? why was you not on the initial claim? etc etc)this must be filed and served not less than 7 days before this application hearing hearing.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness Statement..........jan just before you start one question........

 

Do you own your own property...is it joint mortgage?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:madgrin: Thats why they want to add you as a defendant then they can get a full charging order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just going through all stuff and getting my head round it properly!

 

We have 3 hearing dates, what is the point in that? One is to add me, but the other two appear to be for the same thing. I presume we have to attend each one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure do...its imperative......just concentrate on stopping them adding you and explain the reasons why (as per above) .Once that is dealt with just proceed as normal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No makes no odds which name they use both satisfy legal requirements.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that's your defence then yes

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for millions of questions, but also as well as them not complying with SAR, could I (or maybe my partner) threaten to claim back all the charges with interest? And could this be done as a counterclaim, or a would it need to be separate? I reckon there must be at least £300 of charges that we could claim, but that's not including the £800 of charges included in this claim (which obviously haven't been paid)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Counter claims/Part 20 claims must be submitted with the defence......otherwise you must request the courts permission and make application (with fee) to submit said application.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

With hearing on Notice £155 without hearing £55

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...