Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Welcome Finance PPI Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My father took out a loan from Welcome Finance 6/7 years ago and then renewed it half way through as he needed more money.

 

He has since paid off all of the amount and completed the agreement.

 

He remembers that he had PPI on the loan,

 

he never claimed on it though.

 

How do we go on about re-claiming the mis-sold PPI?

 

We can't find the agreement at the moment and Welcome Finance have closed down.

 

Should we go through a claims management company?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

who?

 

no you don't lose upto 50% of your money thru a CMC

 

they have no more clout than you.

 

sent welcome an SAR

 

they are still doing them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who?

 

no you don't lose upto 50% of your money thru a CMC

 

they have no more clout than you.

 

sent welcome an SAR

 

they are still doing them

 

dx

Thank you, I'll get the SAR sent out on Monday! & Is it okay to leave the agreement number part blank as we don't know this? & should my father sign the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

makes no odds

you still go thru welcome

 

their staff are operating under FSCS guidelines now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

makes no odds

you still go thru welcome

 

their staff are operating under FSCS guidelines now

 

dx

 

Thank you, I'll be needing step by step help in reclaiming this PPI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of threads here to follow

 

and there are links below my post too.

link 1 is best

 

have a read around too

just shout you need any help.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of threads here to follow

 

and there are links below my post too.

link 1 is best

 

have a read around too

just shout you need any help.

 

I have found the credit agreement and it shows the breakdown of the PPI:

 

"Payment Protection

Policy in terms of months: 36

Price inc IPT: £673.02

Interest: £478.53

Total payable: £1151.56

Monthly payment: £31.99"

The loan was for £2000

In the end it says:

" Monthly payments: £95.06

Acceptance fee: £3.56

Insurance: £31.99

Total per month: £130.61"

 

Which SAR do I send them?

How much will I get back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found the credit agreement and it shows the breakdown of the PPI:

 

"Payment Protection

Policy in terms of months: 36

Price inc IPT: £673.02

Interest: £478.53

Total payable: £1151.56

Monthly payment: £31.99"

The loan was for £2000

In the end it says:

" Monthly payments: £95.06

Acceptance fee: £3.56

Insurance: £31.99

Total per month: £130.61"

 

Which SAR do I send them?

How much will I get back?

 

click the sar

 

as for what you should get back

 

with that info

 

link 1 below shows you how to do it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click the sar

 

as for what you should get back

 

with that info

 

link 1 below shows you how to do it

 

dx

 

Thank you so much dx100uk!

Would you advice I SAR them first or send in the template from link 1?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they loan ran its full course

 

then you should be able to do the whole thing without the statements.

 

however, pers with welcome finance

 

i'd recommend an sar just incase.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
well if they loan ran its full course

 

then you should be able to do the whole thing without the statements.

 

however, pers with welcome finance

 

i'd recommend an sar just incase.

 

dx

 

Thank you DX!

 

I sent the SAR to Welcome Finance on the 15 April & yesterday I received a bulk of paperwork through the post.

 

Account 1

opened around Jul 2007 which was for £2000 with PPI worth £673.02 (+ interest of £478.53 bringing the total to: £1151.56).

 

My father needed more money in Jan 2008 so he asked for another £2000 and

they closed this account to opened another one with which would cover the outstanding on this account

and give him another £2000.

Also on the day of closure of account 1 they refunded £439.59 (labelled as "Insurance Rebate").

 

Account 2 started in Jan 2008

this one had my mum's name added to the loan too.

PPI of £1448.24 ( + interest of £1029.70 bringing the total to: £2477.94)

and Lifecare24 was also added for £195 (+ interest of £138.72 bringing the total to: £333.72)

and as my Mum was added to the loan

 

they added Lifecare24 for my mother too for£195 (+ interest of £138.36 bringing the total to: £333.36).

 

All this from Account 2 equals £3144.99

 

In June 2008 the account was transferred to a new account, which from now we will call account 3.

 

Account 3 started in June 2008 ,

it looks like a simple transfer to a new account.

 

However a credit of £1040.97 was applied and labelled as "FSCS PPI REDRESS" in Jan 2012

which meant the loan came to an end 10 months earlier than original maturity.

 

Note:

The interest on loans was added on a monthly basis and none of the accounts 1&2 which had the products applied

ever reached their full term so would some interest be removed which reclaiming?

 

In account 1 only £673.02 was added at the start of the loan

then the interest of the loan and product combined was added each month.

 

Same with Account 2. & I got the interest figures from their own paper work which shows a price/product breakdown.

 

Reasons for miss-selling PPI are that:

My father was told that if he took out the PPI and Lifecare24 it would get the loan approved

and it would speed up the process as he had little credit history

& also it that it was compulsory with their loans.

 

What are my next steps?

What sort of amount will I get back?

 

Thank you in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow link 1 below

 

spreadsheet is at the end

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a payout from Welcome on an old loan with PPI. See http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?415458-Welcome-PPI-claim-pre-2005-***-SUCCESS-***(2-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Although I sent in a spreadsheet detailing how I worked it all out, they wanted me to complete a FOS questionnaire and they then did their own calculations to be able to send me an offer letter. It came out reasonably close to what I had worked out, if anything a little higher, so we accepted and the money had gone into the bank this morning :)

 

As your claim involves an earlier FSCS refund it's a bit more complicated. I would be tempted to get them to do all the legwork and make an offer. By all means do your own spreadsheet to see if their eventual offer comes close to what you think it should be. From my experience, they ignored any spreadsheet I sent in...

 

You need to make the claim on PPI only - anything like Lifecare or claiming any charges they added need to be done as separate claims.

 

You can get a copy of the FOS Questionnaire here - http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/contact/PPI-your-case.html - go down to the section "how do I complain about PPI mis-selling?" and click on the Word or PDF document to download it. Fill it in and send it with your claim letter.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi can anyone tell my how i can claim ppi without any paperwork and i know i had ppi with my first mortgage but cannot remember the obscure building society i used in was in 1988. I also know i had an endowment with the legal and general around the same time but i do not have any paperwork to verify this thanks maggie

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 3 send an sar.

 

and start a new thread of your own

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...