Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just noted that in Section 4 of the ebay powered by packlink T&Cs, there is a link to a list of webpages for each Transport Agency including Evri. When clicking on this, it redirects to Evri's send terms and conditions, which says: Our contract with you When you send a parcel with us, you enter into a contract with Evri. These terms and conditions set out your responsibilities and our service commitments to you, along with some legal bits about our liability and how you will be compensated in the unlikely event that things go wrong. Link to Evri send T&Cs: https://www.evri.com/terms-and-conditions the extract highlighted in bold above is pertinent as in Evri's own T&Cs, by sending a parcel with Evri, the sender and Evri have entered into a contract. Screenshot of the above extract attached. Screenshot_20240524_030834_Chrome.pdf
    • Hi, Evri provided a copy of the Ebay powered by Packlink T&Cs in their WS/Court bundle - this is already uploaded in post #246 yesterday. I copy and pasted the actual wording of clauses 3b and 3c from there into my post #246. see points 3b and 3c in Section 3 (General) through this link to the T&Cs:  https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360004768420-eBay-Delivery-Powered-by-Packlink-Terms-and-Conditions#h_01HFXQJBTB441YZGPB7CQP9KFV Screenshot attached below. I cant answer why its not been picked up before. In my opinion, this is called Ebay powered by packlink T&Cs so it could be intepreted to mean Ebay and Packlink's T&Cs rather than Packlink and the delivery couriers T&Cs. In regards to seeing Evri/Packlink's entire contract in original form, in my WS, Evri has been invited to provide this. They have not provided the contract in their WS/court bundle. Screenshot_20240524_024259_Chrome.pdf
    • yes, and he has since emailed them to say he wants it done with a hearing
    • Do I take it that you had already informed the court that you wanted the case settled on the papers rather than by way of a hearing before you came here and told us?
    • This is a very important find. I don't understand why nobody has picked up on this before. It's a shame that you have only just found it but please will you get a screenshot and also give us a link to the page which contains this and if possible a link to the actual passage. This makes a huge difference because if this is right that the third party actually has a direct contract with the courier company then they can rely on their consumer rights rather than commercial rights. Also as you seem to have pointed out, even if  their commercial contract does exclude third-party rights, the clause that you have found on the eBay site directly contradicts that And this should be pointed out to the judge.  Please will you screenshot the passage. Give us a link and then stand by for a response later on today. We will have to send this additional piece of information to the court and don't worry we will manage to do it before the 4:00 pm deadline. And in any event, you will certainly want to see the entire contract in original form and receive clarification as to when their third-party exclusion close was included in it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Williams/Hoist/Robinson Way/Drysden Fairfax debt. Help Needed


Morr
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry, I have more questions, on the statement where is lists all the payments and charges it has a line where it adds the interest each month, but the amount changes each time.

 

It starts off saying 1.89 pomp charged (what does pomp mean?!) but each month it goes up about, until the last month on the statement where it is 15.11pomp charged. Is this something to do with the APR? if so how do i implement this onto the spreadsheet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no obligation under SAR to supply a copy of the agreement, this is dealt with s.77-79 CCA 1974 (as amended).

 

 

No CCA = unen. via court, debt still exists and is collectable, action could be taken if the agreement is found.

 

 

Stat Barred in England and Wale = 6 clear years no payments or unequivocal written acknowledgment of the debt.

If the above applies to you then send SB letter from CAG library by signed for post, check delivery.

 

 

 

Both these statements are incorrect

 

A SDAR will indeed turn up a copy of the agreement if you state that you require one, it is personal data if they have it they cannot refuse to supply it.

 

A copy request under the consumer credit act has nothing to do with an SAR they are different pieces of legislature the requirement to produce a copy under thee CCA has absolutely nothing to do with the requirements of the data protection act.

 

I personally have gained a bout half a dozen agreements through an SAR for my own sake and know many others who have done the same when claiming PPI and agreement details for claims regarding charges. Anyway give it a try and let us know who is correct.

 

Sb applies from when the agreement is terminated via a term in the agreement and the SB date is reset by a payment thereafter, so if the agreement had been terminated you would be safe in presuming it was the last payment date if not it would be the time when the agreements defaulted and terminated.

 

D

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

hairs and splitting

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hairs and splitting

 

dx

 

Is being wrongly advised that sending a SAR will not produce an agreement. when the fact is that it most definitely will. Does the site team have so little regard for the truth regarding the advice given on here that they consider accurate advice Hair splitting ?

Hardly. The OP requires factual help I presume, otherwise everything said on here is hair splitting.

 

Is being advised that an account is statute barred when it may well be, hair splitting?

Perhaps your priorities need examining and the allegiance to those who come on here for help needs to be placed above the toadying to the egos of someone who frankly has little or no business giving advice at all, and continues to pretend that they have.

Edited by Dodgeball
spell :)

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent them a CCA request in 2010, but they sent me back a blank CCA and said i would have signed something like this (but it wasn't filled out).

 

I've added all of the charges to he spreadsheet, and they come to £444. But if I haven't PAID them, can I reclaim them and charge interest?

 

Still just wondering if the end date on the spreadsheet is today's date, or the date of the last charge, and what the APR is. If i can't see it I will base is on 29.9%.

 

This was a Nat Close Acc. thanks everyone!

 

Yes you can reclaim them.If successful they will be reversed from your account.

 

The "Claim To" date on your spreadsheet should be the date they stopped charging interest (see below)

 

 

Sorry, I have more questions, on the statement where is lists all the payments and charges it has a line where it adds the interest each month, but the amount changes each time.

 

It starts off saying 1.89 pomp charged (what does pomp mean?!) but each month it goes up about, until the last month on the statement where it is 15.11pomp charged. Is this something to do with the APR? if so how do i implement this onto the spreadsheet?

 

POMP is their "Peace of Mind Protection". In other words it is PPI and can be reclaimed of mis-sold. If you didn't want it, agree to it and it was put on there without your knowledge then it should be reclaimed.

 

Do your statements show any actual interest being charged to the account?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, thanks for the advice.

 

In answer to some questions,

 

going through the SAR on at least 5 occasions it says no insurance, or NA next to insurance, or 0.0 paid in insurance.

 

BUT on the complete summary it says interest charged and pomp.

 

There is definitely interest charged.

 

Would it be helpful if I uploaded the statement to see if you can make sense of it?

 

I want to get the ball rolling on this as soon as I can.

 

Lastly, d

oes anyone know what APR I put in the CIS spreadsheet to work it out?

 

I can find no record of an APR on the SAR (to be fair most of the SAR is blank pages saying no details found,

they don't seem to have a lot of information about this account at all!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help after I've attached my statement above?! I'd really like to get some action taken this week, but I'm really at a loss of even where to start! Thanks everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks to me like they are charging around 2.53% per month on the outstanding balance which equates to an APR of some 35%.

 

If you look at the last entry on the statement the interest is £15.11 on the previous balance of £597.74.

 

15.11 / 597.74 x 100 = 2.53%

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, great maths! In that case, my sheet says total charges £444, compound interest £158.91, so total is £602.91.

 

Where do I go from here?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that the account was defaulted. Make sure your "Claim To" date on the spreadsheet is set to the date that they stopped charging interest.

 

You would then send them a preliminary letter requiring a refund. They will almost certainly refuse.

 

You would then send them a "Letter Before Action" and if the still refuse then you would issue in court.

 

There is a fairly recent thread around here where charges were successfully reclaimed on a catalogue account. Might be worth looking for that and having a read.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay great.

 

 

What risk do I take by doing that.

 

 

Can they still pursue court action if I have asked them for charges back?

 

 

I'm scared if I get their back up by asking for them back, they will go all guns blazing!

 

Can you direct me to the exact letter to use/ the letters I keep finding are to do with credit cards or PPI charges.

 

 

 

 

Thanks so much for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no guarantees as to what they will do.

 

How does your spreadsheet figure compare to the amount they are chasing?

 

The credit card letter is the closest you will find which you can the adapt to your particular case.

 

When you have a draft, post it up here and we can get it looked at.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh okay, great! So they say I owe £612 (ordered goods worth £67, and paid over £150). So there wouldn't really be anything left to pay on the account.

 

I will dig out the letter and post it up once i have amended it. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question: When it says in the letter

 

' I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.'

 

Is this talking about the CCA? As there is no CCA in the SAR they sent me, does this statement matter?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you incthe cca statement

 

also unless you are going to do court

I would remove that line

 

and change it to

 

unless I get a favourable response in relation to my complaint

within 8 weeks I will take the matter up with the relevant authorities

regarding this matter.

 

 

[pers i'd remove any ref to 14 days

they have 8 weeks

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi All, It's been a long time since I updated!

 

 

since my last post,

I have received a few letters from Robinson Way saying their client is looking into the matter

and they will get back to me, but I've had no direct response from JD Williams

(who I had addressed the complaint too and the claim for charges as above).

 

 

However, yesterday I received a debt collection letter from Robinson Way.

Saying I have repeatedly failed to pay the account (the usual DCA letter they were sending before).

 

So what has happened?

 

 

I haven't yet heard back from the Creditors about my complaint, so how come they are suddenly resuming collection activity.

Are they allowed to resume collection activity whilst the debt is being disputed?

 

 

Any suggestions as to what I do next?

 

 

Hold tight and let the letters come, or write back to Robinson Way saying that this matter is still in dispute?

 

 

Thanks all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the reclaiming outweighs the owing.

 

 

your choice.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

To clarify,

 

 

I don't actually want any money from them via the reclaim,

 

 

I just want them to agree the debt is settled to be honest and stop pursuing it (I realise this might be high hopes on my part!).

 

 

As they are resuming debt collection activity,

 

 

I wonder if I should write back and say that this matter is being disputed with the original creditor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can but no guarantees

 

 

inc you reclaim letter and spread.

state you consider the matter closed.

 

 

don't forget DCA's are NOT BAIIFFS

they have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...