Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Receiving benefits but want to go self employed


WDeranged
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3709 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been receiving Incapacity and Housing benefit for quite a few years due to various mental health issues but now I have a decent chance to start up a home business repairing computers and I'm worried about losing all my support if things don't work out.

 

I've spoken to Incapacity Benefits and they told me I can apply for Permitted Work which would allow me to work up to 16 hours a week and earn £101, anything over £101 will be deducted from my benefits. I also got in touch with Housing Benefit and they told me that as long as I sign up for Permitted Work and keep them updated with my monthly earnings I would be able to keep a certain amount of the benefit. If the system really works this way then I think I could make a go of this, I'm just staggeringly anxious about it all :!:

 

I still need to ring the Tax Office to ask for advice, I'm utterly clueless about tax but I'm told that at this level I won't have to pay anything and I will need to apply for Self Certification.

 

If anyone has been through this sort of thing I'd greatly appreciate some guidance, I feel a bit like I'm jumping without a parachute.

Edited by WDeranged
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert in this area, hopefully someone with knowledge of it will come and comment.

 

What I can say is that some who have gone down the road of self employment have regretted it, as unless there is a guaranteed regular income it can all go wrong. some on JSA have found this to be the case as there is very little support once you got it alone. Having mental health issues myself (bipolar) for me the stress of not earning some weeks would send me on a downward spiral. I guess it depends on how much work and how often you believe it will be there is the main issue. The permitted work would be the safest way to try it out I guess? at least that way if it doesn't pan out then you haven't lost your entitlement.

 

Good luck in whatever you decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm definitely scared of jumping without a net, if I were to suddenly drop all my benefits I wouldn't be able to keep even a small home business going so it'd be a huge relief if I could keep at least some of it while testing the water.

 

Thanks for the reply, I'll keep my fingers crossed that someone with experience in these matters comes along :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi OP.

 

Are you certain that you are still on Incapacity Benefit. I ask because all IB claimants are being re-assessed for migration over to Employment Support Allowance (ESA). The migration was due to be concluded by March 2014, but the DWP and ATOS are so inept that the end date may have been extended.

 

Anyhow, as far as I am aware there is a DWP initiative which allows claimants on long term ESA or IB who wish to give self employment a try a grant of say £50 per week over what i recollect to be a 12 month period. Discuss it with a Jobcentre plus advisor. They are normally very very helpful and considerate. As a transition you may want to try permitted work, whilst keeping IB (or ESA) , and if all goes swimmingly well then you may wish to consider applying for the above referenced "self employment start up initiative".

 

The tax situation is in reality quite straightforward. If you can call into a CAB or a local tax office and obtain guidance.

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:WDeranged:

 

Permitted work whilst in receipt of incapacity benefit/employment n support allowance is very different to self employment from jobseekers. And yes, the system that's been described to you works. The only proviso that I'd suggest you look at; is whether the work you're intending to do conflicts with your eligibility for incapacity benefit, and in due course your eligibility for employment n support.

 

http://www.lancashirepolfed.org.uk/what/incapacity2.pdf

 

Housing benefit and council tax reduction aren't affected by permitted work, if you've completed a PW1 form. Available from your benefit delivery centre, it's one of Jobcentreplus simpler forms. You can try permitted work for up to a year without it affecting your existing entitlement to benefits, unless your award's topped up by income support.

 

A guide to permitted work from;

 

http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/work-people-living-disability-or-health-conditions

 

Sorry, I can't help with the tax query, but you're welcome to post in the HMRC sub forum.

 

Good luck, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might also look into the disabled element of Working Tax Credit.

 

Usually for a single person, you have to work at least 30 hrs pw to claim. If disabled, I think it's only 16 hrs pw.

 

As mentioned, there's an initiative for those on disability benefits to receive financial help (approx £50 pw for 1 year). Not sure, but you might be able to get both monies - enough to keep one afloat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Spot the Difference:

 

Whilst all the contributions to this thread are welcome, it's important to note differences between the myriad of Jobcentreplus schemes to help claimants move off income replacement benefits for disability and into employment.

 

The original enquirer is in receipt of incapacity benefit which means s/he can do some 'permitted work', without it affecting existing entitlement to benefits unless earnings are in excess of £100 ish per week. As can claimants in receipt of contributions flavoured or income flavoured employment n support, or severe disablement allowance. Claimants in receipt of income support on grounds of disability can do 'permitted work' but earnings in excess of £20 per week are counted as income.

 

The other schemes in this thread; working tax credits and (I presume) new enterprise allowance are considered to be in work benefits. Consequently, claims for income replacement benefits on grounds of disability have to be closed before they can be accessed.

 

https://www.gov.uk/new-enterprise-allowance

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/taxcredits/tc956.pdf

 

Margaret.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm self employed. It sucks to be honest lol I can't wait to find employed work. When Universal credit kicks in we need to be earning minimum wage based on 35 hours a week I think it is. That wont be happening for me. I can work til midnight & not touch minimum wage. It works for me at the moment due to tax credits, but as I say, once UC comes in, it'll be a non starter.

I miss the regular income as well. Some weeks I can make more than £100 but some weeks less. All my benefits are based on £100 a week (i'm not on any disability ones though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im currently self-employed and doing ok, but I waited a while before taking the plunge and aiming to be self employed permanantly, i.e going from contract to contract.

 

Clearly there is a risk and in theory you cant just sign on and claim JSA when things go slow, however you can end your self employed status and then sign on but it is a bit of a grey area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After claiming JSA for 10 months, I became self-employed and now have my own new small business. I work 7 days a week, sometimes 12 hours a day and I haven't been able to draw a wage since I started five months ago as my overheads exceed my weekly takings. I've now been forced to make a claim for WTC and if that's approved, my income will still be approximately £20 a week less than former JSA weekly payment. It's lamentable and so ironic.

 

 

And I thought work was meant to pay. If you're ever thinking of going self-employed, especially if you are in receipt of ESA or similar, and have disabilities ... please, please, please think twice. It's difficult enough when you're intelligent, credential, experienced, able-bodied and hard-working.

 

 

Although I love my new business with a passion and hated being on benefits, at least then I could eat regularly, buy food, cover basic bills and could afford to heat the house and have constant hot water. Those are all now luxuries I can ill afford. Now I have my self-respect but, sadly, that doesn't put food on the table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Still) Impecunious!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...