Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      Trying to find contact details for prime credit 5 S.a.r.l

      By dx100uk · Posted

      is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Restart
      Commercial business lease - Letter before Action - Negotiation not going well

      By Restart · Posted

      Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hikertrash
      MET CCTV PNC - Starbucks closed- Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

      By Hikertrash · Posted

      Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Mdg123
      Private parking charge from Euro Car Parks now with Debt Recovery Plus

      By Mdg123 · Posted

      Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Wilkins Chapman for Arrows. Claimform old MBNA card debt- Help

Buncrana

By Buncrana
in Financial Legal Issues

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted

HI Guys,

 

It's been a while, and I hope you are all well :D

 

Well the SAR has been delivered from MBNA, but no CCA.

 

There are charges on there, roughly £900's worth of them. No PPI, just charges.

 

So, still waiting for Wilkins Chapman to provide the correct, original CCA.

 

As per the charges, Mrs B still hasn't acknowledged the debt, so we can't claim them back. Yet. :)

 

With the SAR, is there anything that I should be looking for in particular?

 

Buncrana

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Fkofilee :D

 

The SAR shows spending, charges, cash withdrawals, phone conversations that she had with them, and it shows when they attempted to call her.

 

I can't be more thorough just now as I don't have it with me, at work unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites
fkofilee

fkofilee

Posted
Posted

Howdi

 

Okay that is fine. The SAR is primarily used to pull all the charges information.

 

Naturally you can't claim without admitting the debt. Remind me how close this is to being SB?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
HI Guys,

 

It's been a while, and I hope you are all well :D

 

Well the SAR has been delivered from MBNA, but no CCA.

 

There are charges on there, roughly £900's worth of them. No PPI, just charges.

 

So, still waiting for Wilkins Chapman to provide the correct, original CCA.

 

As per the charges, Mrs B still hasn't acknowledged the debt, so we can't claim them back. Yet. :)

 

With the SAR, is there anything that I should be looking for in particular?

 

Buncrana

 

 

 

Good morning Buncrana, you are well I trust?

 

 

I am not surprised that there was no CCA included the SAR data, it is not considered "personal data" and there is no obligation for a creditor to supply this other than under a CCA request made under Sections 77/78/79 of CCA 1974 (as amended).

 

 

Default date, is it correctly shown on CRA files? Is the amount claimed correct?,

How long ago was the CCA request sent to WC? if more than the 12+2 working days the debt is unenforceable until they do supply, a failure to comply letter could be sent.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Brig, I hope all is well with you and yours :D

 

Yes, apart from this lot, life is good :D

 

Default date is correct on her credit files, though she was paying through CCCS until October 2010. An error on her part, she didn't realise she hadn't cancelled the DD due to other things going on at the time, namely her fathers illness.

 

Will check when I get home, but I'm virtually certain that the timeframe has expired for compliance with the CCA request. I'm sure it was at least three weeks ago.

 

We haven't heard anything else via the court regarding this. WC did give a two day deadline for payment, which was very considerate of them :)

 

Will be home later this afternoon, will double check when the CCA request was sent off..

 

Buncrana :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
''Is the amount claimed correct?''

 

Ps, I seem to recall that there is a bit of a discrepancy in the amount, will check when I get home :)

Hi Buncrana,

 

 

Looking back CCA request sent around 2nd June '14?

 

 

If they have not written to say they need more time it's a fair bet they haven't got the CCA.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Brig,

 

 

I've had a look, but can't find the postal receipts, but it was around the 2nd June. I remember because the CCA they sent from the CPR request overlapped the CCA request I sent. Also, the SAR was sent off in the same post. SAR has arrived.

 

 

Now, the CCA they sent had been doctored and most certainly was not the original one signed by Mrs B, when I say doctored, I mean her address at the time has been removed and our current address has been inserted. WC could also say that they have already sent one out, but it is not the original. The one that they first sent out, has our current address on it. She was living around 60 odd miles away when she applied for this card. The SAR actually shows the correct address from that time and the first page of the CCA.

 

 

There is also a difference of almost £300 between the final amount owed to MBNA and the amount being claimed by WC, in WC's favour of course.

 

 

Charges amount to almost £700, not £900 as I stated earlier...

 

 

Hope that helps :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
Hi Brig,

 

 

I've had a look, but can't find the postal receipts, but it was around the 2nd June. I remember because the CCA they sent from the CPR request overlapped the CCA request I sent. Also, the SAR was sent off in the same post. SAR has arrived.

 

 

Now, the CCA they sent had been doctored and most certainly was not the original one signed by Mrs B, when I say doctored, I mean her address at the time has been removed and our current address has been inserted. WC could also say that they have already sent one out, but it is not the original. The one that they first sent out, has our current address on it. She was living around 60 odd miles away when she applied for this card. The SAR actually shows the correct address from that time and the first page of the CCA.

 

 

There is also a difference of almost £300 between the final amount owed to MBNA and the amount being claimed by WC, in WC's favour of course.

 

 

Charges amount to almost £700, not £900 as I stated earlier...

 

 

Hope that helps :)

 

 

 

Hi Buncrana,

 

 

One thing jumps out straight away, IF the is supposed to be a "reconstituted" agreement or a true copy of the original agreement it Must have the name and address that was current at the time the agreement was signed.

 

 

So reject the CCA that has been " doctored" as non compliant with the CCA request , but do not explain why.

 

 

Let's see how they respond to that.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hi Buncrana,

 

 

One thing jumps out straight away, IF the is supposed to be a "reconstituted" agreement or a true copy of the original agreement it Must have the name and address that was current at the time the agreement was signed.

 

 

So reject the CCA that has been " doctored" as non compliant with the CCA request , but do not explain why.

 

 

Let's see how they respond to that.

 

 

Thanks for that Brig, it most definitely isn't the original. Also, the pages go from, Front page of application form, usual details etc. Page 2 is Financial and related conditions. Page 3 shows ''2 of 7'' on the bottom of the page, and a different typeset from the first two. Page 4 shows ''4 of 7'' on the bottom of the page. Page 5 shows ''6 of 7'' on the bottom. Page 6 is blank.

 

 

So we have pages missing, new addresses inserted, and different typesets, all in the one CCA.

 

 

The NOA also has a paragraph stating ''We have already made arrangements with Wescot Credit Services to continue to manage your account and you should continue to direct all correspondence and payments'' to Wescot...

 

 

We have never had any dealings or correspondence from Wescot...

 

 

So, next step time.

 

 

They haven't responded within the 12+2 days for the CCA, though they could argue that they already sent one out.

 

 

Do I now respond to them and say that this is the wrong agreement?

 

 

Buncrana

 

 

Ps, are there any templates foir such??

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
Thanks for that Brig, it most definitely isn't the original. Also, the pages go from, Front page of application form, usual details etc. Page 2 is Financial and related conditions. Page 3 shows ''2 of 7'' on the bottom of the page, and a different typeset from the first two. Page 4 shows ''4 of 7'' on the bottom of the page. Page 5 shows ''6 of 7'' on the bottom. Page 6 is blank.

 

 

So we have pages missing, new addresses inserted, and different typesets, all in the one CCA.

 

 

The NOA also has a paragraph stating ''We have already made arrangements with Wescot Credit Services to continue to manage your account and you should continue to direct all correspondence and payments'' to Wescot...

 

 

We have never had any dealings or correspondence from Wescot...

 

 

So, next step time.

 

 

They haven't responded within the 12+2 days for the CCA, though they could argue that they already sent one out.

 

 

Do I now respond to them and say that this is the wrong agreement?

 

 

Buncrana

 

 

Ps, are there any templates foir such??

 

 

 

Only in my head.

Refs use theirs.

Sir/Madam,

 

 

I refer to the documents supplied in response to my request made under sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 (as amended), as you are no doubt aware these are not compliant with my request and are therefore rejected.

 

 

This matter remains in dispute and the alleged debt is unenforceable.

 

 

Recorded signed for post.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
Done Brig, what a guy :D

 

 

Will post that on Monday morning, recorded of course :D

Best wishes to you and Mrs B.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Guys,

 

 

WC have been back in contact. (Please see the attached).

 

 

As you can see, they are stating that the CCA provided is a true copy of the original.

 

 

And as previously stated on this thread, it very obviously isn't.

 

 

And it looks like they want us to do their job for them by letting them know why it isn't compliant with S77/78.

 

 

I have looked back through the CCA they sent out, just to clarify in my own mind, the errors contained in it. Pages out of sync, pages missing, wrong address etc.

 

 

I'm thinking of responding along the lines of:

 

 

Re your correspondence of...........

 

 

The CCA received from your company is non compliant. It is not my place to tell you why, you should know why yourselves.

 

 

I still do not acknowledge any debt to your company.

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Mrs B

 

 

Is this suffice, or do I need to add more?

 

 

I'm still very much a novice at this, and any help is very much appreciated :)

 

 

Hope you're all having a good day,

 

 

Buncrana P:)

 

Hi Andy,

 

 

I think I've done that right, if not, let me know and I'll try and amend it :)

 

 

So, if I read you correctly, just ignore until they decide what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Why respond ?

 

 

 

Hi Andy,

 

 

How are you :)

 

 

Very good question....

 

 

A defence was lodged via Northampton some time ago. If we don't respond to this latest letter from WC, what are the consequences?

 

 

And we have heard nothing back from the court since the defence was lodged, the one that you very kindly gave us :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted

Im fine thanks Buncrana and trust you are same.

 

You need to convert the above letter to PDF firstly to enable posters to read.

 

But irrespectively and can surmise the nonsense it contains...you are not at liberty to respond...you have submitted your defence...its now their move next.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
The Mould

The Mould

Posted
Posted

Yes, disregard their request for you to respond.

 

 

You have filed a Defence against the claim and you are not obligated to provide the Claimant with any explanation as regards your allegations on the agreement provided by him.

 

 

Raise your allegations against the agreement at the trial in your submissions (set out in your skeleton argument).

 

 

Kind regards

 

 

The Mould

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Yes, disregard their request for you to respond.

 

 

You have filed a Defence against the claim and you are not obligated to provide the Claimant with any explanation as regards your allegations on the agreement provided by him.

 

 

Raise your allegations against the agreement at the trial in your submissions (set out in your skeleton argument).

 

 

Kind regards

 

 

The Mould

 

 

Hi Mould,

 

 

I hope you are feeling better these days :)

 

 

Given what you've read so far, do you think this will go to court?

 

 

Buncrana :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted
Hi Andy,

 

 

I think I've done that right, if not, let me know and I'll try and amend it :)

 

 

So, if I read you correctly, just ignore until they decide what to do next?

Hi Buncrana , How are you??

 

 

My suggestion as reply to this is

 

 

Dear Cur or madman,

 

 

I am sure you are filly aware of the reasons why the document (s) supplied in response to my recent request made under sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 as amended.

 

 

Therefore I see no need for further correspondence.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted
Why respond ?

 

I can only reiterate and save you the bother...so you can sunbathe:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Buncrana

Buncrana

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hi Buncrana , How are you??

 

 

My suggestion as reply to this is

 

 

Dear Cur or madman,

 

 

I am sure you are filly aware of the reasons why the document (s) supplied in response to my recent request made under sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 as amended.

 

 

Therefore I see no need for further correspondence.

 

 

Hi Brig, we're both good thank you :D I hope you and yours are well :D

 

I can only reiterate and save you the bother...so you can sunbathe:-)

 

 

Are you spying on me Andy :D

 

 

It seems a pity not to get a bit of vitamin D on these fine days, especially with a load of night shifts coming up :D

 

 

As much as I'm tempted to send a ''GIRUY'' letter, I'll hold back until any court case...

 

 

Though here's hoping it won't go near a court :)

 

 

Time to get ready for work now, have a lovely evening folks, and thank you once again for all of your help, you guys are something else :D

 

 

All the best for now,

 

 

Buncrana :D

 

 

Ps, should they come calling again, I will of course let you know :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...