Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sokam vs AIB


sokam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My correspondence with AIB (Allied Irish Bank) are as follows:n

 

1. 10 Oct 06 - sent letter claiming £1,104.25

 

2. 14 Oct 06 - received response from bank basically refusing to pay

 

3. 16 Oct 06 - sent LBA. Got the following response from AIB (see full text below)

 

All my correspondence (Request for Payment & LBA) were sent to my branch and now they're suggesting I re-direct my query to their Head office.

 

My questions are:

 

1. Should I still go ahead and file my claim (court) or re-send the LBA again to the Head office as well?

 

2. If the response/suggestion is to go ahead with the claim do I 've to wait another 14 days or will it continue from the date I sent the intial LBA to my branch.

 

 

Thanks.

 

=====Response from AIB dated 24/10/06=======

 

We refer to your letter of 16 Oct 06 and your request for the refund of excess charges.

 

We would advise again that we are not currently in breach of any legislation. Under the terms of the banking code we are required to notify you of all charges and we have complied with this at all times. Our charges are freely available on the internet and they form part of the contract that was agreed with you when you opened the account with us.

 

It is your responsibilty to maintain your account either in credit or in line with any sanctioned facility. As you have not clearly done so, we are fully entitled to charge you for the time and effort required to manage your account.

 

We have no further comment to make regarding this claim. Should you still consider the decision to be unfair and wish to to take this matter further, your next port of call would be to either contact the Financial Ombudsman services ( details of which are included in the recent leaflet sent) or to contact our Head Office at the address detailed below.

 

Allied Irish Bank (GB)

Customer Care

Bankcentre

Belmont Road

Uxbridge

Middlesex

UB8 1SA

 

signed by the Operations Team Leader

For & on behalf of AIB Group (UK) plc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Received Acknowledgement of Service from AIB on 15 Nov 06 through their solicitors Karlakes Solicitors.

 

This morning - 24/11/06 I received their defence (see details below) and have requested I acknowledge safe receipt. Looking for some ideas as to how I should respond.

 

====Defence from AIB received from Karlakes Solicitors=====is as follows:

 

1. The Defence admits that at all material times the Claimant maintained a current account

 

number xxxxxxxxx at the the defendant's branch at XYZ Buildings, 12 Sweet Rd, Sometown (the

 

Account).

 

2. All fees and charges levied by the defendnt against the Account were on foot of the terms

 

and conditions which govern the agreement between the Defendant and the Claimant.

 

3. In the premises the Defendant denies that the amount claimed or any amount is due and

 

owning by the defendant to the Claimant.

 

Signed

 

David Yeates

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received Acknowledgement of Service from AIB on 15 Nov 06 through their solicitors Karlakes Solicitors.

 

This morning - 24/11/06 I received their defence (see details below) and have requested I acknowledge safe receipt. Looking for some ideas as to how I should respond.

 

====Defence from AIB received from Karlakes Solicitors=====is as follows:

 

1. The Defence admits that at all material times the Claimant maintained a current account

 

number xxxxxxxxx at the the defendant's branch at XYZ Buildings, 12 Sweet Rd, Sometown (the

 

Account).

 

2. All fees and charges levied by the defendnt against the Account were on foot of the terms

 

and conditions which govern the agreement between the Defendant and the Claimant.

 

3. In the premises the Defendant denies that the amount claimed or any amount is due and

 

owning by the defendant to the Claimant.

 

Signed

 

David Yeates

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last post moved here.......please keep your posts in your thread !!:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their defence is quite poor.

Sit tight and await the next moves.

If you need help with the allocation questionaire just ask.

I am sure from whats on the table now things are going pretty smooth.

If other posters are in the Oxford area......like he says here give eachother some support.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin3030 - Thanks for the advice. Yes I will need some help with the AQ when it arrives.

 

I phoned MCOL this AM and was told that my claim has been transferred to the Oxford County Court & that the AQ should arrive by tomorrow 30/11/06.

 

I keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received Acknowledgement of Service from AIB on 15 Nov 06 through their solicitors Karlakes Solicitors.

 

This morning - 24/11/06 I received their defence (see details below) and have requested I acknowledge safe receipt. Looking for some ideas as to how I should respond.

 

====Defence from AIB received from Karlakes Solicitors=====is as follows:

 

1. The Defence admits that at all material times the Claimant maintained a current account

 

number xxxxxxxxx at the the defendant's branch at XYZ Buildings, 12 Sweet Rd, Sometown (the

 

Account).

 

2. All fees and charges levied by the defendnt against the Account were on foot of the terms

 

and conditions which govern the agreement between the Defendant and the Claimant.

 

3. In the premises the Defendant denies that the amount claimed or any amount is due and

 

owning by the defendant to the Claimant.

 

Signed

 

David Yeates

 

Need some help. Karlakes Solicitors (acting for AIB) requested that I acknowledge receipt of their Defence. Should I respond and if yes what should I say in it.

 

Update: Received the Allocation Questionnaire for Oxford County Council should send a copy to the solicitors as well or just to the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi sokam

 

I know this is quite old but I was wondering how you got on? I have just posted a general query to see how anyone else got on and then I found you!! There doesn't seem to be many/any who have tried to claim from AIB which is suprising as I think their charges and communication is appalling. (Am I allowed to say that??) Just wondering how it all went.

 

dappy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...