Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CIS Insurance - ** RESOLVED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CIS InsurancePlease adviseI am a pensioner 67 years and have recently lost my mother 94 yearsfuneral 7/11/2013I am attending to her estateAmong her papers I came across an insurance policy with C.I.SIt is a Whole Life Assurance With Profits. Periodical Endowment. Adult (Own Life) Policy and was taken out on the 27th November 1944There is a Premium receipt book showing that an agent would home visitand collect payments - the last collected payment was July 2002.I contacted CIS sending the death certificate and other relevant information.After awhile I received correspondence. I was informed of the value £412.52pBUTwill only be paid out if the payments had been paid upto her death.She had paid from the opening of the policy upto July 2002 which is 57 yearsShould there be a 'pro rata' payment or are they within ther rights not to pay outregards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think these policies only pay out if you continue making the monthly payments up to death. If you stop the payments, the policy ends and you get nothing following death. From what I read, some of these policies offered terrible value for money.

 

Perhaps your mother realised in 2002 that the policy was not worth it. I think CIS stopped making doorstep collections around that time, so maybe your Mother did not want to set up a Direct Debit to continue the policy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiMany thanks for responseDo you think I am wasting my time by writing to the financial ombudsman.I feel that after 57 years of paying she deserves some payment.Shortly after the final 2002 payment mother was admitted to a 'home' with first stage dementiaWe paid the post office for 6 months postage forwarding and never received any correspondence from C.I.S.regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiMany thanks for responseDo you think I am wasting my time by writing to the financial ombudsman.I feel that after 57 years of paying she deserves some payment.Shortly after the final 2002 payment mother was admitted to a 'home' with first stage dementiaWe paid the post office for 6 months postage forwarding and never received any correspondence from C.I.S.regards

 

That is the choice of whoever is the executor or person responsible for your Mothers estate. But they would need to complain to CIS first and give them the opportunity to resolve. It really is up to CIS to provide a full response, with details of the policy.

 

I have since read that actually some of these policies may have had some value, if the policyholder surrendered the policy, before they died. I am not sure whether stopping the payments, is the same as surrendering the policy.

 

The problem many companies have is that they will have gone through so many IT system changes over a period of time. I suspect your Mothers policy records have been archived years ago. The current staff working at CIS may have little knowledge of policies that were taken out nearly 60 years ago. A written complaint is the best way forward, so that CIS have a chance to look at this properly.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I found this on the CIS/Royal London website. As you're talking about a traditional with profits policy, I was surprised that there wasn't any kind of paid up value. Have they mentioned anything about this please? HB

 

Paid up

A policy becomes paid up when a customer is no longer paying premiums.

If this is sooner than allowed for by the policy, then the sum assured is

reduced in line with the payments that have already been made.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure whether stopping the payments, is the same as surrendering the policy.

 

Hello UB.

 

Surrendering the policy means receiving its cash value from the insurance company. If you stop paying but don't cash it in, it's a paid up policy.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that.

 

Have they mentioned how their periodical endowment works please? I can't find anything on them, but I'll have another look at the CIS website.

 

Have they mentioned paid up values or why there isn't one in your mum's case please?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi SORRY for the delay. As advised I dealt with C.I.S. direct - The result of which is that they have PAID out on the policy. The monies are now confirmed to have been transferred to our account. I woud like to thank you all for the help/advice you gave.regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted CIS via claims form from their Internet site, which I completed and sent via recorded delivery with an original copy of the death certificate.After awhile I received correspondence. I was informed of the value £412.52p BUT informed it would only be paid out if the payments had been paid upto her death.She had paid from the opening of the policy 1945 upto July 2002 which is 57 years. As she had not paid for 11 years and noting their response to my claim I assumed they would not pay out.I then wrote to this site requesting help / advice.Should there be a 'pro rata' payment or are they within ther rights not to pay out regards.As your suggestions I decided to contact CIS direct before involving the Ombudsman.You were correct when you mentioned CIS stopped making doorstep collections around this time. They advised that my mothers policy was too costly to administer for the amounts involved and had come up with a final settlement amount which we found acceptable. I had to reclaim forwarding the claim to the department I spoke to on the phone. (they had requested futher information)I can not pass comment on the 'unpaid 11 years - I assume they have waived it - or may have even offered us less than what they would have normally paid.I have now received a cheque which has 'cleared'Once again many thanx for help givenregards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...