Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

M&S loan letter from Moorcroft


mostlygrumpy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wait and see what Moorcroft send.

 

How old is the debt, when was the last payment made?

 

It would be a good idea to check your credit reference files.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this always been a credit card or was it a storecard that was converted to a credit card .

 

If so did you sign anything, get an agreement?

 

Depending on the answers to the Brigs questions you could send a CCA request .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this always been a credit card or was it a storecard that was converted to a credit card .

 

If so did you sign anything, get an agreement?

 

Depending on the answers to the Brigs questions you could send a CCA request .

 

It's a loan not credit card. Last payment made to it was 2 months ago. Should I wait until Moorcroft write to me or send a cca request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Ok . I would wait until you get a letter from moorcrap. I assume the loan was taken out after April 2007 ?

 

Either way once you have something from moorcrap send a S77 request.

 

Have you received a default notice?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Ok . I would wait until you get a letter from moorcrap. I assume the loan was taken out after April 2007 ?

 

Either way once you have something from moorcrap send a S77 request.

 

Have you received a default notice?

 

I think loan was originally taken prior to April 2007. Does that make a difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked credit reference files, with Moorcroft involved it would be a wise move (for reasons I can't go into here).

 

Pre April 2007 the original agreement or a proper copy will be needed to enforce the debt,

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Send off the CCA request

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974

 

If Moorcroft are acting as agents then send it to M&S but let moorcroft know you have sent them the CCA request.

You could send it to moorcroft but they may return it to you and tell you to send it to M&S

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Cca letter to M&S on 6th by recorded delivery. They have cashed £1 cheque on 9th dec. what letter do I send as no reply from them within 12+2. Emailed Moorcroft and told them I'm in dispute. They've written back saying they're going to speak to M&S and take no action in the meantime

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from M&S today recoded delivery. There are 4 sheets.

Sheet 1. Covering letter saying sheets 2,3&4 comply with cca

Sheet 2 - a reconstituted copy of application/agreement form. This is blank where my signature should be. Also loan was from spring 2004 however address on reconstituted copy is one I did not move to until end 2009. Also there is no agreement date or term in months or interest rate just an interest amount, monthly instalments are stated as £0.00

Sheet 3 - standard copy of terms and conditions

Sheet 4 - statement of transactions

 

To my untrained eye the reconstituted agreement is not satisfactory as it has wrong address, no interest rate, monthly oayment of £0.00 and does not bear my signature. Also agreement date is blank as is date below scanned M&S official signature.

 

Your advice re reply would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to comply letter

in the green library tab up top

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?405830-Letter-for-a-Failed-CCA-Request

 

Just two points . You need to change the S78(6) to S77(4)

 

 

The other point is that it states they should have sent a full statement of account which isn't strictly true. I would edit the letter slightly as you have received documents they just didn't comply

 

Dear Sirs

 

ACCOUNT NO: XXXXXX

 

Your attention is drawn to the fact that this account is subject to a serious dispute. On XX/XX/XX, I requested that [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] supply me a copy of the credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 77. To date [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] have failed to comply with my request. Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to [ORIGINAL CREDITOR] , nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

In line with recent OFT Guidance surrounding Unenforceability, I presume you're aware that the OFT has stipulated the following;

Sections 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 outline the information creditors must provide to debtors under fixed-term, running account & Hire Agreements. Under these sections a debtor can pay £1 to get:

a copy of their agreement

copies of some of the other documents mentioned in their agreement

a statement of account.

If this information is not provided within 12 working days the debt becomes unenforceable. This means a creditor cannot:

make the debtor pay the debt before they're supposed to

get a court judgment against the debtor

As this account is clearly unenforceable, I expect you to write back and confirm that no further action will be taken and that the account is now closed and no further correspondence will take place. I require that you clarify your position on this point as failure to do so, even by omission or lack of a response, will be regarded as an attempt to deliberately misrepresent or conceal the legal position regarding this matter to which an appropriate complaint will be made to the OFT.

Consequently, any legal action you pursue will not only be fully and vigorously defended, it will also be averred as both unlawful and vexatious. As such I respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the original creditor for immediate resolution prior to my seeking legal advice; due to the fact you cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities as the account was already in dispute at the time you became involved.

Yours faithfully,

 

*

Sign using a computer font

 

That is an alternative

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

failure to comply letter

in the green library tab up top

 

dx

 

They have today sent the details as described in the longer post above. The failure to comply letter seems to be for non receipt of the forms. How do I dispute the wrong address please? Also the loan was taken in Spring 2004 do they have to supply me with a form bearing my signature because if when the facility was in 2004? As always thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?405830-Letter-for-a-Failed-CCA-Request

 

Just two points . You need to change the S78(6) to S77(4)

 

 

The other point is that it states they should have sent a full statement of account which isn't strictly true. I would edit the letter slightly as you have received documents they just didn't comply

 

 

 

That is an alternative

 

Do I say it does not comply as the address is incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not tell them what is wrong , just that they have not complied with the CCA request . You could if you want say something like , I would refer you to Carey v HSBC Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) (23 December 2009) where HHJ Waksman detailed what was required.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not tell them what is wrong , just that they have not complied with the CCA request . You could if you want say something like , I would refer you to Carey v HSBC Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB) (23 December 2009) where HHJ Waksman detailed what was required.

Thank you. I assume it is ok to alter the letter slightly to reflect it is to M&S themselves not Moorcroft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should add , they do not need to supply a signature on a CCA request but it should be a TRUE copy of what you WOULD have signed. As the address is wrong it clearly isn't..but why tell them that?

 

As for actual enforcement they will probably need to supply a copy of the original agreement. I think they are pretty stuffed

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...