Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot


Hayley1210
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please help :-(

I've been advised by some good people on here over last year regarding some debts, I am in payment arrangements with all however regarding a black horse loan from 2007 I was paying a dca called ascent with interest frozen by black horse. However out the blue last month I received a letter from Cabot saying I had not met the agreed payment and to contact them. There was reference to a black horse loan in their letter. I write on 5th nov stating I did not acknowledge any debt and to provide evidence, since thus I'm inundated with letters and phone calls. I sent letter recorded, which has been received their end. I really don't know what to do ice heard Cabot can file for ccj'a quite quickly :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been making payments to ascent for nearly a year now, I owe blackhorse about 4700 and have been paying 25 a month. I've not heard off bh or ascent and continue with my standing order. I absolutely won't speak to Cabot. Upon receipt of their first letter I wrote off with the standard I do not acknowledge this debt, and asked for evidence etc, but since it's I've received numerous letters, with no regard to my request. Is there a time limit before I should write back, I'm really concerned I've heard Cabot go for ccj's and enforce sales of houses (not that I have any equity in mine. How can they just expect me to start paying them something they've provided no proof of? I don't understand the system :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have dealt with Cabot on a few occasions with help and advice from the good people on this site. As said previously don't panic. Cabot can be beaten. Check your credit file to see who actually owns the debt. Then ask for proof of the debt from Cabot. Send a CCA request to Cabot ( I would do this by recorded delivery ). They have 12 + 2working days in which to reply, if they don't they are in default of your request. Lets see what comes back from them then we can take it from there. It is highly unlikely Cabot will rush to court without for a ccj without documentation which is what you are asking for in your CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It could be that the transfer of the debt to Cabot has not yet been registered on your file. Maybe good idea to check other credit reference file , ie. Experian, Noddle, Call Credit and the like. Some offer a 30 day free trial but be sure to cancel before the end of the trial date. Noddle are free all the time but not necessarily up to date. Re your F&F from Cabot, does this offer show any amount of discount, if so it may indicate that they have no valid paper work relating to the account. Sent a CCA request to Cabot to help clarify the [position then you will know for sure. They have 12 + 2 working days to reply after receipt of the request. Send request recorded delivery so you have proof it has been received.

See what comes back then let this site know and further help will be available. I certainly would not take any action, especially at this stage in respect of the F&F. Lets wait and see what Cabot have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's showing as settled because Blackhorse have sold it and, as Boltmaker says, Cabot probably haven't registered it yet.

 

Boltmaker is right in saying that the amount of discount may indicate the likelihood of their having the paperwork, so the best thing to do is to see what the CCA request turns up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more. Get that CCA sent off , if you are not sure how to do it here is a link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974

 

Just a reminder do not sign it and if you pay by cheque ask someone else to write one for you and give them the quid.

 

Any offer of F&F should be treated with caution, remember that Cabot may have only paid 10% for the debt so if they can quickly offer you a 50% reduction they are still quids in on a very short time scale. Think about it, a return on their investment of 500% , puts PDLs to shame. It does not automatically mean there is a problem.

 

Also if you have been making payments as agreed they can not alter those payments.

 

Did you get a notice of assignment i.e a letter telling you that they had bought the debt?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, thanks for your replies, I didn't receive any notice but cabot sent a copy when I sent the I do not acknowledge this debt letter to them. I clarified with blackhorse by phone that they had sold the debt. Cabot have offered 30% discount which I couldn't afford even if I wanted to. I curreny owe 3800. I am in the process of SAR to blackhorse to see what charges etc I might be able to claim back I know there's a lot, and I'll CCA cabot. I'll keep posted and thank you so much for the help and advice :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A 30% discount is generally good news for you as it tends to indicate that Cabot may not have the correct or sufficient paperwork for the debt they have purchased. I would continue as you are and get all the info you can from BH and Cabot. See and analyse what comes back then let this site know and further help and guidance will be forthcoming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...