Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sunnyside V Lloydstsb


sunnyside
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Sunnyside,

 

Personally I would take the written letter approach, this way your progress can be measured against other peoples experiences and correspondence, as well as it being more official and trackable.

 

 

 

Good luck

wavelab:D

LloydsTSB

S.A.R Sent 12/9/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm filling in the prelim letter and there is a section in red about defaults on your credit record. I cannot find anything about this in the step-by-step guide but am I supposed to delete this bit as I don't think I have any on my record?

Thanks

Sunny

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,

here is a link to the templates library

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

 

when you post a new question, you will need to be in the correct forum ie:- this is the Lloyds tsb forum.

there is a "button to click on called new thread" at the top of each page, use this to post your questions, then it will be read by all the forum and you will have more chance of help.

hope this helps

s williams

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just about to email my prelim letter using the address from the bank contact details section and it says to use this email address for queries regarding technical difficulties on internet banking and questions about D/D and S/O. Does anyone have a more appropriate email address for lloyds? Otherwise I will post it to the Birmingham address.

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I sent my prelim letter off yesterday evening by email - I thought I would get an automated acknowledge back but nothing so far. I wonder if they will respond to me by email or written letter ....... watch this space!

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck Sunnyside, I've taken to Faxing too especially when you get to the negotiating settlement time, with Sechiari and Co.

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emails are aceptable forms of communication however you can,t prove they were received it...snail mail maybey slower but atleast you get a signature to prove they received it...

This is MY oppinion for what it worth

BARCLAYS BANK LBA 23/10/05 £2,626.67:)MCOL ISSUED 11/11/05

LOMBARD DIRECT LBA + Default removal 25/10/06 £290.50 :grin: Received settlement but they won,t remove default

BARCLAYCARD LFB 10/9/06 £320.00 :cool:

AKTIV KAPITAL LBA DEFAULT REMOVAL letter sent 22/9/06 + 23/10/06 and as yet have had no reply (sent letter to all 3 CRA re-there none compliance):confused:

 

"divant worry aboot what ya owe let them woory that want,s it off ya"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll find that when you get to the stage when you're trying to negotiate settlement with Lloyds, that Sechiari then act on their behalf and they do not have an email ( well not one they'll disclose) and all your communication will then have to be by mail, telephone and fax... and do bear in mind that most of us who are writing and patiently awaiting replies from Sechiari are having to cope with their "clearing dept" so even when you send or try to receive a letter counting the time after it was sent doesn't match up with the time they read it or in fact send it !

Sorry to sound pesimistic but it's from current personal experience !

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Is this their response to the Preliminary letter? If so stick to YOUR deadlines and send them the Letter Before Action next, don't bother giving them another 2 weeks to investigate

Good luck!

Barty :)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Barty

Thanks for your response. I initially emailed the Prelim Letter on 25th October so they have replied to me within the 14 days but obviously with no offer. Do you think they are using delay tactics?

Sunnyside

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...