Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work Programme Issues


PaulBrown85
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Having a bit of a problem with the Work Programme lately, and I have no idea what to do. The Job Centre and Seetec themselves are extremely unhelpful and I'm feeling rather annoyed and wound up with them.

 

The problem is back in March, I was sanctioned on my JSA for missing 2 appointments with Seetec. I had chicken pox and phoned my advisor at Seetec telling her that I wasn't able to make my appointments that week, and she told me there was no problem, thanks for letting her know and she'll see me the following week at my next appointment. Couple of weeks later, I received a letter saying I had missed two appointments and was being sanctioned for 4 weeks due to the fact I didn't send in a "Change of Circumstances" form. My advisor didn't tell me I had to fill this is and I'd never filled one in before so I had no idea I had to do that. So a reconsideration was sent in, which was turned into, without my knowledge, an appeal. Got the decision on that back, and the sanction stood because my advisor lied through the teeth to the decision maker saying I showed no signs of illness (Which she even commented to me on the appointment I went in "Oh your looking very spotty aren't you, how you feeling now?") and that she told me over the phone that I had to contact the Job Centre and tell them I wasn't able to go to Seetec that week (Which she didn't, but surprise, surprise, the calls aren't recorded).

 

This isn't the problem though. Today, 15/8/2013, I received a letter saying I'd missed an appointment with Seetec on the 31/1/13. I have absolutely zero recollection of missing an appointment that day, and I was never told I'd missed an appointment. All I can think of is that at one point, I telephoned my advisor saying that I had to take my son to the doctors because he wasn't well at all, and the appointment fell during an appointment I had. I explained this to her and she told me not to worry, and come in the next day (I think It was for a job search, but I'm not sure). I really have no idea if this was the appointment they're referring too. Simple fact is, I just can't remember ever missing an appointment with them.

 

I asked the JC why I hadn't heard of this earlier, and they said that it had been put on hold along with hundreds of others... yet they contacted me instantly about the incident with the chicken pox. I really have no idea what to do now. The JC said just think back and write down why you missed the appointment, but I just can't remember. Do I just put the doctors appointment with my son and hope that it was that? Which I told her about anyway and she didn't have a problem with? I just can't think what to do and I can't afford another sanction at all.

 

Any help would be great as I'm at an utter loss at the moment.

 

Thanks, Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always, always record any conversation with WP provider "advisers" - As you have already found out to your cost, they habitually lie.

 

As for any appointments, before sanctions can be inflicted for failing to attend, they must be made in writing1 - emails, texts, and verbal instructions are not valid. These appointment letters must also contain specific wording explaining the consequences of failing to comply without good reason. Having a contagious infection such as chicken pox would be one such reason. Further more, raising of a benefit doubt (a.k.a. sanction) should be done promptly as soon as reasonable grounds have been established2. Raising a sanction some seven months after the event is hardly likely to be considered "within a reasonable time".

To be honest, I don't think there is much that can be done to overturn the sanction from March, as you should have informed the DWP. You could try another appeal based on the fact that the Seetec "adviser" had failed to provide any written guidance and include any notes from your GP regarding the contagion risk.

 

1) https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/152662/response/376951/attach/5/WP%20JR%20Assurance%20letter%20v%20final%203.pdf

2) http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wp-pg-chapter-6-22-october-2012.pdf - See page 10, para 49

Edited by Mr.P

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the advice Mr.P, it's set my mind at rest.

 

Strangely, I had a call from my advisor at Seetec whilst I was out (this advisor I've had since June or so, so not the advisor who claimed I missed an appointment in January) and he was telling me that he's been back through my appointment history, and he can't see a missed appointment on either of the dates I've given. He's as confused as what I am, yet the woman who the JC contacted stated that I had missed one and they must know why before the 23rd of this month. When I asked how the hell am I supposed to remember what I was doing back then, her response was along the lines of "Not my problem, ask your partner and just try and remember". My partner can't remember anything at all!

 

I've got an appointment tomorrow so we're going to try and get to the bottom of this, as it's confusing and completely out the blue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Having a bit of a problem with the Work Programme lately, and I have no idea what to do. The Job Centre and Seetec themselves are extremely unhelpful and I'm feeling rather annoyed and wound up with them.

 

The problem is back in March, I was sanctioned on my JSA for missing 2 appointments with Seetec. I had chicken pox and phoned my advisor at Seetec telling her that I wasn't able to make my appointments that week, and she told me there was no problem, thanks for letting her know and she'll see me the following week at my next appointment. Couple of weeks later, I received a letter saying I had missed two appointments and was being sanctioned for 4 weeks due to the fact I didn't send in a "Change of Circumstances" form. My advisor didn't tell me I had to fill this is and I'd never filled one in before so I had no idea I had to do that. So a reconsideration was sent in, which was turned into, without my knowledge, an appeal. Got the decision on that back, and the sanction stood because my advisor lied through the teeth to the decision maker saying I showed no signs of illness (Which she even commented to me on the appointment I went in "Oh your looking very spotty aren't you, how you feeling now?") and that she told me over the phone that I had to contact the Job Centre and tell them I wasn't able to go to Seetec that week (Which she didn't, but surprise, surprise, the calls aren't recorded).

 

This isn't the problem though. Today, 15/8/2013, I received a letter saying I'd missed an appointment with Seetec on the 31/1/13. I have absolutely zero recollection of missing an appointment that day, and I was never told I'd missed an appointment. All I can think of is that at one point, I telephoned my advisor saying that I had to take my son to the doctors because he wasn't well at all, and the appointment fell during an appointment I had. I explained this to her and she told me not to worry, and come in the next day (I think It was for a job search, but I'm not sure). I really have no idea if this was the appointment they're referring too. Simple fact is, I just can't remember ever missing an appointment with them.

 

I asked the JC why I hadn't heard of this earlier, and they said that it had been put on hold along with hundreds of others... yet they contacted me instantly about the incident with the chicken pox. I really have no idea what to do now. The JC said just think back and write down why you missed the appointment, but I just can't remember. Do I just put the doctors appointment with my son and hope that it was that? Which I told her about anyway and she didn't have a problem with? I just can't think what to do and I can't afford another sanction at all.

 

Any help would be great as I'm at an utter loss at the moment.

 

Thanks, Paul

 

Do you write down all appointments? that can perhaps jog your memory what you have done during that time! Never ever just ring the dwp or a work programmer always follow it by a letter instantly, Ask your adviser to give you his/her email address straight away so you can send her email when ever you need to!

 

I follow everything with a letter or email if I make a phone either to the dwp or Ingeus, I didn't have my friend's cathy's Ingeus adviser's email I rang the office and ask for her email address so that I can email should I need to!

 

The lady might not have a problem with what you've told her about taking your son to the doctors but it is not her that make the decision about sanctioning it's who ever else that make the decision about sanctions that matter here so again do not trust her reactions, write to the dwp and the seetec and explain why you've your appointment!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the advice Mr.P, it's set my mind at rest.

 

Strangely, I had a call from my advisor at Seetec whilst I was out (this advisor I've had since June or so, so not the advisor who claimed I missed an appointment in January) and he was telling me that he's been back through my appointment history, and he can't see a missed appointment on either of the dates I've given. He's as confused as what I am, yet the woman who the JC contacted stated that I had missed one and they must know why before the 23rd of this month. When I asked how the hell am I supposed to remember what I was doing back then, her response was along the lines of "Not my problem, ask your partner and just try and remember". My partner can't remember anything at all!

 

I've got an appointment tomorrow so we're going to try and get to the bottom of this, as it's confusing and completely out the blue.

 

Write down all your appointment on a calender as soon as you receive your letter for appointments like that you will know what's what if any of the dwp or seetec write to you and if you can't make your appointment write that down on the calender too if you were ill or otherwise that is for your own benefit, it helps a lot trust me that what I do all the times then if dwp or seetec pull any stunt you can tell them straight away!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing though Helen, prior to my Chicken Pox illness, I've NEVER missed or even been late for an appointment, so I've had no idea what I'm supposed to do when I was ill etc. Hence why I phoned Seetec. Plus when I went into the Joke Shop (Job Centre) about a problem or question I had with my claim, I was told by the worker I spoke too that because I was with Seetec now, they were dealing with everything, so any problems, questions or anything like that, I was to deal with them instead of the Job Centre. I didn't quite believe that, so I went to ask someone else if that was true, and they confirmed it to me that any problems I had, I had to go to Seetec. That's why I contacted them about my Chicken Pox. At no point did my advisor tell me to contact the JC about a change of circumstances form. A claim which she denied to the decision maker who contacted her.

 

I'm at a loss about this, If I contact my advisor saying I can't make an appointment for reasons beyond my control, and then she tells me not to worry she'll rebook it, why would that be classed as a missed appointment? I've had friends who have done it and nothing has ever come of it. I've had friends who have lied about appointments to get out of job searches, and nothing comes of it. Coupled with the fact my current advisor said there's no record of me missing an appointment on my notes they have, it's confused him too. I shall definitely be bringing a book with me which I will be asking my advisor to sign every visit, and I shall record every conversation I have with them over the phone, letting them know it's being recorded obviously.

 

I'm in agreement with Mr.P on this one though, they've failed to tell me within a reasonable amount of time about an appointment I missed, which I will show them the information that Mr.P has given me. When I missed my appointments through Chicken Pox, they notified me of possible sanction within 3-4 weeks of missing them. 7 months is a bit extreme for them to expect me what I was doing on that day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The JC basically wash their hands of you while you're on the WP - they won't look for vacancies for you nor even do a quick jobsearch while you sign on. Total apathy and a 'not my problem for 2 years' attitude.

 

I've read a lot of cases of people unable to make appointments with their WP, phoning in and being told it's okay, only to later find out the WP has referred them to the JC as being absent. It's happening far too often - and at too many different WP's - to be coincidence or a 'communication breakdown'. No doubt the WP's have sanction targets too, as the JC does.

 

I hope your current advisor will back you up with regard to the alleged missed appointment. Definitely need to record everything in future to cover yourself. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got an appointment tomorrow so we're going to try and get to the bottom of this, as it's confusing and completely out the blue.

 

(this may be a bit late, but...)

 

Demand a printout of ALL alleged appointments from your initial referral AND copies of ALL appointment letters. With these printouts in hand, you can check to see which ones were mandatory and which ones were just invites - If any of the latter coincide with the alleged failure to attend dates, you can appeal on the grounds of invalid mandation.

 

I would also recommend that you demand copies of all meeting notes typed up by previous "advisers" and keep these filed away for future reference. If it isn't in writing (or you don't have it on tape), it didn't happen !

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(this may be a bit late, but...)

 

Demand a printout of ALL alleged appointments from your initial referral AND copies of ALL appointment letters. With these printouts in hand, you can check to see which ones were mandatory and which ones were just invites - If any of the latter coincide with the alleged failure to attend dates, you can appeal on the grounds of invalid mandation.

 

I would also recommend that you demand copies of all meeting notes typed up by previous "advisers" and keep these filed away for future reference. If it isn't in writing (or you don't have it on tape), it didn't happen !

 

Hi Mr.P

 

I would request all copies of appointment letters, but they didn't give me any. All my advisor used to do was tell me, verbally, when my appointments were, and sometimes wrote them on a little card for me. The only piece of paper that had my appointments on were my 'review' letters. This told me the date of my next mandatory review appointment. All the others were just job searches where i'd have to attend the building, do a quick job search, then leave. I never actually saw my advisor on Job Search appointments.

 

I know for an absolute fact I have NEVER missed a review appointment, and I also know I've never missed a Job Search appointment, except for the Chicken Pox incident and my sons doctors appointment, both of which I phoned Seetec and explained the situation. My current advisor has told me that my old advisor never used to put it on the system that i'd attended, so there were quite a few that he could see where it said I wasn't present, but there was proof of job search done? I just don't understand it. The exact words from my advisor this afternoon on the phone was:

 

"Can you bring the letter with you tomorrow, as I've been back through the system and I can't see anything about a missed appointment on any of the dates you gave me"

 

I'll definitely be recording every visit I do now for proof should this ever happen again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All my advisor used to do was tell me, verbally, when my appointments were, and sometimes wrote them on a little card for me. The only piece of paper that had my appointments on were my 'review' letters. This told me the date of my next mandatory review appointment.

 

Mandatory appointments that could lead to a sanction if you fail to attend MUST be made in writing and include all the words prescribed on page 3 of the first document I linked to (for all appointments made after 14th Feb 2012). Verbal appointments or scribbled notes on a card are not acceptable.

 

If your new adviser is unable to provide copies of correctly worded letters for the appointments back in January or March, then get it in writing that no such letters exist or were ever issued - With this in hand, you can appeal against any failure to attend sanctions citing invalid or nonexistent mandation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mandatory appointments that could lead to a sanction if you fail to attend MUST be made in writing and include all the words prescribed on page 3 of the first document I linked to (for all appointments made after 14th Feb 2012). Verbal appointments or scribbled notes on a card are not acceptable.

 

If your new adviser is unable to provide copies of correctly worded letters for the appointments back in January or March, then get it in writing that no such letters exist or were ever issued - With this in hand, you can appeal against any failure to attend sanctions citing invalid or nonexistent mandation.

 

Would a Subject Access Request to the WPP also requesting the postal logs be a good idea in this situation?

 

All WP mail out should be logged. If a letter is not fully recorded as sent, has a different sent date/address or a copy of it not stored it's an easy win at tribunal.

 

Just a thought as it's how you always beat missed ATOS appointments due to missing letters for ESA when it gets to the tribunal. Their logs only show something was sent and there is no copy of the letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had my appointment at Seetec today, my advisor contacted a member of the Job Centre yesterday, and he told me that they looked into my account and saw no pending sanctions or any indication of a sanction pending. This contradicts what I was told personally at the JC yesterday when I was told that there WAS a pending Benefit doubt over a missed appointment on the 31st January 2013 but the systems hadn't been updated to reflect it.

 

Here's the odd part though... The letter states that I was told on the 21st January 2013 that I had an appointment on the 31st January 2013 and I failed to attend. My advisor showed me my attendance record from January to Now. On the 21st, I contacted Seetec about my sons doctors appointment, my then advisor noted this and told me to come in the next day at 10:30am. I attended the appointment though it wasn't noted in my records. Now the alleged appointment on the 31st January... I DIDN'T have an appointment on that date, there is nothing to suggest I was supposed to be there, and no WP08 letter was sent out around that time either.

 

My advisor printed me a copy of my attendance record, but the thing that's bothering me, is that it says on the record that I didn't attend an appointment on the 4th February 2013. Again, no action was ever taken about this, no WP08 was sent out, and I'm pretty sure I DID attend, but there's no proof of this because Seetec destroyed all sign in/out sheets around that time, they only started keeping them from May, and they don't have access to Financial Records so they said they can't check the travel expense sheets to see if I did attend. The only reason I can think that it says I didn't attend was either my advisor was off on that appointment and it wasn't recorded, or she just simply forgot/wasn't told I attended as it was a Job Search appointment. Could this be dragged up if I show them proof of the none appointment, or is this too far in the past to be sanctioned?

 

I also asked them about the letters I was supposed to receive for every mandatory appointment, and I was told that they don't need to do that, as they supposedly sent me a letter when I very first enrolled saying that ALL appointments were mandatory and if I didn't attend, I may loose my benefit. I told him about the guidelines sent from the DWP to Seetec, but was told they do things differently and it's pretty much the same thing. All in all, my advisor was extremely helpful today and told me that if any questions were asked by the DM, he'd defend me and point out that no appointment was ever scheduled. I'm just a little afraid about using the printout in case they start questioning me about the 4/2/13 appointment. Saying that, Seetec have no proof that I was or wasn't there, and no action was ever taken/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I told him about the guidelines sent from the DWP to Seetec, but was told they do things differently and it's pretty much the same thing.

 

As far as I'm aware, there's only ONE standard set of Work Programme Provider Guidance documents - and every provider gets them. I've never seen or heard of any 'personalised' versions which only relate to Seetec, A4e, etc. I think your advisor is just giving you the usual BS.

 

Though providors have leeway in designing the content of their courses, they must all abide by standard guidelines - which include letters and how they are required to contact you.

 

It sounds like their entire system is in a mess and they're not bothering to issue anything in writing. The DWP Third Party Contracts investigators would probably be very interested in paying them a visit (they are the people who can tell the provider to change things, or else risk losing their contract).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seetec hold sway in East London for the provision of the Work Programme and Mandatory Work Activity, as they are pretty much the only game in town they think they can make the rules up as they go along.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually in Salford, so i'm not sure if they're the only ones around here.

 

I do agree that they seem to think that the rules don't apply to them, and for all the supposed mandatory appointments I've had, I've never had a letter or anything saying I may loose my benefits should I not attend etc... To be fair, I don't think I've EVER had a letter off them regarding any kind of appointment? I don't think they really care to be honest with you.

 

I'm just a little worried that if I show the proof that I didn't have an appointment on the 31/1/13, and they see that on the printout I've given, it says Client did not attend on the 4/2/13, they'll go digging into that and see why. Even though no action was taken at the time, can they take action now, or is it far too late to do so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DWP issued guidance requires a provider to submit a WP08 within days of a Failure to Attend in order to preserve the link between cause and sanction in the mind of the claimant. However, as you have already found out, some providers seek to ignore the guidance notes and make it up as they go along. Furthermore, the DWP would appear to be sitting on a pile of benefit doubts and are issuing sanctions over a year after the event (thus breaking the cause-sanction link).

 

In your situation, I would blank out any problematic dates and only show evidence that relates to specific times. I would also demand that any mandatory appointments are made in writing in accordance with current DWP procedures - This covers your back and ensures you have documentary evidence for your file and costs the provider money (paper, envelope, stamp, & time).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...