Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sovereign Credit Management


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6595 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a debt collection agency used by Thomson Directories. Having fallen ill last year and unable to work for a couple of months I could not pay Thomson's who then employed Sovereign. The amount owing is £777.27.

 

Sovereign, via a Mr. Hardy, phoned me incessantly day after day after day. The guy was a real motormouth, continuously repeating himself telling me how I needed to resolve the matter NOW to avoid court action etc. I consistently repeated to him that (a) I did not deal with third parties and would deal only directly with Thomson, and (b) under no circumstances would I discuss the matter by phone. Nothing I said shut thisd guy up, and my only way to get rid of him was often to hang up on him, after warning him that I was about to do so. He responded by phoning me back immediately - again and again and again, about seven times on average. I countered this by simply rejecting the call (he was costing me a small fortune, as my calls were diverted to my mobile). Even after leaving an answerphone message he would stiull try to call again and again.

 

This led to over 100 phone calls in just a few weeks and several letters. One such letter steted that they would be charging me (plus VAT) £10 per letter, £25 per default letter, £2.50 per phone call, and £75 for an agent calling at my house (this never happened.

 

I eventually wrote back stating that I would be charging £20 per letter (reply), £5 per phone call (answered or not) and so on. Because of his manner and the incessant harrassment I asked for £2000 compensation.

 

This stopped the calls and letters, although the debt still remains and some months on it has now been passed on to another agency, JB Debt Recovery of Glasgow.

 

Their technique has been to phone roughly twice a day although when I answer the phone goes dead. I tried phoning them back anonymously and they introduced themselves as "JBDC Banking Services", although when I asked them what type of services they offered the operator refused to say and kept on asking me for my name and reference number. I declined.

 

My point is this: I have found over the years that when one debt collection agency fails, the technique of the companies owed money is to just switch from one debt collection agency to another. This usualy happens when I write to them and state that (for whatever reason) I will be fighting any potential court action with a substantial counterclaim. Presumably at this stage the agency then decided to wash their hands of the matter. Are companies allowed to continualy harrass you in this way by simply switching agencies when one fails or concedes?

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe I read in a seperate thread that debts can only be sold on twice.

 

I'm sure this doesn't stop some from trying, so if you have evidence of them exceeding this figure, then we should get some clarification of the law.

 

Although I have never experienced those levels of harassment, one of my debts has been moved on twice. I suspect it is because they have never quite found a way making me increase my monthly payments beyond £1.30 a month, which would take 36 more years to repay!

 

Since it probably costs them 10 times that figure per month just to deal with me, I guess they are not very happy bunnies!

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Harrassment as such as you describe isn't allowed anyway by anyone anyway as per Section 40 of The Administration of Justice Act 1970, for Harassment.

 

You should contact your Local Trading Standards for advice on this one.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe I read in a seperate thread that debts can only be sold on twice.

 

I'm sure this doesn't stop some from trying, so if you have evidence of them exceeding this figure, then we should get some clarification of the law.

 

Although I have never experienced those levels of harassment, one of my debts has been moved on twice. I suspect it is because they have never quite found a way making me increase my monthly payments beyond £1.30 a month, which would take 36 more years to repay!

 

Since it probably costs them 10 times that figure per month just to deal with me, I guess they are not very happy bunnies!

 

I don't think there's any legal restriction on the number of times a debt can be sold. However, as it gets older, its value decreases so it's unlikely to get sold too often.

 

I am pretty certain that you will continue to get harassed for this debt as once you get into this cycle, it's almost impossible to get out of. As soon as one company gives up another will probably start again.. Sometimes debts get passed around the same organisation but using different company names. As Cheddar suggested Trading Standards and references to the Admin of Justice Act may be your best bet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6595 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...