Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA offence report ALLEGING my unlicenced vehicle parked on road.. PROOF?


h00vertime
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3933 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

recieved this letter from DVLA alleging my car was parked on the road untaxed. the letter states i have to pay eighty pounds. i never recieved a ticket or saw one on my car. they havnt sent me any proof that my car was even there or any pics.

 

should they not have to prove this?? where did the offence report come from??

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should have to prove it, and you can make them have to do so in court, if you deny the offence.

 

Was your car on the road, untaxed?

 

If so, pay up.

If not, don't pay and elect for it to go to court, where you can have the evidenced tested in court. Be prepared for a higher fine and a criminal conviction from the court if guilty, though.

 

So, again:

Was your car on the road, untaxed?

 

Edited : crem has also posted, but more succinctly!

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it sorn? If not and it hwd no tax, the dvla assume it is on the road with no tax.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, renegadeimp : OP should only go to court if:

A) it wasn't on the road, and

B) it had had a SORN' declaration sent,

 

else they are doomed to fail either for no tax, or no SORN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time, was your car on a public road or not? If it was, you are liable, if it was not, you are not liable.

 

If you disposed of the car to an authorised scrap dealer, they give (or send) you a certificate of destruction and notify DVLA that it has been scrapped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it wasn't on a public road but wasn't either taxed or SORN'd : an offense has been committed.

 

From the OP's reply of "maybe :(", I take it the OP is no longer as indignant as their original post suggests?

 

How dare the DVLA accuse you of, well, something you now accept you may have done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ok i boobed. it was parked outside my flat on the road at the alleged time. i wasnt going to tax a car that i was going to scrap imminently.

 

i was just trying to see if i could get out of it. who wouldn't?

 

iv just got bk from ship today (im in the navy) and found an earlier for failing to tax asking for $80 reduced to $40 if paid by the 27th (tommorow) but the telephone lines arnt open on a saturday!!

 

is there no way to pay online?! you can buy a tax disc online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ok i boobed. it was parked outside my flat on the road at the alleged time. i wasnt going to tax a car that i was going to scrap imminently.

 

If it was left on the road for a predetermined time for collection by the following service then I believe this counts as ownership change. (at least that is what our local council notes allude to on vehicle collection/disposal by the UVC). And you are also providing the emergency services with test equipment which could save lives.

 

http://www.unwanted-vehicle-collection.co.uk/about.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was left on the road for a predetermined time for collection by the following service then I believe this counts as ownership change. (at least that is what our local council notes allude to on vehicle collection/disposal by the UVC). And you are also providing the emergency services with test equipment which could save lives.

 

http://www.unwanted-vehicle-collection.co.uk/about.html

 

 

It is the person who left it there, not necessarily the owner, who commits the offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a car is left on the road without tax, then the police/DVLa/whoever will go after the registered keeper and ask who the owner is. If they dont get an answer, they go for the RK. Trust me, i had a massive battle with the DVLA 4 years ago for this kind of thing. They dont want to hear excuses. They know the car was on the road with no tax, so they just see money signs.

 

Thats why they brought in SORN. On one hand it gives them less admin stuff to do, as their computers will automatically send out the "fines", on the other hand it is a HUGE money maker for them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 'the person' who commits the offence if they use or keep an unlicensed vehicle, not necessarily the owner or registered keeper - s.29, Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994.

 

However there is the offence of being the registered keeper of an un-licensed vehicle - s.31A of the same act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

iv scince sold the car for scrap. well i just gave matey the v5 and he gave me the money. im not supposed to have done anything else am i??

 

Yes you should have done something else! It is the responsibility of the current RK (you) to notify the DVLA of a change of status on the vehicle.

 

If you sold it to a person, you give them the completed section 10 (green slip V5C/2) and send the entire remainder to the DV:LA duly completed with new keeper details.

 

If you give/sell it to a garage or dismantler you give them the majority of the V5C and send the section 9 (yellow slip V5C/3) to the DVLA.

 

Until the DVLA are correctly notified of this change of keeper using one of these authorised methods then I am afraid you will remain responsible for any fines the vehicle is due. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you should have done something else! It is the responsibility of the current RK (you) to notify the DVLA of a change of status on the vehicle.

Don't forget to keep a copy of whatever you send and either get a Certificate of Posting or send it "Signed For" or Special Delivery to minimise DVLA opportunity to say that you never sent it or that they never received it (it won't stop them trying, however - they've even been known to claim that people send them empty envelopes to claim that documents were sent etc).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...