Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bailliff will not discuss offer of payment just wants to attend tomorrow


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

Can anyone advise . I am trying to help a friend.

Its regarding an old fine at a midlands magistrates court that has just shown up out of the blue

A bailiff turned up this morning with a distress warrant for an old fine of approx £600 plus £ 300 charges that are not detailed.

The bailiff says he will not discuss the matter and will turn up in the morning with the police and a locksmith to enforce the warrant.

I have phoned him on my friends behalf to try to make an offer of payment but he was not interested at all.

My friend lives with a partner in a rented house [ partner only is the tenant ] and has very few worldly goods and no vehicle of his own.

The bailliff stated to me that he is an ' enforcement bailiff' subcontracted to Marstons. That I would not be able to phone Marstons and that they would just refer me back to himself.

I explained my friends circumstances and said could an arrangement to pay be made.

He said no only full payment because ' its gone past the stage where arrangements can be made'

I have checked on the Bailliffs register and cant find the name on his card.

Please can anyone help.

I think he wants to attend and try to enforce even though the circumstances have been explained just so he can add more charges.

What can my friend do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What your friend should do is phone the Midland court and ask them to transfer this to their nearest Magistrates court. At the nearest Magistrates court your friend should be able to do a statutory declaration about not receiving any final steps notice and they can ask the Magistrates for a payment arrangement based on income/expenses. ( takes details with them). If the Magistrates accept the stat dec, it would just be the fine to be paid and not any bailiff fees. This needs to be done first thing tomorrow morning.

 

Bailiff do not normally force entry. They should go back to Magistrates to get permission to force entry. What they are trying to do is obtain payment through fear. If the bailiff and/or police visit before this is sorted out, do not even open the door. The Police are not allowed to insist on the door being opened unless the believe that a criminal offence is being committed. Just tell them that this is being resolved with Magistrates.

 

Get this sorted out with the courts and then you don't have to deal with bailiffs. The bailiff may be registered with any court and it is just messing around asking for their details. They do have to be licenced to enforce court fines.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

 

This matter dates from a long time ago and my friend cant remember the court . He thinks the bailliff mentioned Leicester so will ring them in the morning.

 

Should I compose a letter for him to stick on the door stating that he is unsure what this is about and is contacting the Magistrates court.

 

t Just been told thathe bailliff has stated that he is coming to the house at 6am tomorrow with the police and a locksmith!!

 

 

 

My friend is already talking about trying to borrow the £900

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

 

This matter dates from a long time ago and my friend cant remember the court . He thinks the bailliff mentioned Leicester so will ring them in the morning.

 

Should I compose a letter for him to stick on the door stating that he is unsure what this is about and is contacting the Magistrates court.

 

t Just been told thathe bailliff has stated that he is coming to the house at 6am tomorrow with the police and a locksmith!!

 

 

 

He is

 

Just standard threats to see whether they can get payment. Sort it out with Magistrates. A letter can be put on the door that the Magistrates court is being contacted about this and will be resolved directly with Magistrates.

 

Keep accessible doors and windows closed/locked and don't open the door. The Police (if) they are called, often misunderstand the different warrants bailiffs may have. These don't give the bailiff the right to force entry. There are very few occasions when a bailiff can actually use force to enter a private home.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep any car you own away from your house, as otherwise they may try to seize it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Police (if) they are called, often misunderstand the different warrants bailiffs may have. These don't give the bailiff the right to force entry. There are very few occasions when a bailiff can actually use force to enter a private home.

 

Do I need to put anything about tthat in the letter that will be put on the door?

 

It will say that the house is rented in a third partys name ? Should the third party's name be stated ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to put anything about tthat in the letter that will be put on the door?

 

It will say that the house is rented in a third partys name ? Should the third party's name be stated ?

 

You could put that the house is owned by a third party and that the person named x is only a tenant. You should not provide the name of the landlord/house owner, as I have read that bailiffs have used this info before to try to embarass people into payment. i.e phoning the landlord about the debtor living in their house.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I am presuming a check would be made with the DVLA before a vehicle is seized ?

 

They should, but unfortunately they don't appear to. They have seized third parties vehicles before and they have then had to prove their ownership.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help

 

He phoned Marstons and has got the details of the court now and the date of the fine and amount so he can contact the court .

 

He told the girl at Marstons he wanted to make an arrangement to pay and she immediately transferred him to the actual bailiff's mobile and he said' No chance .. full payment only and see you at 6am ' !!!

 

I will write on the letter about sorting it out with the magistrates and about the tenancy and goods in the house not belonging to him . I will state that he does not own a vehicle .

 

Is there anything else I need to state ?

 

Should he sign it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not sign anything - TBH, I doubt the bailiff will take any notice of the note on the door sadly. I also doubt (but cannot be sure) he will turn up at 6am in the morning.

 

The advice given of ensuring the court know your friend did not receive a FSN is excellent. In addition to returning it to the stage it was at then, I would also ask for a Means Enquiry Hearing. There is no obligation for the court to grant one of these, so if your friend can go to the court in person and be persistent (NOT rude) - just keep turning up and asking. If possible get a doctor's note stating depression or such like if this is having a detrimental effect on your friend's health, as this will undoubtedly increase the chances of a Means Enquiry Hearing being granted.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to you Unclebulgaria and also Davyly

 

Sadly the Bullyboy has won in this case. My friend was so scared about this guy turning up in the morning that despite my advice he has borrowed the money and paid up in full !!

 

I wish he had listened to my counsel but I understand his fears.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

He really should get a full complaint in about that bailiff and their threatening behaviour. If he doesnt, then he is agreeing with what the bailiff is doing and is helping that bailiff harass other people.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff and the court. Nto sure if theres a bailiff ombudsman but this bailiff does need reporting.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'd have to follow the company's own complaints procedure first, and if serious enough it could be taken to the LGO. He will need solid proof of everything alleged above.

 

The £300 fees are comprised of an initial £85 Admin Fee followed by a £215 Attendance Fee = £300. They're agreed in the HM Courts contract with the bailiff companies.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think it would be LGO for criminal fines, the HMCS Senior Enforcement area manager, may be a better bet, after the court manager has been appraised of the situation. A letter to your MP also is worth a punt, always good to tell them how Enforcement is working (not)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think it would be LGO for criminal fines, the HMCS Senior Enforcement area manager, may be a better bet, after the court manager has been appraised of the situation. A letter to your MP also is worth a punt, always good to tell them how Enforcement is working (not)

 

You are right, thank you. Taken from the LGO site:

 

"If your complaint concerns the bailiffs’ actions in collecting council tax, business rates or traffic enforcement penalties arrearsthen the Ombudsman would normally investigate your complaint."

 

They're anything to do with Councils basically, and even then may want you to take the court route.

 

I couldn't work out how to list the HMCourts Senior Enforcement Managers or I would have done so.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find really worrying is that people contact a bailiff to make a payment arrangement to pay a debt that they do not know anything about !!!

 

Instead, your friend should have been making enquiries with the Magistrates Court that issued the fine. If you friend had not received a summons then he would be allowed to file a Statutory Declaration and the effect of this would have been to "rewind" the matter back to the beginning and a NEW summons would have been sent giving your friend the opportunity to complete the Means Enquiry form.

 

Even if payment has been made he is still permitted to file a Statutory Declaration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take tomtubby's advice and get him to swear that stat dec, then all the bailiffs fees would be refunded, allowing the original fine amount to be paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...