Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SWT cancelled train, booked on FGW - no-one refunds/compensates?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a ticket, Trowbridge to Waterloo, via the FGW website. Ticket issued no problem, got the email and SMS confirmations as usual.

 

Arrived at the Station - train is cancelled. Station staff told me I can claim a refund for the ticket, plus compensation (as I told them I would then have to drive to London).

 

Filled out the form, attached (and luckily scanned) the tickets. Waited.

 

A while later, get a letter from FGW apologisin. No refund. No compensation.

A while later still, get an email from SWT saying they don't have to offer compensation for a cancelled train.

 

I repled to the SWT email saying my claim is not for compensation due to a cancelled train, but for a failure in their IT system to inform me when they cancelled the train. I was also told the system should not have allowed me to book that train, so I advised it's actually 2 failures in their IT system.

 

2nd response from SWT was "I don't believe I am going to be able to

respond to your satisfaction and I'm afraid that further correspondence will only serve to

frustrate you."

 

I am about to take this to the small claims court but before I do, I wondered if you have any other routes to sort this mess out.

 

Many thanks, readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasting your time in small claims, considering the most you can get back is the rail fare you paid, if you win.

 

You can't claim for a REFUND and COMPENSATION, it is one or the other.

 

A refund if you decide ENTIRELY not to travel, compensation if you get to your destination more than 60 minutes later than planned, and only if the delay is down to the railway, (so not suicide/vandalism/cable theft etc).

 

Consequential loss, (fuel costs, taxis, hotels etc), cannot be reclaimed.

(Condition 42 - National Rail Conditions of Carriage)

 

... the Train Companies do not accept liability for any loss (including

consequential loss) caused by the delay and or cancellation of any train.

 

Even if station staff did tell you that you could claim something back, it is voided by:

 

59. Limitation of authority of a Train Company’s staff or agents

A Train Company’s staff or agents have no authority to waive or change these

Conditions.

 

What's happened is that you've booked your cheap ticket before engineering work has been planned/confirmed. Subsequently times have been changed and your train was never supposed to exist as a result. The train could not be cancelled, as it never (theoretically) existed.

 

You need to give more details, e.g. did you end up travelling, did you hold an Advance ticket, what reservations did you have, what exactly are you claiming for etc.

 

But ultimately if you travelled AT ALL on that ticket, your option for a refund goes out the window and compensation is only payable if you were delayed by more than 60 minutes once you reached your final destination.

 

No other payments can be made for your loss.

Edited by firstclassx
Link to post
Share on other sites

What alternatives did FGW/ SWT have in pace at the station to enable you to continue your journey?

 

In the case of engineering works a bus replacement would be operating or local agreements with other public transport providers to allow you to travel.

 

As firstclass has said, you would only be able to get a refund on your ticket only and not compensate you because you decided to use another method of transport.

 

At which point of the journey was the train "canceled"?

Still on the lookout for buried treasure!

 

Any advice I give here is based on my own experiences throughout my life, career and training and should not be taken as accurate. If in doubt, speak to someone more qualified - a Solicitor, Citizens Advice to name but two possible avenues!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My hunch is that the OP was booked on the three daily direct South West Trains trains from Trowbridge to London Waterloo via Salisbury. (London Waterloo - Bristol Temple Meads - London Waterloo)

 

Trowbridge is run by First Great Western and the staffing there is sparse at times. But I'm confused as to why the staff didn't tell you to travel on the Portsmouth Harbour trains which would have been around 20 minutes behind and change at Salisbury. Or if it really had gone bossums vertical why they didn't send you Bath Spa or Westbury and change. If the ticket validity stated SWT & CONNECTIONS, WARMINSTER-SALISBURY or less likely ANY PERMITTED then this would have been valid on FGW Services for a cancelled SWT service regardless of TOC Ticket Acceptance.

 

If it were a SWT ONLY Advance then without ticket acceptance from FGW this is a little bit of a grey area. You'd have some explaining to do or wait for the next SWT Service and it would be a long wait at that too! My understanding is that a TOC is not obligated to accept the ticket of another TOC without prior management arrangement. (Open to correction on that one)

 

It surprises me that you abandoned your journey. Changing at Bath Spa, Westbury or Salisbury would have incurred small delays assuming normal running and optimal communications between SWT and FGW.

 

Hope that helps :)

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...